IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
What are the limits on rocket fairing size
Tom Womack
post Jan 20 2014, 01:32 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 3-January 07
Member No.: 1551



Fairing diameter is one of the more absolute restrictions that shows up in mission planning.

Obviously there's a drag impact at liftoff, but I'd be very interested to see a quantitative analysis as to why a ten-metre-diameter fairing is not a practical object. Has anyone got a pointer to one?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jan 20 2014, 02:20 PM
Post #2


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



I don't, but it's an interesting question. Suspect that in addition to drag it also has a lot to do with the aerodynamics of the entire stack. If the fairing diameter significantly exceeds that of the booster there's gonna be a lot of chaotic airflow right underneath the fairing during transit through the lower atmosphere which might cause a lot of bad things like vibration, oscillation outside the authority of the stability control system, etc.

Think that the biggest fairing I've heard of was 6m for current boosters, but 5m seems more like the usual max.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 20 2014, 03:23 PM
Post #3


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



There's also more than just drag....you can also move the center of pressure too far forward. In essence, like throwing a dart backwards...it'll want to flip on you.

Drag is a problem though - a first order approximation....a 10m fairing presents 75sqm of x-section drag...whereas a 5m fairing only 20sqm. This URL shows some numbers.....these wouldn't necessarily quadruple ( you would be going slower I'm the thicker atmosphere ) but a different and slower flight profile would also inflict higher gravity losses.

http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/01/1...or-scalability/

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Jan 20 2014, 07:12 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



NSF is probably a better resource for this type of question:

http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=29319.0


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jan 20 2014, 07:43 PM
Post #5


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Yeah, NSF ain't bad for things like this.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Jan 20 2014, 08:28 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1582
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



These guys would know:
http://www.ata-e.com/asymmetric-payload-fairing

I think the practical limit is that the fairing itself just gets too massive. But I'm not a rocket scientist.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
raduczoid
post Jan 21 2014, 02:00 PM
Post #7


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 13-December 13
Member No.: 7054



So let's ask a rocket scientist wink.gif Any volonteers?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Jan 21 2014, 04:22 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



If you read the NSF thread I linked to above, you'll find that the general rule of thumb is that the fairing diameter should be no more than 1.5x the diameter of the core stage. ULA advertises custom fairings up to 7.2 meters for Atlas V, but I'm not sure anyone has taken them up on this. Obviously larger fairings or asymmetrical fairings are possible up to the size allowed by the pad infrastructure, if cost is no object.

In the real world of robotic mission design, any proposal that doesn't use a standard fairing available from the LV vendor with flight heritage is likely to be DOA.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 06:52 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.