IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Farewell Beacon..., The next cape beckons...
Phil Stooke
post Nov 28 2006, 03:42 AM
Post #31


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10150
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



I looked back, but I don't see that at Bonneville. From orbit, nothing looks like it's blowing out. From the rim, the dark streaks crossing Bonnevile look like dust devil tracks to me. The one area that might be different is an area of dark dunes under the west wall, but other dunes are lighter, suggesting to me another DD track, or possibly a patch of dark sand like Eldorado, which we do see getting trapped in certain topographic situations.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MarkL
post Nov 28 2006, 03:57 AM
Post #32


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 240
Joined: 18-July 06
Member No.: 981



Good one Shaka. Much rather be a dirty streaker!

I might go for a clean streak though, if the special mechanism that makes it appear as though dust is coming out of the bays is explained by repeated cleaning events. Well behaved dust devils perhaps? Also, in Meridiani the dust is dark and the outcrops are light, unlike much of the rest of Mars.

Prometheus, that's it!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Nov 28 2006, 06:29 AM
Post #33


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



I really have to think Phil is right, that the dark areas have been windswept "clean" of the ubiquitous bright dust. Which means that Oppy ought to be able to get a nice panel-cleaning by placing herself in the path of those winds!

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Nov 28 2006, 06:36 AM
Post #34


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



QUOTE (Shaka @ Nov 27 2006, 01:34 PM) *
... But Tom, those of us in the "Ancient Victoria" school of thought, don't believe that we are seeing, driving over, or ratting Victoria's ejecta. We hold that ejecta is nowhere to be seen. What we are seeing is sandstone that roofed over Victoria back in the Noachian/Hesperian, was subsequently indurated and leached by ground water to produce concretions, and finally eroded and collapsed.

I am frantically awaiting close-up views of the uppermost exposures in the capes to see if they are primarily intact, in situ, more or less horizontal sandstones. The latest pancam of "Hoy" looks remarkably in situ right to the top. If close examination confirms this all around Vikky, then I will hold my hypothesis to be supported. I cannot emphasize too strongly that a hypervelocity impact shatters the target rocks near the crater, transforms some into exotic forms, hurls them high into the air and deposits them around the crater with a more or less random orientation of chunks (OK, clasts) in an impact breccia. We saw some of this around Beagle, though that was such a tiny crater that regular impact models may apply imperfectly.
I have not yet seen anything around Victoria that I would call impact breccia. Close-up views may reveal it, if we ever get any. Hence my disappointment when Beacon was bypassed. ...
But Shaka, I contend that we have seen several cross sections of capes relatively close-up at this point, including CSM. All of them appeared to be mantled by a jumbled layer of blocks in random orientations. That looks like an impact breccia to me. The stable places that have endured long periods of erosion seem to display flat faces eroded by wind, and the less stable areas that have seen mass wasting more recently display the boulders in various stages of erosion. I don't see anything like in-place bedding at the surface on any of the capes, so far.

I know that in the past I had argued that Victoria wasn't all that ancient, but I have since modified my view and have mentioned that. I think it is fairly old, but I am not certain how old. I am still looking for evidence of the hypothesized ancient fill that was eroded, undercut, and which subsequently collapsed. I am not convinced I see it in the close-ups we have so far. If I had to make a guess from our current selection of close-up samples, I'd guess the original crater was smaller than the current hole.

QUOTE (Shaka @ Nov 27 2006, 09:08 PM) *
I agree with Phil's points. I think our position represents one pole of a "streak hypothesis", ...
We could call these two schools of thought, the "Clean Streakers" and the "Dirty Streakers"!
I'm sure Ustrax could devise some appropriate mascots. cool.gif
Who wants to sign up?
I agree with him too, but...Oh, no. Let's not start another polarizing argument with team badges. We won't have the measurements needed to decide until Opportunity gets to a dark streak, and even then we won't have the calibrated spectral information. From my point of view, the simplest explanation is that the well observed and globally distributed light dust has been removed here, as it has on all of the rougher, upper slopes of this crater...


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Nov 28 2006, 11:40 AM
Post #35


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



QUOTE (Shaka @ Nov 28 2006, 03:08 AM) *
We could call these two schools of thought, the "Clean Streakers" and the "Dirty Streakers"!
I'm sure Ustrax could devise some appropriate mascots. cool.gif
Who wants to sign up?


