IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
NASA Considers Stowaway Finalists for LRO Launch
NMRguy
post Mar 27 2006, 08:36 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 98
Joined: 29-July 05
From: Amsterdam, NL
Member No.: 448



NASA reports that the rocket to carry the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter will have an extra 1000 kg available for secondary payload, and it has taken proposals for bare-bones missions to fill this space. It seems like a nice way to get some specialized science done.


http://space.com/spacenews/businessmonday_060327.html

“NASA received 19 ‘pretty freakin' exciting’ proposals within a matter of weeks, according to Borkowski, and by late February had selected four finalists for a closer look. The finalists were due to present additional information to NASA the week of March 20. Borkowski said NASA intends to make its selection by early April and give the chosen team authority to proceed."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Mar 27 2006, 08:40 PM
Post #2





Guests






The 4 concepts are named, but no details are given. I'll scrounge around on the Web and see if I can dig up any details.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Mar 27 2006, 08:51 PM
Post #3





Guests






No luck on that point. Goddard's "NASA Academy" did propose an "Easy Low-Cost Lunar Explorer" back in 1998 ( http://academy.gsfc.nasa.gov/1998/html/project.html ), and Goddard's current finalist is called the "Lunar Explorer" -- but the ELLE concept would have utilized copies of the Deep Space 2 penetrators, which aren't likely to be very popular for the purpose at this point...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 08:12 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.