2 Pallas |
2 Pallas |
Oct 11 2009, 08:49 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
no one seems to have noticed this
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/326/5950/275 |
|
|
Apr 25 2016, 01:58 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Landing or crashing is not considered an option since the spacecraft is not sterilized. Apparently, this would violate NASA Planetary Protection Protocols for Ceres.
Of course, that begs the question of what the plan is should a flyby of any target of opportunity not be possible. I'd guess that would leave just escaping Ceres in a non-targeted way or at the very least raising the orbit as high as possible before the xenon is exhausted and/or a critical failure occurs that renders the spacecraft uncontrollable. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 03:31 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |