IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Rev 141: Titan, distant view after the storm
ugordan
post Dec 31 2010, 12:23 AM
Post #16


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



I took the two observations you mentioned - the 2009 one is available at the PDS - and made a flicker gif. CB3 stacked images divided by a MT1 frame in both cases. 50% original resolution, though not much detail is lost due to atmospheric scattering.

Attached Image


I don't know how many of the other subtle albedo changes are due to haze differences (whether in MT1 or closer to the ground in CB3 frames), but the Senkyo change is indeed compelling.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Dec 31 2010, 02:20 AM
Post #17


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Ok that's exciting! WOW!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Jan 1 2011, 03:25 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



From the Rev 143 Looking Ahead article: http://www.ciclops.org/view/6681/Rev143
QUOTE
"Imaging scientists will be looking for clouds across the sub-Saturn hemisphere of Titan, as well as additional surface changes that may have occurred as a result of the large "Arrow Storm" that was seen in late September."


I'll take that as confirmation that this surface change is considered real.



--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
titanicrivers
post Jan 1 2011, 04:23 PM
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 1-April 08
From: Minnesota !
Member No.: 4081



QUOTE (Juramike @ Jan 1 2011, 09:25 AM) *
From the Rev 143 Looking Ahead article: http://www.ciclops.org/view/6681/Rev143


I'll take that as confirmation that this surface change is considered real.

Hard to know! The word 'additional' also appears in the Rev 142 Looking Ahead article and this is before the Dec 20th images that clearly showed the S Senkyo change. Its possible those smaller Dec 5 images did show something although not in the same place as the 310-330 longitude region was beyond the terminator in the unlit portion of Titan.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
titanicrivers
post Jan 3 2011, 10:23 AM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 1-April 08
From: Minnesota !
Member No.: 4081



Another attempt to more precisely locate the September 27, 2010, T72 'arrow storm' cloud tops
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
titanicrivers
post Jan 8 2011, 07:13 PM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 1-April 08
From: Minnesota !
Member No.: 4081



It is interesting to compare the apparent T72 storm Senkyo changes to those noted in the S Polar region of Titan following the large 2004 polar storms (see http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA11147 ) The image below compares the two regions to the same scale. The new S polar lakes that appeared are indicated in the white oval. The most obvious Senkyo change (darker triangular area) is from a much lower resolution image and its composition is still uncertain at this point.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
titanicrivers
post Jan 19 2011, 12:52 AM
Post #22


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 1-April 08
From: Minnesota !
Member No.: 4081



While talking about the S Polar storm and subsequent appearance of lakes in above post I was curious what the Cassini flyby (Ta) saw in the raw images from Oct 2004. One of the best (taken Oct 25, 2004) is shown below (left image panel A) and compared with those of Schaller et al had taken two days before (Oct 23 panel 'B') with Keck adaptive optics. This polar storm was massive (see the Oct 8 Keck image) and was rapidly dissipating when Cassini flew by. Placing a celestia grid to locate the storm residual cloud puts it over the precise area where the lakes were noted in 2005 (see polar projection figure right) suggesting the October 2004 storm was the source of the new lakes.
The interesting Schaller, Brown, Roe and Bouchez paper can be found here.
http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/papers/ps/largecloud.pdf
Attached Image
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jan 19 2011, 01:40 AM
Post #23


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3232
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



I do believe we *cough* strongly suggested that in our 2009 paper.

Stayed tuned to this channel in the near-future as certainly this story isn't over... ph34r.gif


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
titanicrivers
post Jan 19 2011, 01:55 AM
Post #24


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 1-April 08
From: Minnesota !
Member No.: 4081



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Jan 18 2011, 07:40 PM) *
I do believe we *cough* strongly suggested that in our 2009 paper.

HA! I was gonna preface my last post with 'due apologies to VP for the rehash'! unsure.gif I haven't read your full paper....can you give me the link. Thanks!

edit: I believe this is the paper!
http://ciclops.org/media/sp/2009/5480_12560_0.pdf

Nice work!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jan 19 2011, 02:54 AM
Post #25


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3232
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Thanks for the link actually. It used to be that we had so few papers that I could keep these things straight, what info is in what paper. Let's just say that this is no longer the case... We hint at the connection between the flooding of Arrakis Planitia and the October 2004 storm in the 2009 paper, but we will be making a bigger point of it soon.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
titanicrivers
post Jan 24 2011, 07:30 PM
Post #26


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 1-April 08
From: Minnesota !
Member No.: 4081



New (taken Jan 21, 2011) Titan images cover the area of possible change in S Senkyo. The photo is taken from 3.437M km however and so have much less resolution than the Dec 20th 2010 or Mar 21, 2009 images that suggest a change in surface albedo (see posts #’s 13 and 16 above). The darker region near 325W and – 20 S is not very visible at least in my enhanced image. Next months (Rev 145 T74) Titan flyby hopefully will include high resolutions of the Senkyo area* as storm changes may be vanishing if liquids do not remain on the surface for very long.
*Edit: Approx WAC camera view of Senyko on Feb 18 at 22hr just past closest approach on right; courtesy the SSS.
Attached Image
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
titanicrivers
post Jan 28 2011, 01:55 AM
Post #27


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 1-April 08
From: Minnesota !
Member No.: 4081



Here is an image that puts a constraint on the appearance of the apparent albedo change in the S Senyko region. The raw image was taken on September 13th 2010 (just 2 weeks before the T72 storm images). Although relatively low in resolution the region of possible change appears a fairly uniform bright albedo (arrow) suggesting any changes occurred after that date.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
titanicrivers
post Jan 29 2011, 05:26 PM
Post #28


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 1-April 08
From: Minnesota !
Member No.: 4081



Just for fun: N00165573 animated overlay on the ISS basemap of S. Senkyo.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
titanicrivers
post Feb 7 2011, 04:54 PM
Post #29


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 1-April 08
From: Minnesota !
Member No.: 4081



Latest Cassini (CL1 CB3) views of Senkyo show less dark albedo change than in December. Hopefully closer views later this month should show more detail and possibly residual surface changes.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
titanicrivers
post Mar 3 2011, 09:48 PM
Post #30


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 1-April 08
From: Minnesota !
Member No.: 4081



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Jan 18 2011, 08:54 PM) *
. . . but we will be making a bigger point of it soon.

As VP has mentioned he and colleagues will be saying more about their observations on the surface effects of the T72 storm (in up coming LPSC 2011 meeting). The abstracts for the meeting are available on the meeting website http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2011/?view=abstracts including Turtle, Perry et al report on T72 arrow storm effect in the Belet area of Titan. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2011/pdf/1459.pdf
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 06:33 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.