Cryosat Mission Feared Lost |
Cryosat Mission Feared Lost |
Oct 9 2005, 12:22 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 370 Joined: 12-September 05 From: France Member No.: 495 |
QUOTE (dilo @ Oct 8 2005, 10:09 PM) I know that traditional russian vehicles (like Soyuz) are extremely reliable... probably, this do not apply to this launcher (cannot find infos about it). And yes, this strongly recall me the Solar Sail fiasco...! You can compare the launch vehicule reliability in the following link (see "2005 Launch Vehicle Reliability Stats") http://www.geocities.com/launchreport/slr.html According to these stats, Rokot reliability is not so bad. This other link is also a good one when you are searching for information on launchers, spacecrafts, missions... http://www.skyrocket.de/space/space.html |
|
|
Oct 9 2005, 12:32 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 370 Joined: 12-September 05 From: France Member No.: 495 |
QUOTE (OWW @ Oct 8 2005, 10:38 PM) A Molnya rocket failed in June. And in October 2002 a Soyuz with ESA microgravity experiments exploded. BTW, I recall the last Rokot launch last month also had problems. Or was it just the Monitor-E satellite? The reports were a bit vague about that. Actually, the launch of Monitor-E was a success, the satellite suffered a communication glitch shortly after launch, but communication with the satellite was restored shortly after. http://www.spacedaily.com/2005/050827095150.u72qqpvz.html |
|
|
Oct 10 2005, 11:10 AM
Post
#18
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 370 Joined: 12-September 05 From: France Member No.: 495 |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2005, 12:35 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 4279 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
QUOTE (hal_9000 @ Oct 8 2005, 11:02 PM) Russians should apply more technology in its vehicles. More technology require more funds... but I can't see it. I don't think that Russians should abandon this projects as Volna, Dnerp, Rockot... IMHO, the question is not about technology but quality assurance & testing. Of course, it means $$$ too. |
|
|
Oct 10 2005, 02:51 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Oct 10 2005, 07:35 AM) IMHO, the question is not about technology but quality assurance & testing. Of course, it means $$$ too. You get what you pay for, as the Cosmos 1 team learned the hard way. My sincere condolences to the Cryosat team. Russia, if you want to stay in the space business, you better generate a few more dollars for quality control. You are not the only space game in town. -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Oct 10 2005, 03:16 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
Volker Liebig, ESA’s Director of Earth Observation, answers questions on the
loss of ESA’s CryoSat due to launch failure. More at: http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Cryosat/SEM1OR5Y3EE_0.html -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Oct 10 2005, 04:37 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 688 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Sweden Member No.: 273 |
QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Oct 10 2005, 04:51 PM) Russia, if you want to stay in the space business, you better generate a few more dollars for quality control. You are not the only space game in town. Actually if the problem was in the software it is very untypical for the russians. Traditionally hardware quality has been the nemesis of the russian space program (and almost everything else russian). The traditional view is that in anything that can be done by just thinking hard or with pen and paper the russians are normally the best in the World. tty |
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 12:21 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
QUOTE (tty @ Oct 10 2005, 06:37 PM) Actually if the problem was in the software it is very untypical for the russians. Traditionally hardware quality has been the nemesis of the russian space program (and almost everything else russian). The russians had a few software mess-ups themselves. The first (I think) launch of the Energia vehicle, which was supposed to lift a military payload failed because the upper stage payload guidance was somehow flipped by 180 degrees, the spacecraft ended up braking instead of inserting into orbit. -------------------- |
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 02:25 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
QUOTE (ugordan @ Oct 11 2005, 07:21 AM) The russians had a few software mess-ups themselves. The first (I think) launch of the Energia vehicle, which was supposed to lift a military payload failed because the upper stage payload guidance was somehow flipped by 180 degrees, the spacecraft ended up braking instead of inserting into orbit. The Mars 4 through 7 probes all had their computer chips accidentally degraded, but the Soviets had to launch them anyway to keep within the window timeframe. This is why they all ended up failing evnetually. http://www.astronautix.com/craft/marsm73.htm -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Oct 15 2005, 01:42 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 370 Joined: 12-September 05 From: France Member No.: 495 |
Recent tests showed that "obsolete" old Russian ICBMs still work. So, I suppose that the space launchers derived from them should also work.
Details at : http://www.spacewar.com/news/icbm-05e.html |
|
|
Oct 15 2005, 06:00 PM
Post
#26
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 356 Joined: 12-March 05 Member No.: 190 |
astronautix: "Unfortunately, this entire series of spacecraft experienced failures on arrival at Mars due to pre-flight test of the electronics with helium, which resulted in degradation of the computer chips during the journey to Mars."
?? Testing with helium caused damage to the microchips? Wish there were more info on this out there... |
|
|
Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
Oct 15 2005, 09:06 PM
Post
#27
|
Guests |
I've got some -- a much more detailed account of the whole affair from a scientist associated with the Soviet Mars program. I'll review it and report later.
|
|
|
Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
Oct 16 2005, 12:12 AM
Post
#28
|
Guests |
The report (V.G. Perminov, "The Difficult Road to Mars", 1999) doesn't mention helium -- but it does say: "Suddenly, during testing of the power system, the onboard blocks started to fail. Analysis showed thqat in all cases the power system malfunctioned because of a failure of the 2T312 transistor, which was fabricated at the Voronezhskiy plant. An interministry commission carefully analyzed this problem and came to the conclusion that the reason for the transistors' failure was intercrystalline corrosion in the area of the transistor lead.
"To save gold resources, some 'smart person' suggested that the gold leads be replaced by aluminum ones. The necessary tests were not made. And so 2 yeasrs later, this suggestion caused major trouble. The only way to remedy the situation was to replace the flawed transistors with ones fabricated according to the old technology." Since this would have taken at least 6 months, and studies showed a 50-50 chance that any craft carrying the transistors would make it to Mars before they started to fail, the Kremlin decided to gamble on flying the four 1973 Mars craft in the hope that they could pull off a Mars landing before the Vikings got there. But three of the four craft malfunctioned en route -- Mars 4 faiiled to fire its retrorocket (although it did snatch some photos), Mars 7's lander failed to fire its trajectory-change rocket after ejection, and Mars 6 totally lost its radio transmission system only 2 months out. It neverthless carried out the remainder of its mission automatically, but it's still not known why the lander lost contact virtually at the moment of landing. By the way, Perminov also reveals that the crash of the Mars 2 lander -- the first man-made object ever to hit the planet -- occurred not because of any onboard failure, but because the Mars ephemeris data programmed into Mars 2's autonomous navigation system for the final midcourse maneuver was slightly inaccurate, so that the lander entered at too steep a trajectory. He's still a little bitter at the US not providing the USSR with the better ephemerides they already had (which occurred only a year later, in exchange for the Soviets releasing more of their data from the Veneras). He also thinks that the post-landing Mars 3 failure may have been due to a static discharge from the massive ongoing dust storm. |
|
|
Oct 16 2005, 02:41 AM
Post
#29
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1636 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Lima, Peru Member No.: 385 |
Bruce, Thanks for bring us the knowledge of the previous report and also of others.
Rodolfo |
|
|
Oct 16 2005, 02:51 PM
Post
#30
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Oct 15 2005, 07:12 PM) Since this would have taken at least 6 months, and studies showed a 50-50 chance that any craft carrying the transistors would make it to Mars before they started to fail, the Kremlin decided to gamble on flying the four 1973 Mars craft in the hope that they could pull off a Mars landing before the Vikings got there. But three of the four craft malfunctioned en route -- Mars 4 faiiled to fire its retrorocket (although it did snatch some photos), Mars 7's lander failed to fire its trajectory-change rocket after ejection, and Mars 6 totally lost its radio transmission system only 2 months out. It neverthless carried out the remainder of its mission automatically, but it's still not known why the lander lost contact virtually at the moment of landing. Jonathan McDowell told me that Mars 6 came down at too fast a speed on very rough terrain, which could certainly explain the sudden lost of contact. http://www.planet4589.org/space/space.html The estimated impact speed was 61 meters per second. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_2 So, if the Soviets had not screwed up on this technical point, perhaps the first transmissions from the Martian surface would not have been the Vikings. I still hope some day the Mars 2, 3, and 6 landing/crash sites are found and investigated. -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 03:18 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |