IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Titan And Enceladus, 5 Feb observation
dilo
post Feb 5 2006, 10:33 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Nice RGB sequence showing Enceladus passing in front of Titan:
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...8/N00049968.jpg
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...8/N00049967.jpg
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...8/N00049966.jpg

Here the aligned RGB combination:
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
ermar
post Feb 6 2006, 04:35 AM
Post #2


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 43
Joined: 10-December 05
Member No.: 605



QUOTE
it was a good reminder for me what a small world Enceladus really are


Yep, I remember this composite of Britain and Enceladus from a while back:

Not all that big, really!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
David
post Feb 6 2006, 12:11 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 809
Joined: 11-March 04
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (ermar @ Feb 6 2006, 04:35 AM)
Yep, I remember this composite of Britain and Enceladus from a while back:

Not all that big, really!
*


Ugh. I do not like these sorts of comparisons between three-dimensional objects and two-dimensional surfaces; they are very deceptive. Yes, Enceladus would "fit inside" the island of Great Britain -- but only if it were half embedded in the earth's crust with the rest of it towering into the sky!

A better comparison is of surface area to surface area, not of spherical diameter to surface area. If you could unroll Enceladus surface onto the surface of earth, it would occupy an area slightly smaller than France and Germany combined; that is, the parts of Enceladus we can directly observe are a good deal bigger than Great Britain.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Feb 6 2006, 08:48 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (David @ Feb 6 2006, 05:11 AM)
Ugh.  I do not like these sorts of comparisons between three-dimensional objects and two-dimensional surfaces; they are very deceptive.  Yes, Enceladus would "fit inside" the island of Great Britain -- but only if it were half embedded in the earth's crust with the rest of it towering into the sky! 

A better comparison is of surface area to surface area, not of spherical diameter to surface area.  If you could unroll Enceladus surface onto the surface of earth, it would occupy an area slightly smaller than France and Germany combined; that is, the parts of Enceladus we can directly observe are a good deal bigger than Great Britain.
*

that is a much better comparison. At some talks I've given, I compared the surface area to that of Turkey. I'll dig up the graphic.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Feb 6 2006, 10:19 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Feb 6 2006, 09:48 PM)
that is a much better comparison.  At some talks I've given, I compared the surface area to that of Turkey.  I'll dig up the graphic.
*


That's a helluva size for a chicken!

GM Rhode Island Red?

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st May 2024 - 03:47 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.