IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

28 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Dust Storm- Opportunity EOM, the end of the beginning of a new era in robotic spaceflight
Dalhousie
post Jun 10 2018, 11:01 PM
Post #16


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 19-February 16
Member No.: 7903



QUOTE (djellison @ Jun 10 2018, 09:34 PM) *
Moreover - it's not dust 'fall' that hits the arrays - it's just blowing around and sometimes you get some. Tilting at a large angle may actually put your arrays facing upwind and cause more harm than good.


Dust collects on upwind slopes, not downwind.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Jun 10 2018, 11:11 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



Sure, my question was not about managing the situation right now, so academic in that sense. That's good information on the sandy stuff sliding on dangerous slopes, thanks. Just one thing I'd like to add: the solar panels however they are supported must have some some natural vibration frequencies. If it were possible to drive those natural oscillations the amplitude might be enhanced to the point where more dust slides.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsophile
post Jun 10 2018, 11:38 PM
Post #18


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 507
Joined: 10-September 08
Member No.: 4338



Is it still true that the prevailing wind is upslope?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jun 11 2018, 12:30 AM
Post #19


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (ngunn @ Jun 10 2018, 03:11 PM) *
If it were possible to drive those natural oscillations the amplitude might be enhanced to the point where more dust slides.


They wobble - yes - and that's caused sand to slide down them driving on dangerously steep slopes in the past.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jun 11 2018, 12:43 AM
Post #20


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (Dalhousie @ Jun 10 2018, 04:01 PM) *
Dust collects on upwind slopes, not downwind.


That's a rather simplified view of what really occurs

Papers like this : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/esp.1272 : go into it in more detail.

Moreover - the rover itself presents a topographic feature to the oncoming wind, whatever angle it comes from.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pioneer
post Jun 11 2018, 12:55 AM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 8-June 04
Member No.: 80



Thanks. I thought I saw an image taken by one of the MER rovers during a dust storm.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James Sorenson
post Jun 11 2018, 01:15 AM
Post #22


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 21-December 07
From: Clatskanie, Oregon
Member No.: 3988



Oppy as well as Spirit did take some images of the ground to monitor pebble movement and images of the horizon during the 07 global storm when power conditions allowed it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Jun 11 2018, 03:49 AM
Post #23


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



Yep. Spirit provided a sequence of images that provided a short movie of dust ripples in motion, but I think this was taken towards the end of the storm as the intensity of the dust diminished.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jun 11 2018, 04:23 AM
Post #24


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



This mosaic is from Opportunity
https://www.nasa.gov/images/content/182691m...er-20070719.jpg
during the 2007 storm.

They were able to execute simple Pancam observations briefly during that storm. However - even if the tau were the same now, Opportunity would be in worse shape for all sorts of reasons (11 year older batteries, on a slope, it's not high summer ).

However - the tau is a lot LOT worse right now. We've seen both record high tau's, and record low power. The vehicle is facing conditions we just have no experience with.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James Sorenson
post Jun 11 2018, 04:36 AM
Post #25


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 21-December 07
From: Clatskanie, Oregon
Member No.: 3988



I am curious if the full frame wide range tau images that have been coming down shows any trace of the solar disk in the original data products, Doug? And if so, can a current estimated Tau be worked out from them, heard anything? smile.gif Mark's site was last updated on 5106 when the last visible solar disk images were taken.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deimos
post Jun 11 2018, 11:49 AM
Post #26


Martian Photographer
***

Group: Members
Posts: 352
Joined: 3-March 05
Member No.: 183



Hoping to see some new values added to that site soon. The combination of data from which tau may not be automatically extracted and a newsworthy event may require some permission to restart the updates.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Jun 11 2018, 12:15 PM
Post #27


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



QUOTE (djellison @ Jun 11 2018, 04:23 AM) *
However - the tau is a lot LOT worse right now. We've seen both record high tau's, and record low power. The vehicle is facing conditions we just have no experience with.

The Tau is about double the worst experienced by Opportunity during the last storm. With the current orientation what is the correlation between tau and Whr generated? Since the attenuation of sunlight through the atmosphere is essentially exp(-tau) the observed light intensity with tau around 10.8 must be negligible.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deimos
post Jun 11 2018, 07:32 PM
Post #28


Martian Photographer
***

Group: Members
Posts: 352
Joined: 3-March 05
Member No.: 183



I suppose since the news is here, it is on the plot here.

I did a very simple 2-stream model, and you can approximate total insolation (proportional to array W-hrs/sol) as varying with exp(-tau*gamma), where gamma is 0.35-0.40 or so. If you compare two sols, that's exp(-delta_tau*gamma). A lot of the extinction goes into sky light, but total light is still much reduced. At these taus, tilt is a small perturbation, I'd guess. (A chunk of sky is blocked, but that chunk is the source of a small fraction of light, and the tilt hasn't changed.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jun 11 2018, 07:47 PM
Post #29


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4245
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (Deimos @ Jun 11 2018, 08:32 PM) *
A lot of the extinction goes into sky light, but total light is still much reduced.

I guess there isn't much data from the ground during dust storms to say very accurately how much reduced the total light is. Technically the tau itself tells you how much darker the sun has become, but as Deimos says some of that will be scattered to the ground via the sky.

Anyway of course we don't need to do full scattering calculations, since what really matters is array power, which is known (if not publicly).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MoreInput
post Jun 11 2018, 07:49 PM
Post #30


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 194
Joined: 3-January 10
Member No.: 5156



I just can't believe how fast the tau increased. Over the years it oscillated just below 1, and now within 8 sols it increased by 18 times.


--------------------
Need more input ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

28 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th March 2024 - 07:40 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.