After Pluto... |
After Pluto... |
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Jan 16 2006, 09:56 PM
Post
#16
|
Guests |
QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Jan 16 2006, 07:37 PM) Here's some real heresy: Why flyby Pluto when more interesting KBOs will likely be discovered between now and 2015? Can NH be retargeted for them? How about some of the interesting ones we know now, including the one that is bigger than Pluto (I will NOT say its unofficial name)? I think we should use Jupiter to whip NH out of the ecliptic to it. Aside from the power issues mentioned previously, your idea, in addition to being "heresy," doesn't make a whole lot of scientific sense. The Pluto flyby alone will allow for exploration of four KBOs (Pluto, Charon, S/2005 P1 and S/2005 P2). You want to give up that opportunity to fly to a "more interesting" (whatever that means) KBO? And one that is further away?
|
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Jan 16 2006, 09:58 PM
Post
#17
|
Guests |
QUOTE (mchan @ Jan 16 2006, 09:52 PM) After Jupiter, there are no gas giants to help further on the way to Pluto. Beyond Pluto, there are no known gas giants. Yeah, I seem to recall from Astronomy 101 the following progression: Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and then Pluto
|
|
|
Guest_exobioquest_* |
Jan 17 2006, 05:21 AM
Post
#18
|
Guests |
Hey, be nice and answer stupid question like they are smart ones, respect the retarded and you will be blessed with good karma.
So what’s the max life span of NH? Expected to die in?... 2020,2025,2030, when? How much power would it need to run a minimum of instruments (say for heliopause observations, if any instrument on board can do that)? How far would it get roughly by then? |
|
|
Jan 17 2006, 06:53 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 362 Joined: 12-June 05 From: Kiama, Australia Member No.: 409 |
QUOTE (exobioquest @ Jan 17 2006, 04:21 PM) Hey, be nice and answer stupid question like they are smart ones, respect the retarded and you will be blessed with good karma. So what’s the max life span of NH? Expected to die in?... 2020,2025,2030, when? How much power would it need to run a minimum of instruments (say for heliopause observations, if any instrument on board can do that)? How far would it get roughly by then? Just roughly from memory. Power at launch is just over 200w and it degrades at 3.5w/year. Minimum power required to operate is 100w? I dont know what it will be able to run on this. So lifespan about 25 years. Even at Pluto flighby it will be down to about 190-200w and not enough to run all instruments at the same time |
|
|
Guest_Analyst_* |
Jan 17 2006, 08:51 AM
Post
#20
|
Guests |
Power at Launch is about 240w. I believe Alan Stern posted here 190w are needed to operate including the science instruments (encounter). No idea about the minimum power needed just to live.
|
|
|
Jan 17 2006, 08:58 AM
Post
#21
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
Jan 17 2006, 09:38 AM
Post
#22
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
My understanding is that they were able to get more plutonium than they expected to after all the security-screwup work-stoppages at Los Alamos, but they didn't get a full load. I think they're able to do 100% duty cycle at Pluto, but the further out a KB object they flyby is, the more they'll have to cycle power usage as the levels decline.
There's also probably some small uncertainty on the degradation rate of the RTG. The half life of the plutonium is pretty well known, but much of the degradation is due to radiation damage of the bimetallic junctions in the thermocouples that generate power, and that's going to be very hardware dependent. This is a spare.. was it from Cassini?.. so that should be pretty well but not perfectly known. |
|
|
Jan 17 2006, 10:46 AM
Post
#23
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 362 Joined: 12-June 05 From: Kiama, Australia Member No.: 409 |
QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 17 2006, 07:58 PM) I dont think you've got that right. If you go back and read Alan's PI-Persp's, I see no mention of rolling instrument operation a-la Voyager. Doug It may be wrong or out of date but here is where I got the info http://www.spaceflightnow.com/atlas/av010/...spacecraft.html QUOTE Typical of RTG-based systems, as on past outer-planet missions, New Horizons does not have a battery for storing power. At the start of the mission, the RTG will supply approximately 240 watts (at 30 volts of direct current) - the spacecraft's shunt regulator unit maintains a steady input from the RTG and dissipates power the spacecraft cannot use at a given time. By July 2015 (the earliest Pluto encounter date) that supply decreases to 200 watts at the same voltage, so New Horizons will ease the strain on its limited power source by cycling science instruments during planetary encounters.
|
|
|
Jan 17 2006, 11:16 AM
Post
#24
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 809 Joined: 11-March 04 Member No.: 56 |
QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Jan 16 2006, 07:37 PM) Here's some real heresy: Why flyby Pluto when more interesting KBOs will likely be discovered between now and 2015? Can NH be retargeted for them? How about some of the interesting ones we know now, including the one that is bigger than Pluto Pluto is still the most interesting KBO out there -- if only because we know a little bit more about it than the other ones. I think that a very distant, very cold, rather small planet that still somehow manages to have an atmosphere has got to have interesting things going on on it. |
|
|
Jan 17 2006, 11:25 AM
Post
#25
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
It's not really a practical target untill we can lob something bigger considerably faster, but Sedna is going to eventually be a very high priority target.. Much further out, with orbital dynamics that suggest a radically different origin is possible (possible capture during stellar flyby as the star forming region the solar system formed in broke up). If nothing else, Sedna's been in a deeper freeze than anything we know other than Oort cloud comets.
|
|
|
Jan 17 2006, 02:07 PM
Post
#26
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 813 Joined: 29-December 05 From: NE Oh, USA Member No.: 627 |
Right now the Pluto/Charon binary planet is the most interesting KBO. And it should indeed remain the focus for New Horizons.... one of the big attractions at Pluto is the presence of an atmosphere that is slowly freezing out.
Note this report form http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=18769 Researchers have identified spectral features that hint at possible atmospheres on 2003 UB313 and 2005 FY9. As for what we will find out there in the Kuiper Belt as NH heads out ..... I have read some reports that believe there could be Earth sized KBO's out there.... Craig |
|
|
Jan 17 2006, 03:35 PM
Post
#27
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
This thread discussed the theory that no really large KBOs exist:
http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showtopic=1546 Of course we won't know for certain until we can send some dedicated KBO probes out there. I certainly understand that Pluto is the best known of all the KBOs, but I get the feeling there are even more interesting ones out there. Their only "flaw" is that they are more distant from Earth. -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Jan 17 2006, 03:40 PM
Post
#28
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Pluto gives us 4 bodies for the price of one, that we know to be reachable, targetable, and interesting.
To even entertain the idea of targetting elsewhere is just crazy. Doug |
|
|
Jan 17 2006, 03:55 PM
Post
#29
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 17 2006, 10:40 AM) Pluto gives us 4 bodies for the price of one, that we know to be reachable, targetable, and interesting. To even entertain the idea of targetting elsewhere is just crazy. Doug I was referring in my most recent post to later probe missions with more power, better instruments, and a future improved astronomical knowledge of other KBOs. We are just touching the tip of the iceberg with KBOs right now. And let's not forget the Oort Cloud, of which we know even less. Literally billions of worlds out there to explore, ones presumably untouched since the formation of the Sol system. Pluto and its moons are just for starters. Would this be the place to discuss what we would need in a probe to properly explore multiple KBOs? -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Jan 17 2006, 07:23 PM
Post
#30
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 599 Joined: 26-August 05 Member No.: 476 |
QUOTE (edstrick @ Jan 17 2006, 01:38 AM) My understanding is that they were able to get more plutonium than they expected to after all the security-screwup work-stoppages at Los Alamos, but they didn't get a full load. I think they're able to do 100% duty cycle at Pluto, but the further out a KB object they flyby is, the more they'll have to cycle power usage as the levels decline. Since NH is going by Pluto anyways, can't it pick up some more plutonium there? (Ducks) |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd April 2024 - 09:56 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |