IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Recurring Slope Lineae (RSL) near Curiosity?, Long-range observations
climber
post Sep 7 2016, 04:27 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



More news regarding (58!) RSL "near" the rover:

http://www.nature.com/news/mars-contaminat...y-rover-1.20544


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
fredk
post Sep 7 2016, 05:57 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Remember that in last year's paper, Dundas and McEwen were clear that the candidates near MSL didn't meet the criteria for RSL's. The most RSL-like events were about 50 km from MSL, to the east, and even those didn't meet all the criteria.

Still, the real news in the Nature article is that they've been targeting the candidates with RMI. I've been meaning to ask if anyone has checked to see if any recent RMI imagery matches the candidate locations from Dundas and McEwen. One sequence with some streaks that caught my eye included this frame:
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/pr...CCAM03360L1.PNG
But comparing with this mastcam frame:
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/ms...029E01_DXXX.jpg
(the RMI field is just left of centre) it looks clear that the location is not one of the candidates of Dundas and McEwen.

PS - maybe a dedicated RSL thread would make sense, considering that potential RSL observations and discussion will probably be ongoing?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Dec 5 2016, 10:56 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



QUOTE (fredk @ Sep 7 2016, 06:57 PM) *
...
One sequence with some streaks that caught my eye included this frame:
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/pr...CCAM03360L1.PNG ...

I wonder whether those are fundamentally different from the many small landslides we have seen already along Curiosity's path. Just imagine the effect of one or more small dry landslides at the top of a higher slope.
Of course lack of evidence for liquid water in the sense of science isn't the same as definitive evidence for the absence of liquid water in the sense of PP.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 07:39 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.