IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

21 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Perseverance - Early Drives, Sols 14-72
Explorer1
post Mar 6 2021, 03:30 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



In the telecon yesterday they made clear that they will be staying away from any EDL hardware for contamination reasons.
We'd all like to see it, but Oppy's encounter was a confluence of circumstances. All the hardware was visible as soon as they left Eagle crater, the heat shield was right on the traverse path from Endurance crater, and there were far fewer concerns about close proximity negatively affecting the science mission.

Look on the bright size; Mastcam-Z allows imaging at a distance with much more detail (if local topography allows), so no need to get super-close.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vikingmars
post Mar 6 2021, 03:36 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1083
Joined: 19-February 05
From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France
Member No.: 172



QUOTE (Steve G @ Mar 6 2021, 04:15 PM) *
You'd think the Blue path would be more interesting with a large crater and the heat shield not far off the path that I'm certain the engineers would like to have a peek at.

Yes for sure smile.gif
But also, like many, I would like a visit to see (even from a distance) the colorful parachute and its backshell.
This would be a great opportunity for Education & Public Outreach and would offer the public great memorable pictures to see.
And we will not have other opportunities to take such impressive pictures for decades to come smile.gif smile.gif smile.gif
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Mar 6 2021, 03:43 PM
Post #18


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



QUOTE (Marvin @ Mar 6 2021, 03:27 PM) *
“But perhaps the most visible change is in the grousers. They are ten percent taller and run across the width of the wheel in a near straight line. It’s got a slight curvature to it to help give some strength to it,” says JPL engineer Patrick DeGrosse.


That Percy wheel looks pretty good for doing 60Km.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
erwan
post Mar 6 2021, 04:43 PM
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 180
Joined: 31-January 05
From: Brittany (France)
Member No.: 164



It seems Perseverance is now roughly 30 metres NNE of Octavia E. Butler site : the blue path is maybe already the chosen path.


--------------------

Erwann
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
erwan
post Mar 6 2021, 06:00 PM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 180
Joined: 31-January 05
From: Brittany (France)
Member No.: 164



I think here is approximately the location of Perseverance after sol 15 drive, marked in a sol 11 left mastcam Z image.
Attached Image




--------------------

Erwann
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
neo56
post Mar 6 2021, 06:12 PM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 809
Joined: 3-June 04
From: Brittany, France
Member No.: 79



Picture taken by Navcam Right on sol 15 showing tracks left by tosol drive.

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Mar 6 2021, 06:34 PM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



Why are they avoiding the area directly to the west?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
erwan
post Mar 6 2021, 06:41 PM
Post #23


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 180
Joined: 31-January 05
From: Brittany (France)
Member No.: 164



Alan, maybe they want to avoid sand dunes traverse ?


--------------------

Erwann
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Mar 6 2021, 06:48 PM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



From the MRO images, it seems like there is room between the ripples to maneuver (it's not a solid field like what Curiosity had to go around to reach Mount Sharp), but presumably the team does not want to take even a small risk at this stage of the mission.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marvin
post Mar 6 2021, 06:59 PM
Post #25


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 102
Joined: 12-August 12
Member No.: 6540



Looks like they're sticking to the "Smooth Unit" and avoiding the "Fractured Unit".

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MarkL
post Mar 6 2021, 07:39 PM
Post #26


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 240
Joined: 18-July 06
Member No.: 981



QUOTE (Steve G @ Mar 6 2021, 04:15 PM) *
You'd think the Blue path would be more interesting with a large crater and the heat shield not far off the path that I'm certain the engineers would like to have a peek at.

Definitely a "Blue" fan too. The crater is like an amphitheater with a view into the layer underlying the main delta. Also smoother driving and will let them make faster progress. I'd love to see photos of the heat shield in its new forever home even from a distance - good test of the zoom cams.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Mar 6 2021, 08:37 PM
Post #27


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10151
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



This is not the main traverse - they are looking for a place to drop the Belly Pan (which protected Ingenuity from the landing event), and will then return to a smooth area near the landing site to do the helicopter tests. Only after that will the main traverse begin.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Mar 6 2021, 08:56 PM
Post #28


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10151
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



In the absence of Navcam panoramas for each location I am using rather rough Hazcam reprojections to find the points to plot on the map. Here are the sol 14 and sol 15 images.

I think Erwan's site is very good.

Phil


Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
erwan
post Mar 6 2021, 09:36 PM
Post #29


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 180
Joined: 31-January 05
From: Brittany (France)
Member No.: 164



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Mar 6 2021, 09:56 PM) *
In the absence of Navcam panoramas for each location I am using rather rough Hazcam reprojections to find the points to plot on the map. Here are the sol 14 and sol 15 images.

I think Erwan's site is very good.

Phil


Attached Image

Thank you Phi for your comment ; and there is also an helicopter...


--------------------

Erwann
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andreas Plesch
post Mar 7 2021, 03:06 AM
Post #30


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 248
Joined: 25-February 21
From: Waltham, Massachussetts, U.S.A.
Member No.: 8974



I have updated my interactive map based on EDL downlook at

http://bit.ly/PercyMAP

with an animation showing the traverse. It is based on geojson path data from the Where is the rover page. The azimuth of the rover is following the path. That means that the first 150 degree turn is not represented.

The way point geojson from the web page has additional yaw orientation data and shows for the current position a yaw of 88 degrees which I think corresponds to the front being pointed to the east. Is that what the latest camera images show ? Was there some turning in place on the final position of the last drive ?

[edit] The answer was yes. But the traverse continued more on a 72 track. I updated again http://bit.ly/PercyMAP .


--------------------
--
Andreas Plesch, andreasplesch at gmail dot com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

21 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 01:39 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.