InSight landing site, Localization & views from orbiters |
InSight landing site, Localization & views from orbiters |
Dec 7 2018, 07:53 PM
Post
#1
|
||
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Hi folks,
-------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
||
Dec 7 2018, 10:24 PM
Post
#2
|
||
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10256 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
I will probably regret this, but just for the sake of having something out there, this is my guess as to the location of InSight. My circular panorama needs to be rotated a bit clockwise to fit this - its orientation was only approximate anyway. And this is not a perfect solution, but it will have to do for now. Very soon we will have a HiRISE image to show the real location. The HiRISE image number is in the file name if you save it.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
||
Dec 8 2018, 12:15 AM
Post
#3
|
||
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
I've combined the map from today's press briefing with the information in today's tweet by team member David Mimoun to locate the landing site within the ellipse. They're still not sure exactly where it is, but it's somewhere near this dot.
-------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
||
Dec 8 2018, 12:26 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Here's a full-res crop from ESP_036761_1845 that covers the same area as in Mimoun's tweet, plus the same with IRB color overlaid. The color image was missing IR data for one piece of the swath; I copied in data from the green channel to fill that gap, matching the levels.
https://planetary.s3.amazonaws.com/assets/i...45_RED_crop.png https://planetary.s3.amazonaws.com/assets/i...5_MRGB_crop.png -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Dec 8 2018, 12:47 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Also, I checked and there seems to be only one other HiRISE image that covers the same area: ESP_037262_1845
This one, very close by, was taken during the dust storm -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Dec 9 2018, 03:16 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10256 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Another candidate location which matches the panorama better than the other one, including distant features, but has a few strikes against it as well. Neither site is perfect.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Dec 9 2018, 08:05 PM
Post
#7
|
||
Member Group: Members Posts: 808 Joined: 10-October 06 From: Maynard Mass USA Member No.: 1241 |
In the immortal words of our Cartographer Phil Stooke... I'll probably regret this but...
It feels like matching features from orbit to the subtle features on this ground here is like some sort of crazy Rorschach Test... after a few hours you start believing any old theory this is North about 1000 or so pixels from Phil's Any word on the coming HiRISE image? -------------------- CLA CLL
|
|
|
||
Dec 9 2018, 08:39 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 684 Joined: 24-July 15 Member No.: 7619 |
In the immortal words of our Cartographer Phil Stooke... I'll probably regret this but... It feels like matching features from orbit to the subtle features on this ground here is like some sort of crazy Rorschach Test... after a few hours you start believing any old theory Hmm "three amigos" for the hills... Does the Insight Team have any naming conventions yet for objects? Three hills in the distance... Westerns= Buono, Brutto, Cattivo? (Good, Bad, Ugly?) Comedies= Steve Martin, Martin Short, Chevy Chase... |
|
|
Dec 13 2018, 05:37 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
HiRISE has posted image(s) of the InSight hardware on the surface:
https://www.uahirise.org/releases/insight/hardware/ As far as where that is WRT the landing ellipse: https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA22878 -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Dec 13 2018, 07:41 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Via Livio Tornabene on Twitter:
QUOTE InSight Lander: Planetographic:4.5510° N, 224.4755° W Planetocentric:4.499897° N, 135.616000° E Parachute: Planetographic:4.5424° N, 224.4707° W Planetocentric:4.491393° N, 135.620800° E Heat Shield: Planetographic:4.5570° N, 224.4640° W Planetocentric:4.505831° N, 135.627500° E My maps are here. -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Dec 14 2018, 07:07 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1089 Joined: 19-February 05 From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France Member No.: 172 |
Another candidate location which matches the panorama better than the other one, including distant features, but has a few strikes against it as well. Neither site is perfect. Phil Quite good Phil : your estimate was 300 m SSE from the real position. Congratulations |
|
|
Dec 14 2018, 06:31 PM
Post
#12
|
||
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10256 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Not good enough! Must try harder.
Here is a pre-landing image, clearer than the new image, showing the location of the lander. I registered the post-landing image with this to be sure the location is exact. This image is map-projected (north at the top). The press release image is in its non-map-projected format, slightly rotated clockwise from this. The image number is in the file name if you save it. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
||
Dec 14 2018, 09:55 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
New official locations, based on a map-projected version of the HiRISE image, courtesy of Livio:
QUOTE Lander
ocentric:135.6180° E, 4.4988° N ographic:135.6180° E, 4.5520° N Parachute ocentric:135.6227° E, 4.4903° N ographic:135.6227° E, 4.5434° N Backshell ocentric:135.6224° E, 4.4905° N ographic:135.6224° E, 4.5436° N Heat Shield ocentric:135.6295° E, 4.5047° N ographic:135.6295° E, 4.5580° N -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Dec 15 2018, 03:19 PM
Post
#14
|
|||
Member Group: Members Posts: 238 Joined: 15-January 13 Member No.: 6842 |
A gif of before and after the landing I just made, using https://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/ESP_037262_1845
Now let's try to spot the landscape features visible in InSight's images. [Edit] Here are some of the large-ish boulders I think I identified in sol14 panorama (using Phil Stooke's image for inlay): The boulder on the right end of the panorama is also identifiable (south of the lander) -------------------- Curiosity rover panoramas: http://www.facebook.com/CuriosityRoverPanoramas
My Photosynth panoramas: http://photosynth.net/userprofilepage.aspx...;content=Synths |
||
|
|||
Dec 17 2018, 01:26 AM
Post
#15
|
||
Member Group: Members Posts: 992 Joined: 15-June 09 From: Lisbon, Portugal Member No.: 4824 |
Here is, ready for Google Mars, an orbital map of the InSight landing area. It is a rectangle of roughly 2.82x2.56 km cropped from HiRISE image ESP_036761_1845, specifically from the Merged RGB (MRGB) product.
I registered it using the coordinates tweeted by Livio Tornabene, thank you Livio! The MRGB image has a resolution of 0.5m and Livio's coordinates' accuracy is about 6m, meaning there is room for relocation... Since the map is 34MB big I can't post it here. Instead I placed it in Google Drive, here is the link: InSight_Orbital_Map_ESP_036761_1845.kmz I also added the three hardware cutouts from ESP_058005_1845 to InSight EDL kml file. So if you dowload the above file and install it, then download and install this file InSight_EDL_Sim.kmz ( 1.3MB ) Number of downloads: 1234 you will be able to see the hardware superimposed on the orbital map, like this: You will notice some misadjustments between the HW cutouts and the base map, despite having spent several hours doing location adjustments. I think this is because, as Phil pointed out, the cutouts are not map projected. So, once the full ESP_058005_1845 image is available I may revisit this. Enjoy Fernando |
|
|
||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st November 2024 - 12:04 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |