IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

51 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Rev 49 - Aug 9-Sep 14, 2007 - Iapetus I1, The only close flyby of Iapetus
elakdawalla
post Sep 10 2007, 09:39 PM
Post #76


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Here's an attempt at stereo on the ridge. Did I do this right? I'm never really sure if I've assembled stereo images correctly; my eyes always give me topo-from-shading and I have trouble looking past that unless things REALLY leap out. The two images I used were
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...iImageID=126188
and
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...iImageID=126214
Attached Image


--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Sep 10 2007, 09:58 PM
Post #77


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3231
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



You may need to rotate them so that they are both pointed north up. However, I am not sure there is enough difference between the geometry of the two images. I am assuming you used the two frames from SATUSHINE001? The sub-s/c longitude changed by 1/2 of a degree between the two. I would wait until the WAC from ORSHIRES001 - trigger number 2901 comes down. That would make a much better stereo pair.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Sep 10 2007, 11:27 PM
Post #78


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Yes, they're the two from SATUSHINE001; the second of them was described as "ridge stereo" so I assumed that's what they were for. But after more fiddling I'm giving up, as it seems that there just isn't enough difference between them to make the point of view any different between "left" and "right." One's 10% closer to Iapetus than the other but Cassini didn't move around the limb enough to make any difference.

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Sep 11 2007, 12:47 AM
Post #79


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2250
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...iImageID=126229
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...iImageID=126228

Less than 1500 km from Iapetus! Still trying to figure out what I'm seeing, for some reason my brain/eyes combination wants to see cones where I think I should be seeing craters.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Sep 11 2007, 12:54 AM
Post #80


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2250
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



Weird, the links to the images no longer work. Here is one of them that I managed to save before this happened:
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Sep 11 2007, 12:58 AM
Post #81


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2250
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



Direct links to the JPGs apparently work:

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...3/N00091840.jpg
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...3/N00091841.jpg
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...3/N00091842.jpg

(as should be obvious from this string of messages I'm rather excited about this wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Sep 11 2007, 01:33 AM
Post #82


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Those really are amazing!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mgrodzki
post Sep 11 2007, 01:34 AM
Post #83


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 121
Joined: 26-September 05
From: Philadelphia
Member No.: 507



where did emily and ugordan get the hires of each filter for that crescent image? the only IR1, GRE and UV files i saw were pretty lo-res.


--------------------
………………………………………
http://www.chopshopstore.com
http://www.wanderingspace.net
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Sep 11 2007, 01:52 AM
Post #84


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



Just stunning. The words "very old" keep coming to mind.

Whatever is making it black must be something akin to electrostatic molecular coating. Even the finest dust or other particles after all these eons would show some kind of accumulation. All we see are raw untouched ancient crater fields.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mchan
post Sep 11 2007, 01:56 AM
Post #85


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 599
Joined: 26-August 05
Member No.: 476



Reminds me of the closeups of the similarly battered limb of Dione, where as Dione's surface looked like ice, Iapetus's surface looks like rock.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Sep 11 2007, 02:01 AM
Post #86


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3231
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (mgrodzki @ Sep 10 2007, 06:34 PM) *
where did emily and ugordan get the hires of each filter for that crescent image? the only IR1, GRE and UV files i saw were pretty lo-res.

They probably did what I did, combined each color filter image with the full-res, clear filter image.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post Sep 11 2007, 02:03 AM
Post #87


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



N00091839.jpg is also accessible by a direct link.

The limb here is MUCH smoother than in 91840, to the "right" of the bellyband and near the start of the high latitude light terrain.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mgrodzki
post Sep 11 2007, 02:06 AM
Post #88


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 121
Joined: 26-September 05
From: Philadelphia
Member No.: 507



combined them?… that is probably where any abilty i have to do this stuff drops off. i am only combining the IR, GRE and UV into the R, G, B channels in photoshop.

< place embarrassed emoticon here >


--------------------
………………………………………
http://www.chopshopstore.com
http://www.wanderingspace.net
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Sep 11 2007, 02:09 AM
Post #89


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3231
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



ed, where did that image come from... rolleyes.gif unsure.gif


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post Sep 11 2007, 02:14 AM
Post #90


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



Because I cannot now open the mid-sized image for the most recent narrow angle frames (as noted above), and then get to their full-rez raw frames, I opened the raw for

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...3/N00091828.jpg

and changed the last digits in the address bar to 39 and hit "enter".

Voila.

I just tried looking for the next WA frame after W00035137 and get "The Page You Requested Is Not Available", so we can work around bugs or whatever in the software but not "cheat" and get files that aren't there yet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

51 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 11:47 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.