IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
A transformer approach to Mars, Taking flight directly upon arrival
karolp
post May 24 2008, 10:58 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 14-April 06
From: Berlin
Member No.: 744



I believe this approach was considered briefly in some kind of ESA/French plans of a Mars aeroplane. Namely, the spaceraft would take flight immediately after entering the atmosphere and simply stay afloat as long as possible. Taking the shuttle into account, I believe getting through the plasma and simply gliding on instead of immediate touch down is possible. I sort of like the direct and straightforward aspect to this - like removing a barrier in space exploration?

Also, perhaps that would be possible for... ground-based vehicles? We already did airbags and vertical powered landing, but how about using the speed horizontally? How about taking a low angle approach, slowing down just to have a non-damaging speed level and then just sliding on the ground for maybe tens of kilometers while having some sort of camera attached to a capsule holding the actual spacecraft? That camera could stay on top if we attached some kind of stabilizers to the protectice capsule, which would also be elongated for that purpose... Imagine having a camera travelling much further than the current 11 km record and taking pictures all along the way? I know this sounds way too crazy, but just on the technical feasibility level, is it at all possible?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dmuller
post May 25 2008, 12:17 AM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 340
Joined: 11-April 08
From: Sydney, Australia
Member No.: 4093



I think one of the old Soviet probes tried to release a balloon as they landed on Mars, if memory doesnt fail me (again). A ballooning mission (rather than a plane) is being thought about for a possible future mission to Titan as well


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post May 25 2008, 01:18 AM
Post #3


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



In terms of complexity, a balloon is a much less risky approach...and UMSF is all about minimizing mission risk.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JonClarke
post May 25 2008, 02:27 AM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 112
Joined: 17-November 05
From: Canberra
Member No.: 558



QUOTE (dmuller @ May 25 2008, 12:17 AM) *
I think one of the old Soviet probes tried to release a balloon as they landed on Mars, if memory doesnt fail me (again). A ballooning mission (rather than a plane) is being thought about for a possible future mission to Titan as well


Hi Daniel

This was the joint Russian-Planetary Society-French balloon project. It never flew.

The Russians successful released two balloons, one each, from the VeGA 1 and 2 landers they descended through the atmsophere of Venus.

Jon
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post May 25 2008, 03:12 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (JonClarke @ May 25 2008, 04:27 AM) *
Hi Daniel
This was the joint Russian-Planetary Society-French balloon project. It never flew.
The Russians successful released two balloons, one each, from the VeGA 1 and 2 landers they descended through the atmsophere of Venus.
Jon

...and the French "God" for this is Jacques Blamont. According to AW&ST he was on a cooperation meeting between Chinese vs Other in Beijin recently. He's the father of the Balloon that inflate during the day and deflate during the night (landing) concept. Very simple and straitforward. Hope it'll fly in the future. I met Jacques once in Pasadena for Voyager II encounter with Neptune with the TPS (Planetfest 89 it was). BTW, GO Phoenix, GO !


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JonClarke
post May 25 2008, 05:02 AM
Post #6


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 112
Joined: 17-November 05
From: Canberra
Member No.: 558



QUOTE (climber @ May 25 2008, 04:12 AM) *
...and the French "God" for this is Jacques Blamont. According to AW&ST he was on a cooperation meeting between Chinese vs Other in Beijin recently. He's the father of the Balloon that inflate during the day and deflate during the night (landing) concept. Very simple and straitforward. Hope it'll fly in the future.


It is so elegant I hope it does.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tasp
post May 25 2008, 06:05 PM
Post #7


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 30-January 05
Member No.: 162



Maneuverable ballute concepts have been discussed in regards to landing on Triton and/or Pluto here. Might be interesting to see if anyone has any ideas for hybridizing ballute/hypersonic/supersonic/subsonic techniques for Martian conditions.

Explosive bolts would allow virtually instantaneous reconfiguration of a vehicle as different flight regimes were encountered . . .

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post May 26 2008, 12:39 AM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



The Mars Airplane idea has been around. Here are a couple of links:

http://marsairplane.larc.nasa.gov/platform.html (Nice pics with this one.)

http://www.redpeace.org/ (This one has a little more substance)

I was a little surprised, since I'd thought airplanes had to be supersonic to fly on Mars, but apparently not. Without an oxygen atmosphere, though, the plane ends up awfully heavy.

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd May 2024 - 05:38 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.