IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

11 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The "Lump of Good Hope", Significant..?
Guest_Edward Schmitz_*
post Feb 26 2007, 04:49 AM
Post #31





Guests






after seeing fredk lbl (thanks for that), it seems that there is a significant under side that is exposed. I'm pretty sure this is, by far, the largest sheltered area we seen.

ed
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Edward Schmitz_*
post Feb 27 2007, 05:01 PM
Post #32





Guests






Another possible lump? I'm beginning to think they are ejecta blocks... The post drive navcams on sol 1100 seems to indicate they are not targetting the lump.

ed
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Feb 27 2007, 05:37 PM
Post #33


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (Edward Schmitz @ Feb 27 2007, 06:01 PM) *
The post drive navcams on sol 1100 seems to indicate they are not targetting the lump.


Maybe. Although the navcams are centered at 180º (i.e. south), the post-drive pancams are centered at SW. My impression is that they are still focusing on taking some shots of Cabo Corrientes from a point nearby the lump.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
antoniseb
post Feb 27 2007, 06:40 PM
Post #34


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 2-August 05
Member No.: 451



I've been assuming that everything above the light colored stripe is ejecta that rained down after the blast that formed Victoria, and this 'Lump of Good Hope' seems to be above that line. Some of you folks with much more geology experience than I've got (I can usually tell a rock from a brick) are saying that the LOGH might be cemented ejecta that has slipped. That sounds OK to me, but it makes me wonder what made it cement together in such a uniform way when all the other ejecta has lots of descrete chunks embedded. I'm open minded about this, so answering is worth while, but to me it looks like this is a very large single lump that held its integrety during the crater formation process.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gray
post Feb 27 2007, 07:06 PM
Post #35


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 242
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Ohio, USA
Member No.: 34



antoniseb,
Your question is very appropriate. The LOGH could be just a VERY large fragment that was deposited along with all the other smaller fragments in the breccia.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Feb 27 2007, 07:46 PM
Post #36


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (antoniseb @ Feb 27 2007, 12:40 PM) *
I've been assuming that everything above the light colored stripe is ejecta that rained down after the blast that formed Victoria...

I'm not sure I'd use the term "rained down," here. I think "surged onto" is more appropriate, this close to the cratering event. It makes a difference when you try to envision the dynamics that emplaced the ejecta layer.

QUOTE (antoniseb @ Feb 27 2007, 12:40 PM) *
Some of you folks with much more geology experience than I've got (I can usually tell a rock from a brick) are saying that the LOGH might be cemented ejecta that has slipped. That sounds OK to me, but it makes me wonder what made it cement together in such a uniform way when all the other ejecta has lots of descrete chunks embedded. I'm open minded about this, so answering is worth while, but to me it looks like this is a very large single lump that held its integrety during the crater formation process.

While the dynamics of the ejecta surge around a cratering event can be well-described in aggregate, the conditions at any given point in the surge tend to be chaotically dynamic. Pockets of gas, pockets of vaporized volatiles (such as water or water ice), layers of soft rock underlying layers of harder rock -- all of these things cause localized discontinuities within adjacent parts of the surge flow.

That's all a rather long-winded way of saying that conditions can be just right to cement some large blocks of ejecta, while adjacent portions of the flow can consist of far more shattered blocks of rock. It's also possible for surge conditions to favor the ejection, whole, of some large blocks of pre-existing rockbeds while all around these large blocks you find far smaller, shattered pieces.

In other words, the conditions in the local ejecta surge around a cratering event could account for the LOGH to be either cemented ejecta (i.e., a breccia of some sort) or an intact block of rockbed. So, in this case, theories aren't enough -- we need (hint, hint) to go take a close look at it (hint, hint) to determine the truth either way (hint, hint).

smile.gif

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
antoniseb
post Feb 27 2007, 08:10 PM
Post #37


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 2-August 05
Member No.: 451



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Feb 27 2007, 02:46 PM) *
So, in this case, theories aren't enough -- we need (hint, hint) to go take a close look at it (hint, hint) to determine the truth either way (hint, hint).


I had the impression that the immediate goal was to find a clean exposed accessible deep cliff so we can examine the chemistry of the layers as they get deeper down. Perhaps looking at the LOGH would be a good scond mission if Opportunity can climb out of the crater at it's first entry point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Feb 27 2007, 08:35 PM
Post #38


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Here's the sol 1100 pancam view of the top of the Lump, heavily stretched because of the afternoon lighting:
Attached Image

And the corresponding anagram:
Attached Image

The top of the Lump is the farthest part of the foreground surface, between centre and right edge.

Apart from Lumpiness, this is a spectacular image! Behind the Lump we have Cabo Corrientes. Immediately behind that, jutting about a third of the way in from the right, is Cape Desire. Behind that, Cabo Anonimo, and behind that, Cape St. Mary rising up to the Beacon at the highest point. I'm quite sure that behind that is Duck Bay, though we can't quite see our entry point yet.

Whew, that's quite the stretch of Victoria's drive foreshortened into one pancam frame!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gray
post Feb 28 2007, 03:55 PM
Post #39


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 242
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Ohio, USA
Member No.: 34



That is *quite* a dramatic view - worthy of a post card.
I also noticed that the breccia on this side of Cabo Corrientes also looks to be quite lumpy. That is, the fragments in the breccia look much larger than they have in other places.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Feb 28 2007, 04:06 PM
Post #40


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



The view from Good Hope.


And the traditional desktop picture wink.gif :


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
antoniseb
post Feb 28 2007, 06:00 PM
Post #41


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 2-August 05
Member No.: 451



I'm a little surprised that there are no images of the apparent fault line running up to LOGH.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gray
post Feb 28 2007, 06:35 PM
Post #42


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 242
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Ohio, USA
Member No.: 34



I was to see some images of the ?faulted? area too. The rear hazcam gives the only view of any spot near that area, but nothing obvious shows up. It's possible that it's a feature that is more obvious from above than at ground level.

PS Great views, Ant. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Feb 28 2007, 06:59 PM
Post #43


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



The sol 1100 navcams show the area of the "linear" feature. The route map shows that we were sitting right on the feature on sol 1100, and we look along it (so it's foreshortened) towards the southwest in these two navcam frames, which I've stretched quite a bit:
Attached Image
Attached Image

It looks like more of the same exposed rock to these non-geological eyes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Mar 1 2007, 06:37 AM
Post #44


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



Absolutely beautiful, Ant103. I wish I could speak French to tell you how much I enjoyed your sol 1100 panorama. When I did my version it hurt me to destroy the mood by stretching the daylight out of those lovely, shadowed cliffs. But we so rarely get raws that can be contrast stretched as far as these could. The devil in me wanted to see the details in the rocks. cool.gif

QUOTE (dvandorn @ Feb 27 2007, 01:46 PM) *
... In other words, the conditions in the local ejecta surge around a cratering event could account for the LOGH to be either cemented ejecta (i.e., a breccia of some sort) or an intact block of rockbed. So, in this case, theories aren't enough -- we need (hint, hint) to go take a close look at it (hint, hint) to determine the truth either way (hint, hint). ...
Doug: I thought your post was an excellent summary of many of the complexities that need to be considered. This thing still has me wondering. In the first navcam set it looks like a breccia, but in the next set it looks like a block of ejected bedrock. I think a "closer look" needs only to be the pancams already captured but not yet revealed. I worry that they might leave me eating crow.

Those pancams will eventually come down the pipe. Until then, here is a HiRise anaglyph of the vicinity that I was looking at tonight, in case it might be useful to someone. I'm still having fun with the raws, but enough already.
Attached Image


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Mar 1 2007, 01:45 PM
Post #45


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (fredk @ Feb 27 2007, 09:35 PM) *
Apart from Lumpiness, this is a spectacular image! Behind the Lump we have Cabo Corrientes. Immediately behind that, jutting about a third of the way in from the right, is Cape Desire. Behind that, Cabo Anonimo, and behind that, Cape St. Mary rising up to the Beacon at the highest point. I'm quite sure that behind that is Duck Bay, though we can't quite see our entry point yet.


Spectacular indeed. cool.gif
About missing the entry point, it's almost there about 10 or 15 meters to the right, behind the beacon.
Here is a crop of sol 1100 pancam mosaic where I'm pointing to a little "bump" at the horizon right to the left of the beacon.
Attached Image

That "bump" is the dune besides Sputnik. Here below are two navcam images, the first taken at Duck Bay during sol 952 and the second one taken on sol 957 while heading to the tip of Cabo Verde, both covering Sputnik and the dune.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

11 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 01:11 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.