IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

13 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
South to Vera Rubin Ridge, (Sites 62-63, Sols 1659-1726, Apr 6 2017-Jun 14 2017)
Phil Stooke
post May 9 2017, 06:29 PM
Post #91


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10153
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Sol 1691 - a short drive, just a few metres, southwestish. Here are the reprojected Hazcams and my recent circular image showing the drive very roughly - map update tonight.

Phil

Attached Image


Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
atomoid
post May 9 2017, 08:34 PM
Post #92


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 866
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Member No.: 196



layer flake stereo of sol1688, presumably one of the '_Brook' vein targets. I'm not sure what the story is with that 'hole' apparently punched in the distressed area with Mahli pin chevrons apparently dragged behind.. the visible Z-offset stripes perhaps due to scan differences in the images being overlaid and made apparent in the stereo, the Mahli frame maybe crept a bit during exposure due to MSL settling?
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post May 9 2017, 10:10 PM
Post #93


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (atomoid @ May 9 2017, 09:34 PM) *
the visible Z-offset stripes perhaps due to scan differences in the images being overlaid and made apparent in the stereo, the Mahli frame maybe crept a bit during exposure due to MSL settling?

If those are focus stacks, that's the kind of thing you expect since the process combines parts of the various images with the best focus. The original images shouldn't show those effects.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post May 9 2017, 10:45 PM
Post #94


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10153
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



"I'm not sure what the story is with that 'hole' apparently punched in the distressed area with Mahli pin chevrons apparently dragged behind.. "


That's no MAHLI pin chevron! Those are ChemCam pits in sand, made the day before:

http://www.midnightplanets.com/web/MSL/ima...CAM02687L1.html

Each new blast pushes sand into the previous pit (each pit is the sum of numerous zaps with the laser).

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post May 10 2017, 03:08 AM
Post #95


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10153
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



This is Jan's panorama from sol 1690 in circular form. It's basically the same as Paul's except I took it out to the horizon. We get a good view of the geography of the site. The Murray Buttes are just becoming visible again - they had disappeared behind the local horizon for a while but as we climb they are reappearing.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post May 10 2017, 11:30 AM
Post #96


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2820
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Navcam L view on Sol 1691.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post May 10 2017, 12:04 PM
Post #97


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



One of a series of pre-drive focus merged MAHLI's from sol 1691. A 30 millimeter scale has been bar added (based on the focus motor count reported for the first image then using Gerald's MAHLI Ruler)
Attached Image

Other MAHLI's from 1691 LINK
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post May 10 2017, 02:15 PM
Post #98


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



For the focus-stacked images, the motor count for the first image may be well off-focus. In this case, the motor count of the first image of the stacked image is 13722, while it is 13916 for a sharp similar single image.
Whenever the scale is essential for an investigation, I'd recommend to work with single unstacked images, and apply the scale to the sharpest areas.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post May 10 2017, 11:05 PM
Post #99


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (Gerald @ May 10 2017, 10:15 PM) *
I'd recommend to work with single unstacked images, and apply the scale to the sharpest areas.

Thanks Gerald
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post May 10 2017, 11:14 PM
Post #100


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



1691 L-MastCam of Curiosity's workspace, assembled in MS ICE, scaled using AlgorimancerPG. Reduced size posted here, LINK to full resolution on IMGUR
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
atomoid
post May 11 2017, 09:03 PM
Post #101


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 866
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Member No.: 196



QUOTE (fredk @ May 9 2017, 02:10 PM) *
If those are focus stacks, that's the kind of thing you expect since the process combines parts of the various images with the best focus. The original images shouldn't show those effects.

Thanks! I had no idea the RAW images actually contained stacked products, automated perhaps..

QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ May 9 2017, 02:45 PM) *
...
That's no MAHLI pin chevron! Those are ChemCam pits in sand, made the day before:
http://www.midnightplanets.com/web/MSL/ima...CAM02687L1.html
Each new blast pushes sand into the previous pit (each pit is the sum of numerous zaps with the laser).
Phil

Thanks, a surprising answer I never considered.. That was the explanation I was looking for!

This sol1691 m34 may show some of the craziest lacey fillagree so far (at lower middle), its amazing what otherworldly effects saltating fines can have on loosely cemented sedimentary layers at near zero humidity and pressure over geologic timescales. There's no R m100 counterpart, but it was also captured in a less dramatic view by navcam on sol1690 so here's the anaglyph/cross/parallel of that:
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post May 11 2017, 09:28 PM
Post #102


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (atomoid @ May 11 2017, 10:03 PM) *
Thanks! I had no idea the RAW images actually contained stacked products, automated perhaps..

That's right, automated - see here for example.

You can usually identify the focus stacks pretty easily because they'll be paired with a range map, like this one:
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/ms...878S00_DXXX.jpg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post May 13 2017, 11:59 AM
Post #103


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



Sol 1693: 2 ChemCam RMI mosaic assembled in MS ICE, raw images, without processing except the stitching. Shown with a R-MastCam context image. This could be the target 'Bear Island mentioned in this mission update
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post May 13 2017, 01:26 PM
Post #104


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2820
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Navcam L View on Sol 1693.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post May 13 2017, 02:27 PM
Post #105


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



Sol 1693: L-MastCam workspace: Processed in MS ICE. Reduced resolution version to fit the max upload limit of 1Mb.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

13 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 06:32 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.