IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

MARVEL - a missed opportunity?
just-nick
post Jan 27 2011, 05:23 AM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 27
Joined: 13-November 05
From: Edmonds, Washington
Member No.: 552



Looking at the instrument fit of the new Mars Trace Gas Orbiter - and in particular at MATMOS - I can't but notice a similarity to the MARVEL mission proposed back in 2002. There's precious little available about MARVEL online, but this description covers it quickly:

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/2002/release_2002_219.cfm

MARVEL would have taken an occultation FTIR much like MATMOS along with a limb photography camera to spot dust. It also would have brought along a submillimeter spectrometer.

So here's the question I ask (discuss away...):

Given the recent popularity of Martian methane, was it a mistake not to fly MARVEL? How much further along would we be if it had flown in 2007 with an instrument suite that included an instrument so similar to the TGO's flagship tool? And does anyone have any more information about this mission?

Cheers,

--Nick
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
mwolff
post Feb 16 2011, 06:49 PM
Post #2


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 50
Joined: 16-January 06
Member No.: 646



The current MATMOS does not differ dramatically from that proposed in the Mars Scout Program (don't have details at my finger tips, sorry). As an aside, to label the current state of a methane detection on Mars as "definitive" is an overstatement. Its status is probably more accurately described using words such as "reported" and "controversial"...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 03:38 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.