Opportunity's MRO Target, Fluid Flow Features at Victoria |
Opportunity's MRO Target, Fluid Flow Features at Victoria |
Feb 15 2007, 11:28 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 531 Joined: 24-August 05 Member No.: 471 |
Wow, Oppy's next stop ...
----- For instance, it has seen fluid flow features in Victoria Crater just south of the equator, where NASA's Opportunity rover is trudging along the rim. The fractures appear to be surrounded by cemented rock on the eastern crater rim and floor. One of NASA's goals for Opportunity is to get to that side of the crater. If it is able to get close enough, Opportunity might provide some microscopic observations of the rock to confirm whether the rock has been cemented together by fluid. ----- - Underground pipes channelled water on Mars -------------------- - blue_scape / Nico -
|
|
|
Feb 15 2007, 11:47 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 531 Joined: 24-August 05 Member No.: 471 |
-------------------- - blue_scape / Nico -
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 12:15 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
I heard several radio reports today here in the US about MRO finding more evidence of subsurface water...wonder if this is what they've been referring to, haven't seen any actual articles yet.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Feb 16 2007, 12:18 AM
Post
#4
|
Guests |
Try this thread.
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 12:21 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
(slaps head) Do'h!!! I just now went to the JPL site & there it was. Sorry...long day. Thanks!
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 01:27 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Well, heck, we've been discussing those linear features in the east-southeast portion of Victoria's rim ever since the first HiRISE pictures came in.
While it might be interesting to discover some basic faulting that's associated with subsurface water flow, I think there are so many ways in which the local crust could have been gifted with linear faults that assuming the water flow origin is rather premature. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 02:45 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
One obvious mechanism would be that they are artifacts of the Victoria impact itself that may have been altered later by water intrusion. What we've seen of Meridiani thus far seems to indicate a tectonically quiet history, at least at the scales observable by Oppy.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 03:26 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Yes, but this is rather like Occam's Razor. There is no need to bring in extraordinary events here; the areas in Victoria where we see these linear features were originally outside of its rim. The crater has expanded via wall slump so that the walls have expanded *into* linear fault features, which more than likely pre-existed the crater. (In fact, I'd say they'd almost have to -- how many craters have you seen that have created faults tangential to their rims? Impacts more commonly create radial cracking than cracking transverse to the impact surge.)
I'm not saying that these fault features are definitely *not* associated with fluid flows. All I'm saying is that linear faults are fairly common on all of the rocky bodies we've observed (Earth, Moon, Mars and Venus) and in most cases these faults are tectonic in nature. Of the remaining sources of linear faulting that have been observed, only a relatively few are related to fluid flow. So, if it turns out that Oppy can visit these ridges and they turn out not to show signs of fluid flow formation, that doesn't mean there aren't other locations on Mars where fluid flow faulting has occurred. And, conversely, if fluid flow *is* indicated in Victoria's linear faults, that doesn't mean that every similar set of faults we see on Mars were also formed in the same manner. Linear faults are just too common and have too many different causes for such generalizations to always be valid. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 08:55 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 593 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 279 |
I think there are so many ways in which the local crust could have been gifted with linear faults that assuming the water flow origin is rather premature. I agree - personally I'm backing the theory that these are soup pipes. That dragon's not there for nothing! Andy |
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 12:28 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
I don't think they're saying that the fluid created the faults, only that it exploited them. Both the formation of the faults now revealed in the Victoria hole and their hardening by cementation from ground fluids would have predated the impact event, probably by a long interval. The only connection, as I see it, is that this raises the odds that there could be icy - or watery - layers buried beneath the visible aeolian deposits. I (and others before me) have previously proposed sapping by the fluidisation and partial sublimation of such a layer to account for Victoria's vertical cliffs and scalloped rim.
|
|
|
Feb 16 2007, 03:51 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
More pieces to the puzzle. If the faults were caused by the Victoria impact and IF
water flowed through them, that would prove the presence of post Victoria water. |
|
|
Feb 17 2007, 09:31 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't see one or two linear features like these as far back as Mariner 9 and vaguely speculated about volcanic dikes. They almost certainly show up in scattered Viking high resolution images. What we now have is the geologic ground truth supplied by the rovers to give a specific, different interpretation of these features, given our new knowledge of ground water activity and rock alteration history examples from the two rovers.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 07:36 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |