IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

85 Pages V  « < 36 37 38 39 40 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Kepler Mission
Hungry4info
post Jun 23 2010, 04:47 AM
Post #556


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1419
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



This paper suggests that cold Neptunes may outweigh cold Jupiters by at least 3 to 1.

http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.1171v1


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tasp
post Jun 23 2010, 01:08 PM
Post #557


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 30-January 05
Member No.: 162



Hmph.

There goes Mother Nature messing up another perfectly good joke with actual reality.


laugh.gif



Crikey, just how many planets are we going to have to keep track of??



Oh, wait a minute, that's a good thing . . . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Habitable Zoner
post Jun 29 2010, 12:31 PM
Post #558


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 1-February 10
Member No.: 5210



Interesting paper accepted for publication in Astrobiology (Segura et al.) with implications for Kepler discoveries... It has been widely assumed that earth-like planets orbiting M dwarfs would have habitable zones lying rather too close for comfort to the star. But this study suggests that life on such a world would probably be able to weather even strong stellar flares, if one makes reasonable assumptions about the atmospheric chemistry.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Habitable Zoner
post Jul 14 2010, 02:26 AM
Post #559


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 1-February 10
Member No.: 5210



There's a new manager's update (here). I like the last sentence: "Meanwhile, the Kepler science team is busy preparing scientific papers for publication about Kepler discoveries."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Syrinx
post Jul 21 2010, 09:00 PM
Post #560


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 131
Joined: 31-May 08
From: San Carlos, California, USA
Member No.: 4168



Just want to remind Bay Area people about this lecture. It is scheduled for tonight, about 5 hours from now. I can't make it unfortunately, but hopefully somebody can and will take notes for the rest of us!


RANDALL MUSEUM ANNOUNCES
SAN FRANCISCO AMATEUR ASTRONOMERS’ LECTURE SERIES
Extrasolar Planets & NASA’s Kepler Mission
A Presentation by Dr. Jack J. Lissauer
NASA’s Ames Research Center


What: San Francisco Amateur Astronomers’ Lecture
Extrasolar Planets & NASA’s Kepler Mission
A Presentation by Dr. Jack J. Lissauer, NASA’s Ames Research Center

When: 7:30pm, Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Where: Randall Museum
199 Museum Way, SF, CA
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Byran
post Jul 24 2010, 07:49 AM
Post #561


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 68
Joined: 10-September 05
Member No.: 493



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/art...l#ixzz0ua68fFAU

QUOTE
Astronomer Dimitar Sasselov told a conference that a space telescope has uncovered 140 different planets which are around the same size as Earth.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Jul 24 2010, 07:54 AM
Post #562


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



I was going to post it too. There are a few things that I don't understand. How many Earth sized planets have been discovere? 140 or 60. are they reporting real discoveries or just projections of Kepler's capabilities? huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Byran
post Jul 24 2010, 08:05 AM
Post #563


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 68
Joined: 10-September 05
Member No.: 493



QUOTE (Paolo @ Jul 24 2010, 02:24 PM) *
I was going to post it too. There are a few things that I don't understand. How many Earth sized planets have been discovere? 140 or 60. are they reporting real discoveries or just projections of Kepler's capabilities? huh.gif



140


60 - is the expected number of analogs of the Earth (the planet the size of Earth in the habitable zone)


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brellis
post Jul 24 2010, 08:23 AM
Post #564


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 754
Joined: 9-February 07
Member No.: 1700



60 out of 140 are in the HZ? Time to change Drake's equation again smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Byran
post Jul 24 2010, 11:48 AM
Post #565


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 68
Joined: 10-September 05
Member No.: 493



QUOTE (brellis @ Jul 24 2010, 02:53 PM) *
60 out of 140 are in the HZ?


While Kepler discovery short-periodical planet, far from habited areas.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ch5MilCuxK8


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Drkskywxlt
post Jul 24 2010, 03:29 PM
Post #566


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 29-August 06
From: Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1083



These are all CANDIDATES. The Kepler team has said they expect that as many as 50% of the CANDIDATES are false alarms (eclipsing binaries, etc.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Habitable Zoner
post Jul 25 2010, 02:22 AM
Post #567


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 1-February 10
Member No.: 5210



"Despite overzealous news headlines this week, NASA's Kepler spacecraft has not indentified more than 100 Earth-like planets in the galaxy...[Dimitar] Sasselov was referencing only possible planets among the Kepler data, scientists said...'What Dimitar presented was "candidates,"' said David Koch, the mission's deputy principal investigator at NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif. 'These have the apparent signature we are looking for, but then we must perform extensive follow-up observations to eliminate false positives, such as background eclipsing binaries. This requires substantial amounts of ground-based observing which is done primarily in the summer observing season'...However, Sasselov did say that what Kepler has learned so far about extrasolar planets offers tantalizing hints that our planet may not be unusual. Among the hundreds of candidate planets, a large percentage of them appear to be Earth-like – that is, small and rocky, rather than large and gassy, like Jupiter. 'Even before we have confirmed the planets among these hundreds of candidates, we can see statistically that the smaller-sized planets will be more common than the large-sized (Jupiter- and Saturn-like ones) in the sample,' Sasselov explained...

For the complete article on Space.com, go here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 25 2010, 03:32 AM
Post #568


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Woof. They need to get rid of the term 'Earth-like' immediately & replace it with 'small & rocky', or at the very least 'Earth-sized'.

This could spin right into an unprecedented PR fiasco all too quickly.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brellis
post Jul 25 2010, 03:46 AM
Post #569


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 754
Joined: 9-February 07
Member No.: 1700



Isn't an earth-sized blink of a transiting planet much smaller than an eclipsing binary? If the dip in light is that small, are the other reasons for it? Oh, "background eclipsing binaries"... how does that create a dip that resembles an earth-sized planet? Another mystery to plague my tiny, earth-sized, amateur brain! huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tacitus
post Jul 25 2010, 05:32 AM
Post #570


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 72
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 272



QUOTE
These are all CANDIDATES. The Kepler team has said they expect that as many as 50% of the CANDIDATES are false alarms (eclipsing binaries, etc.)

That's what happens when people start quoting headlines from The Daily Mail. Never a good idea on any type of science forum.

blink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

85 Pages V  « < 36 37 38 39 40 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 06:33 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.