IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

16 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
High altitude balloon payload, from Sable-3 discussion
jamescanvin
post Sep 28 2007, 12:41 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Great info AndyG.

Looking at some of the other folk who have done stuff like this, 30 - 35km seems to be reasonable.

Surely we've got to be aiming for the 32km 'Mars surface pressure' mark. smile.gif

J


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 28 2007, 12:57 PM
Post #17


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



At that level it's a little bit about luck - but I'd say the 30km, 100kft, 10% air pressure, mars air pressure type level is a sensible ultimate goal. Maybe not first time around - but eventually.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Sep 28 2007, 01:43 PM
Post #18


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



Hey Doug...what do you think of this first approach to a possible name anf badge for the project?... wink.gif

On following opportunities we could follow this policy and use our beloved ones names...I'm sure each launch would have a distinct personality... rolleyes.gif

Attached Image


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 28 2007, 02:04 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (helvick @ Sep 27 2007, 05:20 PM) *
I think that a 2 camera approach is a very good idea. I'm torn between having them pointed in such a way that stitched panoramas are possible versus having them pointed so that we optimize the probability of getting a wider range of individual shots.


Hopefully even with just one camera some nice panoramas will be possible.

Some quick tests:

Nova - images taken 15 seconds apart - altitude change 300ft - altitude 100,000ft
Attached Image


Even at low altitudes and with large time intervals this can still be done.
SABLE-3 - images taken 1 minute apart - altitude change 800ft - altitude (above ground) 10,000ft
Attached Image


If we had two cameras I'd vote for one pointing horizontally and one pointed down at 45 degrees and turned 90 degrees 'portrait', which should give maximum coverage.

It may take a while to sort through the images but with a couple of cameras like this firing quite frequently some pretty spectacular stuff should be possible. smile.gif

James


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Sep 28 2007, 02:05 PM
Post #20


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Nice logo, ustrax! smile.gif

Just a general engineering note based on AndyG's terrific table: need to determine an optimum rate of climb (ideally, maximized) in order to minimize thermal effects on the electronics, unless the payload will be environmentally controlled. Major trade-off in all areas is, of course, that more payload weight equals less achievable altitude...


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 28 2007, 02:23 PM
Post #21


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Payload wouldn't be thermally 'controlled' per.se - but something like a foam (there's 3cm thick foil covered foam available at my DIY store) cube which would thermally insulate it from the cold - and then the electronics inside would hopefully keep it fairly warm simply by using up the Whr's.

I knew someone would start thinking of logo's and names before we got too far smile.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 28 2007, 02:38 PM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



One more stitching test using the SABLE-3 images. These images are fully 6 minutes and 6,400ft apart and still stitch nicely. With two cameras taking pictures 15 seconds apart and we could have 50 images within this time frame, nice. smile.gif

Attached Image


James

EDIT: just came across this page of records for this sort of thing - http://showcase.netins.net/web/wallio/ARHABrecords.htm


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Sep 28 2007, 02:43 PM
Post #23


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



You know how this guys are Doug... tongue.gif

Seing those images I can't avoid to think about something I already made reference here, I would L-O-V-E to see some video footage with sound...what are the major constraints for something of that nature?...


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 28 2007, 03:13 PM
Post #24


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Storage, Volume, Mass, Power, Money smile.gif If you can find a small digital camera that can take movies of approx 2 hours onto SD card etc, and last that long on the battery, that's small enough (10 x 10 x 3 cm sort of size) and light enough (<300g) - then maybe. While movies are cool - I think I'd rather have mega-pixel stills than a lower res movie ( although both would be cool.)


Real time video transmission is possible but typically not further than 5km with the transmisison power allowed by the radio spectrum laws.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Sep 28 2007, 03:57 PM
Post #25


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



QUOTE (djellison @ Sep 28 2007, 07:23 AM) *
Payload wouldn't be thermally 'controlled' per.se - but something like a foam (there's 3cm thick foil covered foam available at my DIY store) cube which would thermally insulate it from the cold...

Doug



Yeah, that'd help. Main concern here is electrical connectors. Probably a good idea to seal them with ScotchGard or RTV, which in addition to adding another insulation layer to minimize thermal contraction/expansion would also prevent moisture intrusion/condensation.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Sep 28 2007, 04:51 PM
Post #26


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1624
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



Hi - this link has a nice high altitude photo from the Edge Of Space Sciences balloon group:

http://www.eoss.org/ansrecap/ar_030/recap13.htm


--------------------
Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Sep 28 2007, 04:51 PM
Post #27


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



One possibility might be to put all the batteries in a custom battery harness which is itself inside a small thermos. That should keep them from getting too cold during the trip up. The downside will be making sure that all the connections are nice and tight.

Yet another possibility would be to put a small "box" of solar panels around any package. At least one of the panels would be pointed towards the sun and delivering power. But then you gotta deal with transformers, etc.

-Mike


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Sep 28 2007, 05:36 PM
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2530
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



[...]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 28 2007, 05:55 PM
Post #29


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Actually - the altitude will be limited by the envelope which seem to always burst at 80-110kft

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Sep 28 2007, 06:08 PM
Post #30


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Good point, Doug. However, ascent velocity is still contrained by payload weight, so it's still a significant consideration. For recovery purposes, seems like you want to get up & down as rapidly as possible in order to limit your touchdown CEP.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

16 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th April 2024 - 05:53 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.