MSL Curiosity Lands Safely in Gale Crater, Landing and Commissioning Activity Period 1A, sols 0-8 |
![]() ![]() |
MSL Curiosity Lands Safely in Gale Crater, Landing and Commissioning Activity Period 1A, sols 0-8 |
Aug 20 2012, 08:20 PM
Post
#1081
|
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 13272 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Yeah - at full length it's 7.5 meters from the top of the deck to the skycrane....which puts it about 8.5m above the surface.
BUT - there's probably 3 seconds of 0.75m/sec constant velocity descent of the descent stage after touchdown - so that 7.5 bridle will have wound back in by about 2.25m - so surface would have been 6.25m. D |
|
|
|
Aug 21 2012, 12:12 PM
Post
#1082
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 9-August 12 Member No.: 6521 |
Doug, does the MSL EDL playback in Eyes on the Solar System now match up with the actual data returned?
BTW amazing job on all the visualisations - my 8 year old son was fascinated by the EDL animation but somewhat disturbed by the waste of money represented by the landing stage crashing! Had to explain the whole endeavour costs quite a lot of money and that was just part of it:) |
|
|
|
Aug 21 2012, 01:51 PM
Post
#1083
|
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 13272 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
|
Aug 21 2012, 07:21 PM
Post
#1084
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 271 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Santa Cruz, CA Member No.: 196 |
Apologies if i missed a discussion on this, but I hadnt heard much speculation on why there is so much debris on deck, its surprising considering the skycrane plumes extended outward from the rover somehow all this sand and pebbles got kicked up somehow apparently in opposition to prevailing forces. I dont think there were any other potential forces except the wheels hitting the ground, so im puzzled by what exactly hoisted this much stuff up on deck... any facts or thoughts?
..unless its not martian, but terran debris? perhaps pyro device remnants (i woudlnt expect heatshield debris to make it inside the shell as that would probably be serious!) |
|
|
|
Aug 21 2012, 07:40 PM
Post
#1085
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 508 Joined: 3-December 04 From: Boulder, Colorado, USA Member No.: 117 |
If you aim a garden hose at the ground at a steep but oblique angle, you'll get some water splashing back in the direction the jet comes from, even if most of it goes in the opposite direction- I expect something similar happened in this case.
John |
|
|
|
Aug 21 2012, 07:42 PM
Post
#1086
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 643 Joined: 23-December 05 From: Forest of Dean Member No.: 617 |
Apologies if i missed a discussion on this, but I hadnt heard much speculation on why there is so much debris on deck... Take a look at the touchdown sequences in the movies posted on the MARDI thread... -------------------- --
Viva software libre! |
|
|
|
Aug 22 2012, 09:10 AM
Post
#1087
|
||
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2566 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
I've got a LOT to learn on Photoshop (and I know it;-)) but anyway, I took a context picture from Astro0 from the Gale crater thread and I tried to put Eduardo's Oppy route on it to show, a mere few hours before Curiosity's first drive, the looooong route she'll have to rove to catch up with his/her fellow rover.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
||
Aug 22 2012, 01:25 PM
Post
#1088
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 488 Joined: 19-February 05 From: France, close to Paris (& 5mn drive from Meudon Observatory) Member No.: 172 |
So, it tooks me a little time, but finally get the result I want. Lots of congrats Ant 103 for this SUPERB work of yours ! And it was so nice and good to have you "on board" during the live MSL landing event close to Paris... And thanks to the weblinks to your Normandy pictures with their impressive chalk cliffs. Indeed one of the most interesting geological places : as you may know, the bottom of the English Channel with its tear-shaped islands is considered by some English and French geologists as a close replica to typical outflow channels on Mars thanks to the two so-called "North Sea Megafloods" that occured 425,000 and 225,000 years ago respectively... Look at those cliffs, imagine a salmon-pink sky ...and you're on Mars ! Cheers ! |
|
|
|
Aug 23 2012, 03:01 AM
Post
#1089
|
||
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 9 Joined: 9-August 08 From: Austin, TX Member No.: 4309 |
I've got a LOT to learn on Photoshop (and I know it;-)) but anyway, I took a context picture from Astro0 from the Gale crater thread and I tried to put Eduardo's Oppy route on it to show, a mere few hours before Curiosity's first drive, the looooong route she'll have to rove to catch up with his/her fellow rover. It looks like they want to rove in 2 years what Oppy did in approx. 8 years. |
|
|
|
||
Aug 23 2012, 03:23 AM
Post
#1090
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 28-July 11 Member No.: 6088 |
If you aim a garden hose at the ground at a steep but oblique angle, you'll get some water splashing back in the direction the jet comes from, even if most of it goes in the opposite direction- I expect something similar happened in this case. John Does this also mean that the rover had hydrazine exhaust blown all over it? Does that contaminate any of the instruments? Maybe with dust that has reacted with the hydrazine exhaust , or is that not possible. |
|
|
|
Aug 23 2012, 10:07 AM
Post
#1091
|
|
|
Forum Contributor ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 906 Joined: 8-February 04 From: North East Florida, USA. Member No.: 11 |
The project scientist has said that the jets would be no problem as the decay of hydrazine was well understood. The jets also were angled outwards, but some blow back did occur, more than they expected. The two main labs are sealed inside the rover.
|
|
|
|
Aug 23 2012, 11:36 AM
Post
#1092
|
||
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1061 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Columbus OH USA Member No.: 13 |
The jets also were angled outwards, but some blow back did occur, more than they expected. How about as the descent stage angled away--would that tend to blow stuff back toward the rover? Phil Stooke did an amazing projection showing an aerial view of the landing site--here's a crop: Seem like you can see the imprint of each of the four plumes, and the pair closest to the rover are further apart, as if the descent stage is tilted? I think that's the direction that it flew off in (left). -------------------- |
|
|
|
||
Aug 23 2012, 01:12 PM
Post
#1093
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3538 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Seem like you can see the imprint of each of the four plumes, and the pair closest to the rover are further apart, as if the descent stage is tilted? I think that's the direction that it flew off in (left). My guess is that's a reprojection artifact. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Aug 23 2012, 02:34 PM
Post
#1094
|
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 13272 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Given how well behaved everything was during edl - I'd agree. Reprojection.
|
|
|
|
Aug 23 2012, 02:39 PM
Post
#1095
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1061 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Columbus OH USA Member No.: 13 |
Given how well behaved everything was during edl - I'd agree. Reprojection. Isn't the descent stage supposed to angle away from the landing site after the bridle cut? The projection is striking in that the rover tracks are correctly shown as parallel, and the "pirouette" wheel marks circular. -------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 07:57 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|