IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Spacecraft Health, A cause for concern?
jasedm
post Jul 1 2008, 12:53 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 655
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



I generally read most of the significant events (S.E) reports that are posted on the Cassini-Huygens website, and the spacecraft is always described as being in excellent health and operating normally.
The reason for this post is that the latest S.E report see here states:

"AACS is continuing to investigate the significant change in RWA-2 friction test results. This has not affected any overall pointing or other spacecraft performance to date"

As I understand it, there are four RWA (reaction wheel assemblies) which control attitude and pointing when thrusters are not used. Three of the RWA's are used at any one time. RWA-3 was switched to RWA-4 in July 2003 after problems with 'oscillations' leaving three usable RWA's.
If RWA-2 is also experiencing problems, is this a cause for concern re: future spacecraft science, as a failure would result in having to use the reaction control subsystem (i.e thrusters), with subsequent loss of some pointing/stabilisation accuracy, and the much-increased depletion of consumables.

On the first day of the extended mission, should we be:

1) Concerned like hell for some of the XM science
2) A little concerned, consumable use may rule out an XXM in the event of RWA-2 failing, but the XM is safe
3) A little worried, but the problem can be worked around with other in-built subsystem redundancy
3) Not worried at all - Jase should stop being a panic-merchant and lie down in a darkened room with a beer and some soothing music

unsure.gif


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 1 2008, 01:21 PM
Post #2


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Don't think it's too scary yet. If they lose another RWA, I presume that would mean that they'd have to augment maneuvers with the thrusters, but only along one plane; not nearly as bad in terms of propellant consumption as having to use the RCS for all attitude positioning.

I was sort of amazed to learn from that update that the main engine cover has completed 40 cycles since launch. That is really impressive for a moving part that's been directly exposed to space for twelve years!


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Del Palmer
post Jul 1 2008, 05:04 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 213
Joined: 21-January 07
From: Wigan, England
Member No.: 1638



QUOTE (jasedm @ Jul 1 2008, 01:53 PM) *
3) Not worried at all - Jase should stop being a panic-merchant and lie down in a darkened room with a beer and some soothing music unsure.gif


That sounds like a great option, regardless of the outcome! smile.gif




--------------------
"I got a call from NASA Headquarters wanting a color picture of Venus. I said, “What color would you like it?” - Laurance R. Doyle, former JPL image processing guy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PDP8E
post Mar 20 2012, 10:31 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 808
Joined: 10-October 06
From: Maynard Mass USA
Member No.: 1241



Cassini plasma spectrometer is working again after nine months off line.
details...
http://news.yahoo.com/instrument-cassini-c...-204927160.html


--------------------
CLA CLL
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 11:32 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.