IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

The end of MESSENGER's mission, What happens after March 2013?
Seryddwr
post Apr 21 2012, 10:08 AM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 62
Joined: 11-July 11
Member No.: 6058



I know nothing about either the technological constraints or the funding possibilities, but I was wondering if anyone knew what might happen to the probe once the extended mission at Mercury comes to an end. Is it definitely going to be decommissioned? Or is there a chance of sending it somewhere else? Is there sufficient propellant to allow it to break orbit using the LVA, and (say) conduct a flyby of an Aten or Apollo asteroid? I do not know how much delta-v would be required to do this, or even if there are any targets in favourable positions, but it would (to my untrained eye) be an excellent reuse of what has proven itself to be a very capable spacecraft.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
jasedm
post Apr 24 2012, 08:33 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 655
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



No chance of Messenger spiralling sunwards I suppose, and snapping some solar limb movies on the way in ???
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Apr 24 2012, 10:56 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2530
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



Moving into a gravity well is just as hard as getting out.

You've all seen those spiral wishing wells for coins:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3449/328365...e235f0e17_o.jpg

Moving in or out of a gravity well requires propulsion in proportion to the local slope, which gets steepest at the center. A minimum-energy trajectory from Uranus to Neptune would require little impulse. Going from Mercury to the Sun would require more propulsion than any other two-body cruise in the solar system. Going from Earth to the Sun would require more energy than from the Earth to any other object in the universe. (Of course, a cruise from Earth to another galaxy would take a long TIME, but not as much energy as a cruise to the Sun.)

This is a key reason why it took so long to follow up on Mariner 10 and why Messenger utilized so many gravity assists.

Moreover, there's nothing much that Messenger could do in solar observation that a much bigger earthbound telescope can't do better from three times further away.

Finally, the planet itself has a nontrivial escape velocity. It's only slightly less than Mars's.

There's one intriguing science target left for Messenger, and that's Mercury itself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Seryddwr   The end of MESSENGER's mission   Apr 21 2012, 10:08 AM
- - Paolo   with all the oxidizer used during the latest orbit...   Apr 21 2012, 10:57 AM
- - Paolo   I have checked the biography of spaceflight mechan...   Apr 21 2012, 11:07 AM
- - Phil Stooke   Impact on Mercury is the final act of Messenger...   Apr 21 2012, 12:28 PM
- - Seryddwr   Thanks both for your replies. It's sad in one...   Apr 21 2012, 12:50 PM
- - Bill Harris   I imagine that having perfected the Skeet Shooting...   Apr 21 2012, 09:19 PM
- - brellis   Just for curiosity's sake, how far away from t...   Apr 22 2012, 01:56 AM
- - Phil Stooke   Most likely it could do no more than limp into a s...   Apr 22 2012, 03:17 AM
- - Paolo   digging in my library I have found this, from Avia...   Apr 22 2012, 09:54 AM
- - stevesliva   Any proposals they have for end of mission likely ...   Apr 24 2012, 12:12 AM
- - jasedm   No chance of Messenger spiralling sunwards I suppo...   Apr 24 2012, 08:33 PM
|- - JRehling   Moving into a gravity well is just as hard as gett...   Apr 24 2012, 10:56 PM
||- - antoniseb   QUOTE (JRehling @ Apr 24 2012, 05:56 PM) ...   May 8 2012, 09:04 PM
|- - Eutectic   QUOTE (jasedm @ Apr 24 2012, 02:33 PM) No...   May 5 2012, 05:42 PM
- - djellison   Given that it took a very large MOI burn to get IN...   Apr 24 2012, 10:38 PM
- - Explorer1   I doubt the camera is even designed to image the s...   May 6 2012, 05:24 AM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (Explorer1 @ May 5 2012, 09:24 PM) ...   May 6 2012, 05:41 PM
- - nprev   A 15 nm orbit sounds fascinating, but I wonder if ...   May 6 2012, 05:26 PM
|- - ugordan   Keep in mind MESSENGER's orbital velocity is a...   May 6 2012, 05:30 PM
- - Stu   ...and if we could find a wardrobe big enough, it ...   May 8 2012, 09:35 PM
- - brellis   It's a bit disappointing to characterize the e...   May 9 2012, 01:19 AM
- - djellison   There's no soft way of doing it. Indeed, a mo...   May 9 2012, 01:29 AM
- - Phil Stooke   If you come in slower there should be more time to...   May 9 2012, 03:41 AM
|- - Gsnorgathon   Does anyone know if any provision is being made to...   May 10 2012, 12:49 AM
- - Phil Stooke   One point about this - there's no fuel left to...   May 10 2012, 01:58 AM
|- - TheAnt   QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ May 10 2012, 03:58 A...   Oct 11 2012, 05:15 PM
- - Paolo   I have received a copy of this paper http://www.ia...   Oct 11 2012, 07:23 AM
- - Paolo   by the time of impact, solar perturbations will ha...   Oct 11 2012, 05:48 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 08:08 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.