IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

LCROSS en route
NGC3314
post Jul 15 2009, 03:08 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 87
Joined: 9-November 07
Member No.: 3958



While we're waiting for Those Pictures, here are a couple of shots of LCROSS from our campus observatory last night (0221, 027 UT on 15 July). 4 minute exposures tracking expected motion from the Horizons ephemeris, within 20 degrees of the southern horizon and fighting summertime haze as well as city lights. I wanted to catch it before its inclined orbit takes it too far south, after which it spends a week or so as a predawn object. The range was about 563,000 km, and the Centaur is no bigger than a CSM/LM combination, so this is a more difficult target than spotting an Apollo enroute was. (On the other hand, nobody had CCD imagers in 1969).

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Astro0
post Aug 27 2009, 02:12 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



In response to the Spaceflight Now article, this response from the LCROSS team...

During a communications session on Aug. 22, it was discovered that a fault had been triggered in the spacecraft's inertial reference unit, or IRU. The IRU is used by the probe's attitude control system to determine its orientation in space.
The fault in the IRU caused LCROSS to switch to its star tracker for attitude information. Noise in the star tracker resulted in the spacecraft's attitude control system firing the spacecraft's thrusters excessively, consuming a substantial amount of propellant.

The mission operations team was able to correct the situation and stop the excessive thruster firing. Mission engineers determined what went wrong and uploaded software updates that should prevent such an incident from recurring.

The big issue was determining how much propellant was lost and how much was required to successfully complete the mission. The good news out of all of this is that the problem was caught and corrected in time so that the spacecraft still maintains a positive propellant margin; we still have more than enough propellant to successfully complete the mission. However, our extra margin of propellant is not nearly as much as it was previously. Mission management and the operations team want to maintain a prudent propellant margin for the rest of the mission and are therefore looking at the schedule of upcoming maneuvers to determine which are really necessary and which we can do without.

The bottom line here is:
1. An anomaly occurred which caused excessive use of propellant on the spacecraft.
2. The anomaly was detected and corrected.
3. Even after the anomaly, we have enough propellant to complete the mission.
4. We are still on target for a October 9 impact at 11:30 UT.

I know we promised you an exciting mission, but we are all looking forward to toning down the excitement until impact!

...End Message.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- NGC3314   LCROSS en route   Jul 15 2009, 03:08 PM
- - nprev   Sweet!!! What's your campus scop...   Jul 15 2009, 10:44 PM
|- - NGC3314   0.4m Ritchey-Chretien, using one of the big Santa ...   Jul 16 2009, 02:52 AM
- - Lewis007   An article on the "cold side bake-out" p...   Aug 10 2009, 07:25 AM
- - mps   LCROSS experienced an anomaly: http://www.nasa.gov...   Aug 25 2009, 06:43 AM
- - Zvezdichko   Oh, this is BAD! But they are optimistic that ...   Aug 25 2009, 09:46 AM
- - nprev   Wow. Is the IRU in question part of the Centaur it...   Aug 25 2009, 12:39 PM
|- - ugordan   Hmm, I thought star trackers were the de facto met...   Aug 25 2009, 01:03 PM
- - John Moore   There were some initial problems with the star tra...   Aug 25 2009, 05:00 PM
- - Lewis007   On August 17, LCROSS took additional images of the...   Aug 26 2009, 06:41 AM
|- - Marz   Here's a Spaceflight article explaining the re...   Aug 26 2009, 03:27 PM
- - Astro0   In response to the Spaceflight Now article, this r...   Aug 27 2009, 02:12 AM
- - nprev   Good info, all (thanks for the late-breaking, Astr...   Aug 27 2009, 02:21 AM
- - climber   More good news: http://www.spaceref.com/news/views...   Sep 5 2009, 05:33 PM
- - Astro0   Nice memo to the LCROSS team and well deserved. I ...   Sep 5 2009, 11:37 PM
|- - climber   QUOTE (Astro0 @ Sep 6 2009, 01:37 AM) I...   Sep 6 2009, 11:40 AM
|- - stevesliva   QUOTE (Astro0 @ Sep 5 2009, 07:37 PM) I...   Sep 6 2009, 11:37 PM
- - Paolo   Just announced: impact in Cabeus A   Sep 11 2009, 05:13 PM
- - Hungry4info   Quick question regarding DSN time between Cassini ...   Sep 11 2009, 05:16 PM
- - elakdawalla   Anybody see any graphics online anywhere? I'v...   Sep 11 2009, 05:33 PM
|- - ugordan   FWIW, this post over at the NSF.com forum has an i...   Sep 11 2009, 05:55 PM
- - John Moore   Cabeus A crater location...the impacts should be v...   Sep 11 2009, 06:00 PM
- - Phil Stooke   "Quick question regarding DSN time between Ca...   Sep 11 2009, 09:15 PM
- - Ron Hobbs   The above link doesn't work for me; try this o...   Sep 11 2009, 10:33 PM
- - belleraphon1   For those who missed the briefing here it is on Yo...   Sep 11 2009, 11:19 PM
- - eoincampbell   Thank you for posting that very informative press ...   Sep 12 2009, 05:56 AM
- - PhilCo126   For those hoping to see the impact; here're th...   Sep 12 2009, 08:05 AM
- - Tman   Here a GIF animation of the Moon phase and the vis...   Sep 13 2009, 03:50 PM
- - Paolo   Target crater switched from Cabeus A to Cabeus (pr...   Sep 28 2009, 08:46 PM
- - John Moore   I would think that they'll probably aim for th...   Sep 29 2009, 01:03 PM
- - Phil Stooke   http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/386497main_target-selectio...   Sep 29 2009, 01:45 PM
- - John Moore   Thanks Phil Page 19 is very useful and probably m...   Sep 29 2009, 03:06 PM
- - tanjent   Note that in the Colaprete report the Earth observ...   Sep 29 2009, 04:34 PM
- - Phil Stooke   The latest release did refer to new topographic da...   Sep 29 2009, 04:55 PM
- - elakdawalla   Ask and ye shall receive I asked your questions ...   Sep 29 2009, 08:19 PM
- - Phil Stooke   Here's a map of the approximate locations of t...   Oct 2 2009, 03:30 PM
- - elakdawalla   What are the coordinates of the different impact s...   Oct 2 2009, 04:03 PM
- - Tman   The Google group of LCROSS (amateur) Observation h...   Oct 2 2009, 04:35 PM
- - Phil Stooke   From the Observation Group website: -------------...   Oct 2 2009, 08:06 PM
|- - dmuller   QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Oct 3 2009, 06:06 AM...   Oct 4 2009, 12:53 AM
- - John Moore   Took the latter coords., -- rough idea, therefore,...   Oct 2 2009, 10:41 PM
- - Phil Stooke   Here's the latest info from Tony Colaprete, vi...   Oct 3 2009, 08:45 PM
- - John Moore   That's better! The recent DIVINER image ...   Oct 4 2009, 02:01 PM
- - Phil Stooke   This is what I get by overlaying Colaprete's m...   Oct 4 2009, 02:36 PM
|- - John Moore   Isn't that exact same as in my link above? Jo...   Oct 4 2009, 03:45 PM
- - Phil Stooke   It's the image processing that's different...   Oct 4 2009, 03:59 PM
- - centsworth_II   Here's the map comparison that interests me: T...   Oct 4 2009, 04:59 PM
- - Phil Stooke   Also the map of hydrogen concentrations is very mo...   Oct 4 2009, 05:07 PM
- - Phil Stooke   This is a comparison of the points John and I matc...   Oct 4 2009, 05:18 PM
- - JGodbaz   QUOTE (centsworth_II @ Oct 5 2009, 05:59 ...   Oct 5 2009, 08:10 AM
|- - centsworth_II   QUOTE (JGodbaz @ Oct 5 2009, 03:10 AM) Th...   Oct 5 2009, 03:34 PM
- - John Moore   @ Phil...ah yes...see what you mean, your points a...   Oct 5 2009, 11:00 AM
- - Phil Stooke   John, it's only the 'quote' business t...   Oct 5 2009, 11:16 AM
- - Phil Stooke   It's hard to keep these maps up to date! ...   Oct 6 2009, 01:16 AM
- - JGodbaz   Thanks, I wasn't aware of the new release. I...   Oct 6 2009, 01:31 AM
- - Phil Stooke   If it was worse, would they have chosen it? They ...   Oct 6 2009, 01:37 AM
- - JGodbaz   They don't have a lot of choice as there aren...   Oct 6 2009, 01:42 AM
- - Phil Stooke   I think you're right. I bet the site selectio...   Oct 6 2009, 01:47 AM
- - PDP8E   impact is Oct 9, 7:30am-ish local time with the su...   Oct 6 2009, 03:06 AM
|- - ElkGroveDan   QUOTE (PDP8E @ Oct 5 2009, 08:06 PM) impa...   Oct 6 2009, 04:12 PM
|- - Marz   QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Oct 6 2009, 11:12 AM...   Oct 6 2009, 05:23 PM
|- - MahFL   "NASA to Bomb the Moon Friday " Good god...   Oct 6 2009, 06:09 PM
||- - centsworth_II   QUOTE (MahFL @ Oct 6 2009, 02:09 PM) ...   Oct 6 2009, 06:30 PM
||- - centsworth_II   QUOTE (MahFL @ Oct 6 2009, 01:09 PM) ...   Oct 8 2009, 11:13 PM
|- - Stu   QUOTE (Marz @ Oct 6 2009, 06:23 PM) I jus...   Oct 6 2009, 09:52 PM
- - Phil Stooke   Ahh, good old Social Media! Lots of entertain...   Oct 6 2009, 02:36 PM
- - nprev   Okay, I'm convinced. Gonna dust off the ol...   Oct 7 2009, 12:05 AM
- - AndyG   I suspect it won't be up to Gervase of Canterb...   Oct 7 2009, 08:52 AM
|- - MahFL   A far far better report. Good to see media coverag...   Oct 8 2009, 11:50 AM
- - centsworth_II   LCROSS audio briefing HERE. QUOTE Thursday, Oct. ...   Oct 8 2009, 05:38 PM
- - scalbers   Wonder if there are any flyover movies (or sequenc...   Oct 8 2009, 07:44 PM
- - Phil Stooke   Phil   Oct 8 2009, 07:52 PM
- - nprev   AAACKKK!!!! I thought he was gonna...   Oct 8 2009, 08:14 PM
- - scalbers   Here's a crude attempt at animating the lunar ...   Oct 8 2009, 09:14 PM
- - nprev   LCROSS- Centaur separation succesful!!...   Oct 9 2009, 02:15 AM


Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 08:32 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.