IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Super-resolution challenge, Help requested by the science team
john_s
post Nov 1 2008, 12:16 AM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 696
Joined: 3-December 04
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Member No.: 117



Greetings:

Here's another chance to maybe help out the New Horizons science team! We are planning the Pluto imaging sequence, and are considering the best strategy for squeezing the maximum resolution out of our images, including "super resolution" techniques, particularly for the side of Pluto that faces away from us at close approach, which we will see with a disk diameter of only about 120 pixels in our high-resolution camera LORRI. As some members of this forum have done impressive work with super-resolution processing of MER images, maybe you can try your hand with some synthetic "Pluto" images to see what the potential is? This may be more challenging than for MER, because our PSF is relatively broad, about 2 pixels wide.

We want to know how many images to take of a given face of Pluto to get maximum benefit from super resolution techniques, if indeed they are useful at all.

I plan to generate a bunch of synthetic images with slightly different pixel positioning and smear, and with realistic noise levels, and then make them available for experiments to see how well they can be combined and sharpened to improve the resolution.

If you are interested in giving this a shot, let me know. Also let me know if you can work with 12-bit or 16-bit images, and if so what format is most convenient. I can easily make 16-bit FITS files, for instance. It may be that 8-bit PNGs will be adequate, too.

Thanks,
John.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
siravan
post Nov 8 2008, 09:59 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 128
Joined: 10-December 06
From: Atlanta
Member No.: 1472



Here is the effect of subpixel shift-and-add on the dataset. The image on the right is the first raw image, enlarged twice and unsharped. To make the one on the left, all the raw images are scaled x8, then the amount of shift for each one compared to the first image (in the x8 setting, i.e. 0.125 pixels resolution in the original dataset) is found and they are co-added taking into account the shift value, and finally the co-added image is rescaled to x2 and processed using the same unsharp filter as the one applied to the image on the right.

The main difference in that unsharping introduced lots of noise to the raw image, whereas the processed image tolerated it much better and some previously unseen features are now detectable.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
john_s
post Nov 10 2008, 08:41 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 696
Joined: 3-December 04
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Member No.: 117



Thanks to both ugordan and siravan for those images! We're also interested in what can be done with a smaller number of images, 4, for example. Could you try the same thing using just four of the input images?

Thanks,
John.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- john_s   Super-resolution challenge   Nov 1 2008, 12:16 AM
- - tedstryk   I am definitely interested. I will say this. Alt...   Nov 1 2008, 02:33 AM
|- - john_s   Cool! Tell me your preferred image format. J...   Nov 1 2008, 03:25 AM
|- - tedstryk   QUOTE (john_s @ Nov 1 2008, 04:25 AM) Coo...   Nov 1 2008, 12:47 PM
|- - john_s   So do you prefer TIFF files? If so, I have to fig...   Nov 1 2008, 03:00 PM
|- - tedstryk   QUOTE (john_s @ Nov 1 2008, 03:00 PM) So ...   Nov 1 2008, 03:04 PM
|- - john_s   Great, here's a file with 6 simulated images o...   Nov 1 2008, 04:19 PM
|- - john_s   And here's the other six... John.   Nov 1 2008, 04:27 PM
||- - john_s   Oops, there's a bug in those image sets- they ...   Nov 1 2008, 06:46 PM
||- - tedstryk   As far as stacking goes, these might be interestin...   Nov 1 2008, 06:58 PM
|- - siravan   QUOTE (john_s @ Nov 1 2008, 11:19 AM) Gre...   Nov 2 2008, 10:07 PM
|- - john_s   OK, here's a new and improved set of six FITS ...   Nov 3 2008, 09:10 PM
|- - john_s   Not sure why those two ZIP files ended up in the s...   Nov 3 2008, 09:15 PM
|- - john_s   And the rest of the images in PNG format...   Nov 3 2008, 09:19 PM
|- - john_s   By the way, the PSF in these simulations (not coun...   Nov 3 2008, 09:24 PM
|- - ugordan   Here's a flicker gif between a single frame an...   Nov 3 2008, 11:11 PM
|- - john_s   Nice! It looks like you did some sharpening- ...   Nov 4 2008, 12:14 AM
|- - ugordan   I used the Smart Sharpen filter in Photoshop, usin...   Nov 4 2008, 08:40 AM
- - siravan   Here is the effect of subpixel shift-and-add on th...   Nov 8 2008, 09:59 PM
|- - john_s   Thanks to both ugordan and siravan for those image...   Nov 10 2008, 08:41 PM
- - Fran Ontanaya   I had to try. 2x I used 5 images plus one to ...   Nov 13 2008, 09:54 AM
|- - tedstryk   Here is my take. I have versions with 4 frames, 6...   Nov 13 2008, 01:07 PM
|- - tedstryk   Here is a view of Triton when it was 120 pixels ac...   Nov 14 2008, 05:00 AM
- - john_s   This is a synthetic image using a Galileo photomos...   Nov 15 2008, 04:22 PM
|- - tedstryk   QUOTE (john_s @ Nov 15 2008, 04:22 PM) Th...   Nov 20 2008, 01:34 PM
- - Andrei   I'll take the challenge...I only hope that I...   Nov 19 2008, 01:23 PM
- - S_Walker   Sorry I'm late to this test, just joined the s...   Oct 16 2009, 04:43 PM
- - S_Walker   Next is all 12 images resized 2x, aligned and driz...   Oct 16 2009, 04:45 PM
- - S_Walker   My final version upsamples all 12 images, align th...   Oct 16 2009, 04:51 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 06:38 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.