IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Why has Cassini not done a high-rez mosaic of Titan?
Vultur
post Jan 28 2009, 07:56 AM
Post #16


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 202
Joined: 9-September 08
Member No.: 4334



The trick for making an extrapolation look right would be the color, I think. Most of the closer images show enough variation in color that it would look unconvincing without it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 28 2009, 09:21 AM
Post #17


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



You've asked for insight into mission reasons why it hasn't been done.

You've been given them. Multiple reasons from multiple people.

You may not agree with them, but that is essentially irrelevant.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Jan 29 2009, 11:54 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



I am kind of curious why we don't seem to have better resolution maps of Titan by now, though. It seems (naively, perhaps) that there have been quite a few different flyby traectories by now, so I'd have expected most of the super fuzzy regions to be filled in. Or am I just not looking at the right composite?

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA11146.jpg

For example, there's a big blurry spot at 30S, 270W. And a fuzzy corridor at 120W between 0 and 30N. On the South Polar map, there's a completely blank spot at 60S, 300W. I can understand that the North has been harder to image, pending the Equinox, but why is there a blank WEDGE from 60S up between 0 and 60W?

If only to help planning for future missions, I'd think we'd want 100% coverage of the surface to some resolution.

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jan 30 2009, 12:03 AM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3231
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



The southern trailing hemisphere has been poorly covered to date by Cassini. There is no getting around that. We have a non-targeted encounter, IIRC, coming up later in the XM that will help fill that gap. We are trying to fill in coverage over the leading hemisphere now. But that is mostly over the southern hemisphere, so that corridor from TA/TB at 120 W does look a bit fuzzier.

60S up between 0 and 60W - do you mean 285-315W. 0-60W looks just fine to me.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jan 30 2009, 12:05 AM
Post #20


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



For what it's worth, Voyager 1 did take high resolution full disk mosaics of Titan. Voyager colour wasn't great, but it could still be fudged. So all is not lost. But you've never seen those mosaics because they are completely bland and effectively useless from a scientific point of view. Still it could be a starting point.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jan 30 2009, 01:33 AM
Post #21


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Just out of curiosity, has anybody developed a good model of the effects of phase angle & camera angle on surface resolution at various wavelengths for Titan? The haze layer seems relatively uniform; such a model might also provide some insight on its composition (not much, I admit.)


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lyford
post Jan 30 2009, 03:33 AM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1281
Joined: 18-December 04
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 124



Ah, just film a cue ball in amber light with some vaseline on the lens and call it a day! rolleyes.gif
Or you could tweak the hue of some of MESSENGER's shots of Venus, no one will notice.*



*KIDDING.


--------------------
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Jan 30 2009, 04:39 AM
Post #23


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Jan 29 2009, 04:03 PM) *
60S up between 0 and 60W - do you mean 285-315W. 0-60W looks just fine to me.

Oops -- I said 60S and meant 60N!

Look at the north polar region (lower-left in the link I posted). From the pole down to 60N , there's a missing wedge between 0 and 60 W.

You can sort of see this in the rectangular map too. There's very little above 60N at all, of course, but from 0 to 90W or so, there's a lot missing between 60N and 30N.

Of course, after the equinox you'll get some great north polar pics, right? And, uh, don't forget to wrap up the south polar ones before that! :-)

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jan 30 2009, 04:47 AM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3231
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Okay, yep that gap is real. Again, in later NT encounters we should fill that gap.

Don't worry, you're not the only one who gets annoyed by these gaps. But we understand the types of encounters we need to fill them so we should fill those by the end of the mission.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Jan 30 2009, 04:23 PM
Post #25


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



Oh I don't think "annoyed" is the right word -- disappointed is probably closer. With so many flybys, I'd been hoping to watch the Titan map gradually fill in, but it hasn't happened that way. Glad to here there actually are plans to do it, though. I was half afraid you were going to tell me that there were some spots that just couldn't be imaged well because you couldn't have a flyby that went over them. Yet another reason to look forward to an orbiter, though.

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Mar 17 2009, 02:35 PM
Post #26


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1582
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



QUOTE (stephenv2 @ Jan 27 2009, 09:17 PM) *
But perhaps some images that could be used this way will still be taken. I will be working on film until at least late 2010, so there's still time.


T-51 Titan ISS "Global Map" at 9 hours out?
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/files/20090327_...description.pdf

It would seem they hope to have some cloud and haze features in there that would help mosaic-ing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stephenv2
post Mar 17 2009, 03:06 PM
Post #27


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 48
Joined: 27-December 06
From: Greensboro, NC USA
Member No.: 1522



QUOTE (stevesliva @ Mar 17 2009, 09:35 AM) *
T-51 Titan ISS "Global Map" at 9 hours out?


That would rock if it is a full disk mosaic. That's what I read too - but I'm no scientist.


--------------------
stephen van vuuren
filmmaker
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th April 2024 - 04:49 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.