IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Herschel: the first science highlights
Paolo
post Jul 16 2010, 06:34 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



The special issue of Astronomy & Astrophysics on the first results from Herschel is now available, with hundreds of papers freely accessible!
http://www.aanda.org/index.php?option=com_...s/contents.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jul 16 2010, 08:20 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Grazie Paolo! smile.gif


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Aug 11 2011, 07:06 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



according to Herschel's twitter (ESAHerschel) they will observe comet Honda-Mrkos-Pajdusakova on Aug 15/16. This small, short period comet has always fascinated me since it was to be flown by "tail first" by Sakigake. Too bad contact with the probe was lost before sad.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Aug 21 2011, 04:28 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



from Herschel's twitter:

QUOTE
Quick look analysis of the Comet 45P/Honda-Mrkos-Pajdusakova observations by Herschel is revealing some wonderful data.


can't wait for publication...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Oct 5 2011, 06:54 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



just published in Nature: Ocean-like water in the Jupiter-family comet 103P/Hartley 2
and this is ESA's release http://www.esa.int/esaSC/SEMER89U7TG_index_0.html
this is one of the most amazing solar system discoveries of 2011!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Sep 29 2012, 05:21 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



according to tweets by Daniel Fischer (@cosmos4u), Herschel should run out of coolant in March 2013 and ESA is considering end of mission scenarios. Warm observations are not possible, so one idea is to deorbit it from L2 and crash it on the Moon to perform scientific observations.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Oct 27 2012, 07:29 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



the story has been picked up by Spaceflight Now
Scientists could aim derelict telescope for moon impact
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Oct 27 2012, 08:21 AM
Post #8


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Exciting idea; very innovative!


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Oct 27 2012, 11:28 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



funny enough: it was also one of the possible end of mission scenarios for Chang'e 2. flying it back from L2 to impact the Moon for science
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tanjent
post Oct 27 2012, 01:13 PM
Post #10


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 214
Joined: 30-December 05
Member No.: 628



Is the hardware actually damaged by the lack of coolant? If Herschel were placed somewhere where it could conceivably be restocked with consumables at some future time, could it be returned to service? I guess the people who don't want to crash it probably envision some Hubble-inspired scenario like that. I recall though, that the last Hubble service call had to be performed before the gyros and other components ceased to function entirely. It wasn't something that could wait 100 years.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Oct 27 2012, 01:57 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



I see at least three reasons why this is not doable:
1. unlike the HST, Herschel was not designed to be serviceable
2. you need to use fuel to keep it into the halo orbit or to redirect it somewhere else to wait for servicing. I understand that fuel remaining is not a issue now, but it will become at a certain moment
3. orbital refuelling has been carried out until now with storable, room temperature liquids (hydrazine and water mostly). transfer of cryogenic fuels has yet to be tested, not to speak of the transfer of super-cold (less than 5K IIRC) liquid helium
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Oct 27 2012, 08:14 PM
Post #12


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10145
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Paolo said "funny enough: it was also one of the possible end of mission scenarios for Chang'e 2. flying it back from L2 to impact the Moon for science"



Strictly speaking the Toutatis flyby is not an end of mission scenario. The question is, what is the post-Toutatis trajectory? I am assuming for lack of other information that the spacecraft will not get very far from Earth and its orbit will bring it back, rather than heading off into a more distant heliocentric orbit. Is there any description of its current orbit?

Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Oct 29 2012, 02:57 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



some insight on the decision to crash Herschel and the possible alternatives on this blog
http://herschellife.blogspot.es/1342197754...-end-of-helium/
I would have loved the Herschel trailblazer concept: placing Herschel at the Earth-Moon L2 point to perform tests for future farside communication satellites before crashing it to the surface. unfortunately, the option was apparently deemed too expensive
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Dec 10 2012, 05:58 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



Finally, no lunar impact http://herschel.esac.esa.int/latest_news.shtml
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Dec 10 2012, 07:55 PM
Post #15


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10145
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Too bad. I'm hungry for another point on the lunar map. Oh well - GRAIL coming up soon, presumably.

Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th April 2024 - 02:00 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.