March 4 2006 Pioneer 10 contact attempt, Any news? |
March 4 2006 Pioneer 10 contact attempt, Any news? |
Mar 6 2006, 02:07 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 12-January 06 Member No.: 644 |
The Planetary Society mentions on http://www.planetary.org/programs/projects...ate_200511.html that there would be a contact attempt with Pioneer 10 on March 4, 2006. Any information so far?
|
|
|
Mar 6 2006, 03:41 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Here's the news, and it looks like we've heard the last chirp from Pioneer 10. I just posted this update on our website.
From http://www.planetary.org/programs/projects...ate_200603.html QUOTE The Final Attempt to Contact Pioneer 10 March 6, 2006 In early March 2006, for the very last time the Earth was in a favorable position to receive Pioneer 10's radio signal. It was considered possible that Pioneer 10 would still be able to transmit, despite the age of its electronics, the extreme coldness of deep space, and the diminishing amount of electrical power on board. The Deep Space Network attempted to reacquire Pioneer 10's weak signal, with the hope, however faint, that we may yet have another data point to aid in our investigation of the Pioneers' enigmatic behavior. Pioneer Anomaly Team member Slava Turyshev reports on the outcome of this final attempt to make contact with Pioneer 10. Update from the Pioneer Anomaly Team We carried out the observations of the Pioneer 10 spacecraft, per a proposal that was approved by NASA earlier last week, on Friday and Saturday nights, March 3 and 4, 2006 (local time). Sadly, there was no real-time detection of a carrier signal from the spacecraft. We did carry out open-loop RSR [Radio Science Receiver] recordings of the two passes for archiving. We will process the recordings using parameters that would increase the resolution over the real-time spectral reporting by the receiver, and search for a signal. At this time, our team does not suspect any errors in our planning, pointing, uplink strategy, or ground receivers tuning predictions, which would explain Pioneer 10's silence. If the signal is not detected in the post-pass processing then we speculate that spacecraft components have degraded faster than was thought, or perhaps the RTG [Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator] output was no longer sufficient to power the S-band TWT [Traveling Wave Tube] amplifier. This is likely the end of this part of the Pioneer 10 story. We are now almost ready to start analysis of the entire data set that was recently assembled at JPL. --Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Mar 6 2006, 09:48 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 509 Joined: 2-July 05 From: Calgary, Alberta Member No.: 426 |
It would have taken a whole day for the signal to make the round trip... so there will be some delay associated with this.
|
|
|
Mar 6 2006, 09:52 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
It would have taken a whole day for the signal to make the round trip... so there will be some delay associated with this. Yep. That's why they needed DSN time on both March 3 and March 4. --Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Mar 7 2006, 02:34 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 903 Joined: 30-January 05 Member No.: 162 |
Beep barp bwarp . . . .
Pull-ee-az deposit a 25 cents for the next a three a minutes, thang you. bwoop, bleep, bwop hummmmmmmmmmmmmmm. |
|
|
Mar 7 2006, 09:37 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 183 Joined: 22-October 05 From: Cape Canaveral, FL Member No.: 534 |
Is the situation such that Pioneer's (both of them) power supply has dropped too low to send out a signal, or is it such that that Pioneer is too far away and the signal too weak for our largest antennas to pick it up anymore.
It was my understanding that it is the latter, and that if we had a larger DSN dish we would still be able to pick it up (this is ignoring alignments). Am I misunderstanding? Thanks! -------------------- |
|
|
Mar 8 2006, 09:22 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1276 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
Why are they trying to contact Pionner?
The klingons destroyed it. |
|
|
Mar 8 2006, 09:42 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2006, 01:03 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
Centauri Dreams has a new article which holds little prospect of a signal being detected, though you can never say never!
http://centauri-dreams.org/ Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
Mar 8 2006, 08:48 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Is the situation such that Pioneer's (both of them) power supply has dropped too low to send out a signal, or is it such that that Pioneer is too far away and the signal too weak for our largest antennas to pick it up anymore. It was my understanding that it is the latter, and that if we had a larger DSN dish we would still be able to pick it up (this is ignoring alignments). Am I misunderstanding? Thanks! I sent your question to Slava, and here's the response I got: QUOTE We think that the signal actually never left the spacecraft... See, our figures for required power to operate the transmitter are Cable loss: 1.6 W Inverter loss: 5.3 W CTRF loss: 8.5 W CTRF load: 12.4 W TRF loss: 3.4 W TRF load: 3.6 W Shunt: 1.6 W TWT: 22.3 W ------- total 58.7 W Thus, we needed total of 58.7 W power to operate the phase-lock loop at the spacecraft. At the same time, the actual RTG power is about 56.7 W, leaving us with a 2 W discrepancy, which is consistent with observed discrepancies in past readings. Our logic to still conduct this experiment was: i) this was the last ever attempt, and ii) all the numbers above are with some errors, so the hope was that we would have just enough power to initiate the contact. Unfortunately, the cold of the deep space frozen the craft prohibited us to "motivate" the craft for one last "phone call home.." . --Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Mar 9 2006, 01:16 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 183 Joined: 22-October 05 From: Cape Canaveral, FL Member No.: 534 |
I sent your question to Slava, and here's the response I got: --Emily Thanks Emily. -------------------- |
|
|
Guest_PhilCo126_* |
Aug 13 2008, 01:30 PM
Post
#12
|
Guests |
So now, exactly 40 years after TRW (Thompson-Ramo-Wooldridge) were contacted to build the spin-stabilised Pioneer F/G spacecraft, both probe have gone dark, their power source exhausted.
Last contact with Pioneer 10: 22 January 2003 ( heading towards constellation TAURUS - Bull ) Last contact with Pioneer 11: 22 November 1995 ( heading towards constellation AQUILA - Eagle ) Anyway these probes remain the true trailblazers of the Space age |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 01:07 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |