Recurring Slope Lineae (RSL) near Curiosity?, Long-range observations |
Recurring Slope Lineae (RSL) near Curiosity?, Long-range observations |
Sep 7 2016, 04:27 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2920 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
More news regarding (58!) RSL "near" the rover:
http://www.nature.com/news/mars-contaminat...y-rover-1.20544 -------------------- |
|
|
Sep 7 2016, 05:57 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4246 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
Remember that in last year's paper, Dundas and McEwen were clear that the candidates near MSL didn't meet the criteria for RSL's. The most RSL-like events were about 50 km from MSL, to the east, and even those didn't meet all the criteria.
Still, the real news in the Nature article is that they've been targeting the candidates with RMI. I've been meaning to ask if anyone has checked to see if any recent RMI imagery matches the candidate locations from Dundas and McEwen. One sequence with some streaks that caught my eye included this frame: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/pr...CCAM03360L1.PNG But comparing with this mastcam frame: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/ms...029E01_DXXX.jpg (the RMI field is just left of centre) it looks clear that the location is not one of the candidates of Dundas and McEwen. PS - maybe a dedicated RSL thread would make sense, considering that potential RSL observations and discussion will probably be ongoing? |
|
|
Dec 5 2016, 10:56 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
... One sequence with some streaks that caught my eye included this frame: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/pr...CCAM03360L1.PNG ... I wonder whether those are fundamentally different from the many small landslides we have seen already along Curiosity's path. Just imagine the effect of one or more small dry landslides at the top of a higher slope. Of course lack of evidence for liquid water in the sense of science isn't the same as definitive evidence for the absence of liquid water in the sense of PP. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 07:39 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |