IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

20 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Big Tno Discovery
SFJCody
post Jul 29 2005, 08:03 AM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mpml/message/15111
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mike
post Jul 29 2005, 08:17 AM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 350
Joined: 20-June 04
From: Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.
Member No.: 86



Planet X, or perhaps Rama I.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
slinted
post Jul 29 2005, 09:16 AM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 468
Joined: 11-February 04
From: USA
Member No.: 21



Interestingly enough, it had already been found by another group and was given the designation K40506A. It has an elongated shape, 3.9 hour rotational period and a satellite. Total mass of it and its satellite weighs in around 30% of Pluto.

http://www.aas.org/publications/baas/v37n3/dps2005/320.htm
http://www.aas.org/publications/baas/v37n3/dps2005/786.htm
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Jul 29 2005, 09:55 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



Hmmm... ...a candidate for a post-Pluto encounter, perhaps? Depends where it is, of course...


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TheChemist
post Jul 29 2005, 11:52 AM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 524
Joined: 24-November 04
From: Heraklion, GR.
Member No.: 112



BBC article : Distant object found orbiting Sun
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jul 29 2005, 09:55 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



While K40506A/2003 EL61 now appears to be smaller than Pluto based on Spitzer data, another newly announced TNO, 2003 UB313 is defintely larger than Pluto, perhaps as large as Mars.

http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/planetlila/index.html
http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/mpec/K05/K05O41.html


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Jul 29 2005, 10:15 PM
Post #7





Guests






WOW............when will there be an official announcement?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jyril
post Jul 29 2005, 11:29 PM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 249
Joined: 11-June 05
From: Finland (62°14′N 25°44′E)
Member No.: 408



That's not all!

There are third large KBO discovery announcement today (MPEC 2005-O42).

The object, 2005 FY9, may also be larger than 2003 EL61!


--------------------
The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jul 30 2005, 12:58 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (Sunspot @ Jul 29 2005, 03:15 PM)
WOW............when will there be an official announcement?
*

a few minutes ago:

NASA-Funded Scientists Discover Tenth Planet
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solars...net-072905.html


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
odave
post Jul 30 2005, 01:32 AM
Post #10


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 510
Joined: 17-March 05
From: Southeast Michigan
Member No.: 209



The article quotes Brown as saying it will be "visible with a telescope", but you'd better have a big one. S&T gives it a magnitude of 18.9 - Pluto is 13.8, and I have trouble seeing it in my 12.5" dob.

Very cool news. I wonder if this will stir the pot of the whole "is Pluto really a planet" debate...


--------------------
--O'Dave
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Jul 30 2005, 03:20 AM
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Is the object at it's closest approach to the sun?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Jul 30 2005, 03:22 AM
Post #12


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/050729_new_planet.html

Update 11:27pm
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
remcook
post Jul 30 2005, 11:28 AM
Post #13


Rover Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1015
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



Methane on the surface as well...another frozen-out atmosphere?
Looks like a job for Spitzer, Hubble, etc
very cool cool.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Jul 30 2005, 11:42 AM
Post #14





Guests






According to the NY Times, it's nowhere near perihelion. Its 560-year orbit is extremely eccentric -- it's currently 97 AU from the Sun, but has a perihelion of only 35.5 AU -- and tilted an astonishing 44 degrees to the ecliptic, which makes it more understandable that it wasn't discovered before. As for its size: the
Spitzer Telescope cannot yet detect its thermal IR, meaning that it must be
less than twice Pluto's diameter -- but it would be bigger than Pluto even
if its albedo was 100%. It apparently has methane frost like Pluto; if its
albedo equals Pluto's 0.60, it must be about 3000 km in diameter as compared
to Pluto's 2270 km.

Meanwhile, we also have a THIRD big KBO announced today: 2005 FY9, which has
been detected by the Spitzer Telescope and is modestly smaller than Pluto --
along with 2003 EL61, this morning's false alarm, which turns out to be
smaller still. (The latter has a moon, which has allowed its mass to be
calculated at 30% of Pluto's.) Neither of these is small potatoes either,
though, except by comparison with 2003 UB313 -- they seem to be about 70-80%
of Pluto's diameter.

So now we can switch to wrangling drearily over whether the Solar System has
10 planets or only 8 (or 9, if you decide to rate 2003 UB313 as a planet but
not Pluto.) Alan Stern continues to insist that if something's large enough
to be rendered spherical by its gravity, it's a planet -- but that includes
Ceres and probably Pallas and Vesta, and in any case it containes
ambiguities of its own (even if you don't count Bizarro World from DC
Comics, which you may recall was cubical). Personally, I still favor
setting a maximum diameter of 2000 km as the arbitrary planet/nonplanet
dividing line, which will allow Pluto to retain its longtime seat in the
Planet Club without allowing too many newcomers to crash the party.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Myran_*
post Jul 30 2005, 12:37 PM
Post #15





Guests






Bruce. Just wait until they have found a thousand objects with a diameter between that of Pluto and Mars's (and perhaps a few Earth sized ones also) , I dont think the schoolchildren of the future will have to memorize the names of a solar system of more of a thousand planets!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

20 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 04:58 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.