Another Jupiter impact? |
Another Jupiter impact? |
Jun 8 2010, 12:48 PM
Post
#31
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 910 Joined: 4-September 06 From: Boston Member No.: 1102 |
I was sure you all had inside information—I'm totally disillusioned
I'm not sure anyone who posts at UMSF is patient—sort of antithetical to being curious: Curious / Eager -------------------- vs ------------------- Disengaged / Dead Impatient / Intense --------------------------------------Patient / Clueless Are we there yet -------------------- |
|
|
Guest_Sunspot_* |
Jun 16 2010, 01:33 PM
Post
#32
|
Guests |
HST image released, no sign of the impact.
http://www.hubblesite.org/newscenter/archi...s/2010/20/full/ But look at all those dark spots popping up at the bottom of the SEB!!!! |
|
|
Jun 16 2010, 02:41 PM
Post
#33
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 149 Joined: 18-June 08 Member No.: 4216 |
I wonder if the possibility of this being a very bright bolt of lightning has been looked at and rejected.
To the unititiated, it is not obvious that a bolt of lightning of this magnitude (ie optical energy) would be more unlikely than a fireball of the same energy. |
|
|
Jun 16 2010, 03:53 PM
Post
#34
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1423 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 |
Lightning has been observed on Jupiter before, but only by spacecraft that are both there, and looking at the planet's night side.
Jovian lightning simply isn't strong eough to view from across the solar system (with current technology at least), and especially in the illuminated hemisphere. -------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
Jun 16 2010, 04:40 PM
Post
#35
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 648 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Subotica Member No.: 384 |
I'm having trouble with seeing images on HST site.
Can anybody post that new image of Jupiter here at UMSF or link to anywhere else? Thank you! OK I find it somewhere. http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/heic1010/ That works for me. This post has been edited by Toma B: Jun 16 2010, 04:47 PM -------------------- The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr... |
|
|
Jun 16 2010, 06:43 PM
Post
#36
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 149 Joined: 18-June 08 Member No.: 4216 |
Lightning has been observed on Jupiter before, but only by spacecraft that are both there, and looking at the planet's night side. Jovian lightning simply isn't strong eough to view from across the solar system (with current technology at least), and especially in the illuminated hemisphere. Do you know of a paper or report where someone has done the sums and concluded that it would simply be too faint? Remember, Jupiter is 5 times as far away from the sun as the Earth, hence its surface brightness, given the same albedo, should be 25 times fainter than that of the Earth. The answer to the question is not obvious. We need a jovian lightning expert.. |
|
|
Jun 16 2010, 07:12 PM
Post
#37
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10154 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
How about this?
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/scien..._missingdebris/ It doesn't give you the math, but clearly experts have thought about it. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Jun 16 2010, 07:51 PM
Post
#38
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1423 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 |
IIRC, the they first attempted to image lightning on Jupiter's night side with Galileo, they did not set the exposure right and the light reflecting off Io oversaturated the images.
-------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
Jun 16 2010, 11:16 PM
Post
#39
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 149 Joined: 18-June 08 Member No.: 4216 |
|
|
|
Jun 16 2010, 11:50 PM
Post
#40
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 699 Joined: 3-December 04 From: Boulder, Colorado, USA Member No.: 117 |
IIRC, the they first attempted to image lightning on Jupiter's night side with Galileo, they did not set the exposure right and the light reflecting off Io oversaturated the images. Actually those moonlit images successful detected lightning- see here. There are other Galileo lightning images too, in addition to those from Voyager, New Horizons and perhaps (I'm not sure) Cassini. John |
|
|
Jun 17 2010, 12:10 AM
Post
#41
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1582 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
It doesn't give you the math, but clearly experts have thought about it. Eh. I think someone probably figured you can't see garden-variety lightning because it would have been seen already as it is so frequent. I think some people who study transient luminous events (sprites/jets/elves) might think it looks interesting, although it's extremely bright, a bit long-lived and immensely large. A TLE's worth thinking about, but the only way you'd convince people that this was one was to see more of them. Doesn't look like plain old lightning. |
|
|
Jun 17 2010, 12:21 AM
Post
#42
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Frankly, you'd also think that TLEs would occur far more frequently if this event in fact was one. Jupiter is under almost constant observation by amateurs with professional-grade equipment; we should have seen a few more of these over the past five years or so, at least.
Still, it's certainly valid to explore reasonable alternative explanations for this observation. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jun 17 2010, 02:55 AM
Post
#43
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2998 Joined: 30-October 04 Member No.: 105 |
I'm still thinking that cohesive rocky body, behaving like a rifle bullet and punching through the upper cloud deck and disintegrating at a lower level, is the most reasonable explanation. Remember, the SEB has faded and we are seeing a lot of obscuring high-altitude cirrus clouds.
--Bill -------------------- |
|
|
Aug 22 2010, 09:48 PM
Post
#44
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Fresh off the presses of Volcanopele's Gish Bar Times: another probable Jupiter impact observed yesterday! Story & links:
http://www.gishbartimes.org/2010/08/meteor...n-jupiters.html EDIT: Not yesterday...20 Aug around 1822 UTC. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Aug 22 2010, 10:00 PM
Post
#45
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3233 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Well, yesterday-ish. It was recorded Saturday morning in Japan.
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st May 2024 - 01:59 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |