IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
What Do We All Think...?, a collaboration of this board's users
deglr6328
post May 15 2005, 05:43 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 356
Joined: 12-March 05
Member No.: 190



I am posting this message in order to gauge how much interest there might be here in forming and organizing a sort of collaboration between users. Specifically, I am thinking of the Wikipedia. Many here must already be aware of the existence of Wikipedia and what it's all about but for those who haven't heard of it; Wikipedia is a huge collaborative project to build the world's largest online FREE encyclopedia. It already contains a vast amount of information (especially on science and technology) and is freely editable by anyone. Every time I come to Unmannedspaceflight to see what the latest news is and maybe make a couple posts I am genuinely shocked at the incredible breadth and depth of knowledge possessed by the users here. IMHO there is really an exceptionally high level enthusiast expertise here and I think it would be great if we could pool this unusual resource to contribute to a permanent public repository of that knowledge. So, here is what I propose (nothing super-formal obviously): we form a new subject (under EVA perhaps) just for talk on wikipedia collaborations, we will choose one wiki article per week (based on suggestions and a quick vote of the collaborators) for us to focus on and then we can all add our information on that particular subject while using either the talk page on wiki or the subforum here to discuss edit related issues. unsure.gif Anyway, if there is not sufficient interest here to form a real group collaboration, perhaps we can use this thread to say who we are on Wikipedia. I am Deglr6328 there as well (I know there must be others here! biggrin.gif), I've contributed a lot to the Galileo Probe article but I have very little on the actual mission science itself, I was hoping that perhaps this might be our first collaboration. So....what do we all think.....? huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post May 15 2005, 05:59 PM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



It's a good idea. MER is certainly done to death on Wiki ( and fairly well I might add ) - but there's certainly scope for missions past, present and future to be documented more verbosely.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post May 16 2005, 01:04 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



If it's verbose you want, count me in! Also include me, sign me up, and assign me a membership. Not to mention...

Seriously, though, sounds like a good idea!


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post May 16 2005, 01:26 PM
Post #4


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Perhaps we should colaborate here - then add the whole article as a combined effort under one username?

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post May 16 2005, 07:06 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (djellison @ May 16 2005, 08:26 AM)
Perhaps we should colaborate here - then add the whole article as a combined effort under one username?

Doug
*

I'd be glad to help out... just let me know what you want me to do. (I may only be a technical writer by trade, but that *does* make me a professional writer...)

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Patteroast
post May 31 2005, 10:48 AM
Post #6


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 43
Joined: 31-May 05
From: Bloomington, Minnesota
Member No.: 397



Ahh, Wikipedia's a great place, and it does seem to be lacking in information about some unmanned spacecraft. I've done some contributions to various articles about the moons of the solar system on Wikipedia, myself. The community here is obviously full of very enthusiastic and knowledgeable people, and even articles on Wikipedia that looks comprehensive could benefit from at least a proofread or fact-check from the folks over here. I think a sort of article of the week would be a great idea. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jun 2 2005, 07:36 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



I've been considering making some major changes to the Encladus article, adding some geology and interior info, based on the results of the last two flybys.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Myran_*
post Jun 10 2005, 01:23 AM
Post #8





Guests






I had a look at Titan on Wikipedia, and must agree this could be improved on:

QUOTE
Titan is the only known moon with a fully developed atmosphere that consists of more than just trace gases.


"Trace gases" thats the part of argon or neon in a thicker atmospeher like Earth or Venus, then one could add a small hint on the atmosphere for Triton.

Well I did edit it, couldnt leave poor Titan with those tracegases. cool.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Myran_*
post Jun 10 2005, 01:30 AM
Post #9





Guests






..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deglr6328
post Jun 10 2005, 05:45 AM
Post #10


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 356
Joined: 12-March 05
Member No.: 190



Ok, well its been a couple weeks since I posted this so I guess I should follow up!! blink.gif I looks like we have about 6-7 people interested so I don't really see any reason to take a vote on what article we should collaborate on for a week, instead, I think we can just rotate suggestions proceeding in order of post here. I would like to start with article "Galileo Spacecraft", I've added lots to the article but have nothing on the actual jupiter and moons science done by the probe and thus the "Science performed by the Galileo Orbiter at Jupiter" section...well.... sucks sad.gif . I think we can use this page just like the "talk" page is supposed to be used on the wiki article. Sound good? unsure.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 02:06 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.