Rev 49 - Aug 9-Sep 14, 2007 - Iapetus I1, The only close flyby of Iapetus |
Rev 49 - Aug 9-Sep 14, 2007 - Iapetus I1, The only close flyby of Iapetus |
Sep 11 2007, 10:40 PM
Post
#181
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 813 Joined: 29-December 05 From: NE Oh, USA Member No.: 627 |
Sunspot..
this has certainly not been a disaster.... let us count our blessings. The hit could have happened a few hours earlier... that would have been bad. We have an invaluable set of observations. We need to be patient. The up side is that perhaps this will convince the mission planners to add another Iapetus flyby at the end of the extended mission. But can't wait for the Voyager mountains in high res. Craig |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Sep 11 2007, 10:42 PM
Post
#182
|
Guests |
That's funny, Alex, but I was really looking forward to some nice low phase global views. Given the difficulty of targeting Iapetus in any tour, yes, it would have been nice to have a flawless flyby. However, just imagine if the C/A observations had gotten hosed. |
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:43 PM
Post
#183
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 710 Joined: 28-September 04 Member No.: 99 |
Does this mean we will have no global images of the sunlit side AT ALL? That's a disaster for the mapping gurus I would think....
|
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Sep 11 2007, 10:46 PM
Post
#184
|
Guests |
You know, you "this-has-been-a-disaster" guys all need to calm down and get some perspective. I don't know how you would have survived the last several Io flybys during the final Galileo mission extension, when safe mode seemed to be the normal state of the spacecraft.
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:50 PM
Post
#185
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Far from me saying this was a disaster, but your analogy with Io flybys is a little off. You always had the next Io flyby if the current one failed Besides, I'm sure everyone understood the risks of flying by Io.
This was a one-shot thing. It was supposed to be a routine flyby, more or less. Stupid cosmic ray power trip... -------------------- |
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:50 PM
Post
#186
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 710 Joined: 28-September 04 Member No.: 99 |
Ok, compared to I33 this has been a success. This situation is similar to what happened with Galileo on E19.
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:52 PM
Post
#187
|
|
Lord Of The Uranian Rings Group: Members Posts: 798 Joined: 18-July 05 From: Plymouth, UK Member No.: 437 |
Typical - the first safe mode event for four years had to occur just after the Iapetus flyby...
-------------------- |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Sep 11 2007, 10:53 PM
Post
#188
|
Guests |
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:54 PM
Post
#189
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Ian - what? Solid state power switch trips occur several times a year, each time safing the s/c. We don't always hear about them, they're mostly mentioned in Cassini weekly reports.
Alex, point taken. No raws yet, I'm calling it a day... and a flyby. -------------------- |
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:54 PM
Post
#190
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1624 Joined: 5-March 05 From: Boulder, CO Member No.: 184 |
Yes the thrill of spaceflight. I'm looking to see if we'll get either of the 250m resolution outbound images that would be just before the downlink in question:
http://www.geoinf.fu-berlin.de/projekte/ca...us013_vims.html http://www.geoinf.fu-berlin.de/projekte/ca...3_vims_img.html I'm curious as well about what this might mean for the extended mission(s). -------------------- Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:57 PM
Post
#191
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 121 Joined: 26-June 04 From: Austria Member No.: 89 |
Far from it. All the highest-res observations were successful and are going to be downlinked. The sequence was halted about 6 hours after closest approach, so the outbound full disk stuff got scrapped, which is a bummer, but there is more than enough amazing data to keep everyone busy for a long time. It's just not going to be quite as much as they had planned for. We're lucky we even know how much data acquisition was planned. --Emily 6 hours after C/A - that means that this sequence (and also the following six ! ) are lost: link Robert |
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:58 PM
Post
#192
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 710 Joined: 28-September 04 Member No.: 99 |
Was the WAC snapping pictures just before the downlink?
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 11:01 PM
Post
#193
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3231 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Odd that the press release says 'no impact on Iapetus Science data return' Of all the major icy satellites, Iapetus has the biggest 'terra incognita' patch in the global maps, and this flyby would have more or less filled it... ??? We will fill that gap, don't worry! Just not tonight... It certainly has not been a disaster. Aggravating, but not a disaster. We will get nearly all the high-resolution science we planned on. By the way, the REGMAPTRL001 images are just fine! Most of that just won't get played back until tomorrow. -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 11:04 PM
Post
#194
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
Does this mean we will have no global images of the sunlit side AT ALL? That's a disaster for the mapping gurus I would think.... On one hand, it's a bummer. On the other hand, it gives us another chunk of "Here there be tygers" terrain in the solar system to look forward to discovering in the futue. "Some see the glass as half full, some see the glass half empty, and some see it as time for another round." -Mike -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 11:08 PM
Post
#195
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 509 Joined: 2-July 05 From: Calgary, Alberta Member No.: 426 |
That is really too bad about the full-disk sequence. It would have been nice to see all of Roncevaux Terra at much-improved resolution. I do hope that at least some of the images of the large basin come through. [Edit: I didn't see Jason's above post before saying this.]
The important thing is the high-resolution stuff, though, and that seems to be safe. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 10:45 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |