Meteorites from Mercury? Options

[Guest_Enceladus75_*]

I see in the current issue of Astronomy magazine (November 2008) that there is a very interesting article about a class of meteorites that are theorised to have possibly originated on Mercury. We now know of meteorites that came from the Moon and Mars, and there might also be some from Venus, but I think that it is fascinating that we may have, right here on Earth, pieces of the innermost planet at hand.

Would it take a sample return mission from Mercury to prove these meteorites came from the planet or could the Messeneger results in the coming years clinch the question?

What do others think?

[pjam]

Hey, that's a good point about Kara-Kul being youngish and fairly large. It's worth a good study, to see if a crater that size and at that elevation could produce ejecta that would escape the Earth. To assess the possibility of Kara-Kul as a possible source for terran meteorites, we need a better understanding of its age and crater diameter, though. It might not be as young or as large as advertised! Unfortunately, it is difficult to do geological fieldwork in Tajikistan these days...

The ejected blocks from Kara-Kul would not be metamorphosed in the normal geological sense by the shock event, they would just be variably shocked pieces of the target rock. A big issue here would be that only the most competent rocks would survive ejection -at least, this is the current argument for why we have only igneous rocks as martian meteorites. The sedimentary rocks on Mars' surface more likely get destroyed during ejection. ...but for Kara-Kul as the terrestrial analogue, maybe limestones are competent enough to act like a basalt and survive ejection during the impact event.

-pjam
Phil McCausland