BepiColombo Status |
BepiColombo Status |
Mar 4 2008, 06:37 PM
Post
#46
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 206 Joined: 15-August 07 From: Shrewsbury, Shropshire Member No.: 3233 |
A story of interest to UK members of UMSF.COM has been posted today on the BBC web site.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7274956.stm Physicists and astronomers have three weeks to make the case for a number of high-profile projects at risk of being cut from the UK's science portfolio. Can anyone provide me with a link to a more complete version of this story? I have a personal interest in the ExoMars rover and would like to know whether the UK contribution to this project has been cut? |
|
|
Jul 5 2008, 05:06 PM
Post
#47
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 718 Joined: 22-April 05 Member No.: 351 |
BEPICOLOMBO NARROWLY AVOIDS CANCELLATION
By PETER B. de SELDING Space News Staff Writer PARIS — Europe's BepiColombo mission to Mercury has narrowly escaped what would have been a precedent-setting cancellation. The satellite's mass has grown to the point that it no longer is capable of being launched by a medium-lift rocket, according to European government officials. The unexpected weight gain led to development delays and also forced a shift in plans that will require the use of a heavy-lift Ariane 5 vehicle. The combination of the delay and the shift to a more expensive launcher will add 120 million euros ($189 million) to the mission's budget, the European government officials said. Complete article at: http://www.space.com/spacenews/spacenews_summary.html#BM_5 -------------------- |
|
|
Jul 6 2008, 06:21 AM
Post
#48
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 571 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Silesia Member No.: 299 |
Interesting quotes:
"A majority of the members of Europe's Science Program Committee (SPC), which oversees the space-science program based on budget guidelines at the European Space Agency (ESA), voted to cancel BepiColombo in June despite the fact that industrial contracts have been signed and considerable money already spent." "It's certain that, had we known in 2006 what we know now, we never would have agreed to start BepiColombo." "Southwood said he would reopen contract negotiations with Astrium Satellites with a view to reducing the price." Why I am not astonished ? I think, it's beginning of end for BepiColombo. -------------------- Free software for planetary science (including Cassini Image Viewer).
http://members.tripod.com/petermasek/marinerall.html |
|
|
Jul 6 2008, 06:44 AM
Post
#49
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 220 Joined: 13-October 05 Member No.: 528 |
Tough to predict. Bepi-Colombo's roots go way back into the mid-90s , and it also has JAXA as an international partner building an entirely separate orbiter from the ESA planetary orbiter. I think one of the things that saved Cassini from cancellation in the early 90s was the Huygens probe being built by ESA. NASA was reluctant to back out of the project with the commitment they had made to ESA.
So it seems that there are many factors influencing this decision. One of the things not mentioned in the article was the Exo-Mars mission, also slated for a 2013 launch window. I've wondered for a long time if having two big ticket planetary missions with the same schedule would pose a problem on budgets. And like Bepi-Colombo, the Exo-Mars budget has gone up a few times. IIRC the cost estimate on that one started around 600 million Euros, and has gone up around 1 Billion in the last six months. However, the way ESA gets money is more complex than the NASA model. I get the impression that each project is funded by separate contributions from each contributing partner nation. So it may be that Bepi-Colombo and Exo-Mars will never compete with each other for funds, at least not directly. |
|
|
Jul 6 2008, 11:01 PM
Post
#50
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 718 Joined: 22-April 05 Member No.: 351 |
However, the way ESA gets money is more complex than the NASA model. I get the impression that each project is funded by separate contributions from each contributing partner nation. So it may be that Bepi-Colombo and Exo-Mars will never compete with each other for funds, at least not directly. I suspect that the experience of cost over runs on both ExoMars and Bepi-Colombo will make ESA more cautious in scoping and selecting future planetary missions. Problems once development is underway is fairly common for all space agencies, it seems. If memory serves me correctly though, both of these experienced large cost increases fairly early in the process. Anyone have a better memory than I? -------------------- |
|
|
Nov 28 2010, 07:59 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
|
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 02:08 AM
Post
#52
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 555 Joined: 27-September 10 Member No.: 5458 |
Is the mission back on then? Last I had heard, it was indefinitely postponed or cut all together (I forget which).
-------------------- |
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 06:19 AM
Post
#53
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
It has been approved in a modified (and much more expensive) version for launch in 2014 and arrival at Mercury in 2020
|
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 07:24 AM
Post
#54
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 555 Joined: 27-September 10 Member No.: 5458 |
Thats quite fantastic to hear and a surprising turnaround from what I last heard!
-------------------- |
|
|
Aug 22 2011, 05:28 PM
Post
#55
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
BepiColombo's Mercury orbiter undergoing thermal vacuum tests http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Space_Engineer...EV8RTJRG_0.html
|
|
|
Aug 22 2011, 08:47 PM
Post
#56
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14448 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
It's not actually BC that's undergoing thermal vac...that would infer the real spacecraft is built. It's not.
From the article " A highly accurate, full-scale engineering model...." |
|
|
Sep 10 2012, 12:12 PM
Post
#57
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
anybody has a detailed timeline of BepiColombo (flybys etc.) after the latest delay?
the ESA mission site only has the launch and arrival dates (15 August 2015 and 27 January 2022). I have made a quick google search, but I have not found anything useful. most of the links date back to when BC was supposed to fly in 2014. |
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 10:17 AM
Post
#58
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 247 Joined: 17-February 07 From: ESAC, cerca Madrid, Spain. Member No.: 1743 |
The information I have is on this other ESA page here.
Key mission dates Date Mission event 15 August 2015 Launch 14 August 2016 Earth flyby 25 November 2017 First Venus flyby 18 July 2018 Second Venus flyby 15 February 2019 First Mercury flyby 07 November 2019 Second Mercury flyby 26 January 2021 Third Mercury flyby 08 March 2021 Fourth Mercury flyby 27 January 2022 Arrival at Mercury 27 April 2023 End of nominal mission 27 April 2024 End of extended mission -------------------- --
cndwrld@yahoo.com |
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 05:01 PM
Post
#59
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2012, 03:41 PM
Post
#60
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 102 Joined: 8-August 12 Member No.: 6511 |
15 August 2015 Launch 14 August 2016 Earth flyby 25 November 2017 First Venus flyby 18 July 2018 Second Venus flyby 15 February 2019 First Mercury flyby 07 November 2019 Second Mercury flyby 26 January 2021 Third Mercury flyby 08 March 2021 Fourth Mercury flyby 27 January 2022 Arrival at Mercury 27 April 2023 End of nominal mission 27 April 2024 End of extended mission Seven! flybys! That has to be a record. MESSENGER only had three -- one each with Mercury, Venus, and Earth. And that's while using an ion drive. I know the delta-V to climb down to Mercury is really high, but still... But: googling, I see that the total spacecraft mass is 1350 kg -- 1100 kg for MPO and 250 kg for MMO. That's almost three times the mass of Messenger, a relatively svelte 485 kg. So I guess they found that with the flybys and the ion drive they could deliver a lot more probe. Doug M. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 11:23 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |