IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Emily's KBO diagram, under development and open for discussion
ngunn
post Feb 17 2012, 08:49 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



In this post Emily demonstrates an interesting way to depict the movements of Kuiper Belt objects: http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00003381/

I like this diagram. It reminds me of lissajous figures on an oscilloscope screen in the case where the x and y signals have the same frequency but differing phase relationships. I agree with the idea of reducing the size of the objects' position and direction markers. Perhaps tiny triangles could serve in both capacities by being oriented to point along the 'orbits'. I would like to see Sedna included since the (so far) unique nature of its motion would stand out well. I think its trajectory during at least the second half of the 600 year timespan in question would fit on the diagram.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
cndwrld
post Feb 28 2012, 10:00 AM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 247
Joined: 17-February 07
From: ESAC, cerca Madrid, Spain.
Member No.: 1743




I like your diagram, Emily. It just depends who your audience is, I guess. To me, it isn't intuitive. It is really nice, but requires some figuring out. And of course, making something obvious and intuitive is always the hard part. Plus, no single diagram works for everyone, so I could be in a minority.

I tried to put here a screen shot of one section of the Venus Express long term planning poster I use. We like to show relative positions using the standard orbit diagrams, Sun centric. It isn't fancy, or even accurate; but it is intuitive.

Attached Image


I was wondering about using a form of the orbit diagram, coupled with the orbit in different colors. One could show the orbits from above, to give you the relative distance from the Sun. To add a second dimension, you could color code the orbit ellipses to show relative distance from the ecliptic. If one used a spectrum, from minus-a-lot degrees through zero degrees to plus-a-lot degrees, going from red to green to blue, you might see more intuitively both how the eccentricity of the orbit changes as well as the distance from the ecliptic.

Pair that with a shot of the orbits taken from 'the side', in the ecliptic, showing the relative elevation of the orbits above the ecliptic. The two together, with duplicated information reinforcing each other, might make it more intuitive.

I hope the idea is clear. I also hope it isn't stupid. But I'd settle for just clear. Stupid ideas, I have lots of those.




--------------------
--
cndwrld@yahoo.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 11:41 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.