I hope this leaves clear what is my position about this childish creation of teams to discuss such important subjects...


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marz
post Nov 28 2006, 04:06 PM
Post #36


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 311
Joined: 31-August 05
From: Florida & Texas, USA
Member No.: 482



QUOTE (ustrax @ Nov 28 2006, 05:40 AM) *


I think I just heard Doug breath a deep sigh of relief! tongue.gif

Phil seemed to sum up what I think the streaks are, so I suppose I'm more of a clean-streaker. That seems alot more comfy than being a fence-sitting streaker...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MizarKey
post Nov 28 2006, 04:16 PM
Post #37


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 295
Joined: 2-March 04
From: Central California
Member No.: 45



I'm joining the 'clean' streakers. But Oppy should be careful approaching the cleaned area, there may be dust buildup surrounding the cleaned areas.

I wonder if the winds that create the cleaned streaks are seasonal or persistent?


--------------------
Eric P / MizarKey
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jeff7
post Nov 28 2006, 05:53 PM
Post #38


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 477
Joined: 2-March 05
Member No.: 180



El Dorado was a dark spot though, and it was a prime deposition spot.


Either way, I imagine we'll find out soon enough what's going on at those streaks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MarkL
post Nov 28 2006, 06:24 PM
Post #39


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 240
Joined: 18-July 06
Member No.: 981



QUOTE (ustrax @ Nov 28 2006, 11:40 AM) *
I hope this leaves clear what is my position about this childish creation of teams to discuss such important subjects...

I am so on that bandwagon Ustrax!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sattrackpro
post Nov 28 2006, 09:13 PM
Post #40


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 136
Joined: 13-October 05
From: Malibu, CA
Member No.: 527



QUOTE (MizarKey @ Nov 28 2006, 08:16 AM) *
I'm joining the 'clean' streakers. But Oppy should be careful approaching the cleaned area, there may be dust buildup surrounding the cleaned areas.

I wonder if the winds that create the cleaned streaks are seasonal or persistent?

As with Spirit's local where winds develop in the summer, I'd expect similar seasonal effects at Victoria too.

Since the wind 'tracks' are relatively short (and wider) by comparison to many seen at craters in Gusev, it appears that the size and strength of the whirlwinds that form in Vicky's bowl are probably shorter-termed, somewhat weaker, and less tightly concentrated than those observed at Gusev.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Nov 29 2006, 07:36 PM
Post #41


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Not a long drive sol 1012 but enough to give a nice long baseline with the 1009 images in the direction of the Hoy cliff feature. This makes it a lot easier to make out where one cape ends and the next one farther back begins in the images:
Attached Image

I prefer the cross-eyed version:
Attached Image

Some distortion here since movement wasn't perpendicular to the line of sight, and pretty serious lighting differences.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
exoplanet
post Nov 30 2006, 12:32 AM
Post #42


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 48
Joined: 19-February 05
Member No.: 171



I'm beginning to think that Victoria with its "capes and bays" looks more and more like a sinkhole rather than a crater.

See here:

http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/earthgwsinkholes.html

The first image at the above link looks nearly identical to the "bays" that we see in Victoria.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Nov 30 2006, 02:15 AM
Post #43


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



QUOTE (MizarKey @ Nov 28 2006, 10:16 AM) *
I'm joining the 'clean' streakers. But Oppy should be careful approaching the cleaned area, there may be dust buildup surrounding the cleaned areas.

I'm not worried about dust build up on Oppy. Compared to Spirit she seems to have better luck finding cleaning events. Compare the sundials of the two rovers.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Nov 30 2006, 01:11 PM
Post #44


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (exoplanet @ Nov 30 2006, 12:32 AM) *
I'm beginning to think that Victoria with its "capes and bays" looks more and more like a sinkhole rather than a crater.


I think it's a bit of both: Impact - fluidisation of substratum - undermining and irregular collapse of rim - wasting by sublimation from the fluidised floor material - partial infill and some reshaping of rim by aeolian processes. This is an old idea and we have seen much since it was first aired (2004 if not before), including the paper on the burial and exhumation theory in print, another paper on a possible new easy-melt Martian mineral, HiRise and all the Rover imagery so far. I haven't seen anything yet that makes me want to switch my bet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Dec 1 2006, 10:10 AM
Post #45


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2819
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The panoramic view in the drive direction on Sol 1012.

Taken with the L0 Navcam.

jvandriel
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 09:55 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.