IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

11 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
NH Arrokoth (formerly Ultima Thule) Encounter Observations & Results, post-flyby discussion as the data arrives
nprev
post Jan 4 2019, 01:16 AM
Post #1


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



This will be where we talk about the data as it arrives over the next 20 months or so.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roman Tkachenko
post Jan 6 2019, 02:40 AM
Post #2


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 80
Joined: 18-October 15
From: Russia
Member No.: 7822



Just made it a little smoother wink.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Jan 6 2019, 11:30 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Can we expect more images by Friday 11th?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gladstoner
post Jan 7 2019, 07:40 AM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 714
Joined: 3-January 08
Member No.: 3995



Which areas of Ultima Thule got the highest resolution coverage?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jan 7 2019, 03:39 PM
Post #5


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Posts concerning the search for a new target after Ultima Thule moved to the KBO Encounters thread. smile.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hendric
post Jan 7 2019, 04:05 PM
Post #6


Director of Galilean Photography
***

Group: Members
Posts: 896
Joined: 15-July 04
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 93



New Horizons is in solar conjunction, I think new data will be arriving next week

http://www.planetary.org/multimedia/space-...w-horizons.html

https://spacenews.com/new-horizons-complete...f-ultima-thule/
QUOTE
The science team will work with those data this week, then take a break next week when the spacecraft is in solar conjunction, with the sun blocking communications with the spacecraft. The science team will reconvene around Jan. 15, Stern said, after communications resume.


--------------------
Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
--
"The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke
Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Jan 7 2019, 10:29 PM
Post #7


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



QUOTE (Gladstoner @ Jan 7 2019, 08:40 AM) *
Which areas of Ultima Thule got the highest resolution coverage?


They did not release that information. They took one stripe of images as they did the closest flyby. Assuming it was a horizontal shot across the "center" some of Ultima ( the big lobe ), might be imaged, bearing in mind when the load was sent up they did not fully know the shape or spin rate.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
john_s
post Jan 7 2019, 11:46 PM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 700
Joined: 3-December 04
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Member No.: 117



The LORRI field of view in the highest-resolution "CA06" LORRI images is just a bit bigger than the size of the target, so with luck we could get the whole thing. The relatively slow rotation means that we'll cover much the same face as seen in the images already down, though of course from a somewhat different angle.

John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WTW
post Jan 8 2019, 08:18 AM
Post #9


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 25-December 18
Member No.: 8512



QUOTE (hendric @ Jan 7 2019, 04:05 PM) *
New Horizons is in solar conjunction, I think new data will be arriving next week


There was one more DSN downlink from NH received right after the last news conference, but that may have been mostly engineering data -- hard to tell.
(DSN Now was being flakey during that - hopefully the DSN itself wasn't, and the download went OK.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ron Hobbs
post Jan 10 2019, 04:11 AM
Post #10


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 204
Joined: 14-April 06
From: Seattle, WA
Member No.: 745



Canberra is listening and talking to New Horizons according to DSN Now.

(Rubs his hands impatiently)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nafnlaus
post Jan 10 2019, 12:19 PM
Post #11


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 137
Joined: 16-June 15
Member No.: 7507



QUOTE (Ron Hobbs @ Jan 10 2019, 04:11 AM) *
Canberra is listening and talking to New Horizons according to DSN Now.

(Rubs his hands impatiently)


Finally! Can't wait to get some new data smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vikingmars
post Jan 11 2019, 10:16 AM
Post #12


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1088
Joined: 19-February 05
From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France
Member No.: 172



An excellent article was just posted by the NH team about Ultima-Thule :
"Overview of initial results from the reconnaissance flyby of a Kuiper Belt planetesimal: 2014 MU69"
https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.02578

CONGRATULATIONS again to the NH team ftr this incredible feat ! smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pioneer
post Jan 11 2019, 05:52 PM
Post #13


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 8-June 04
Member No.: 80



Does anyone know when the next press conference will be or if it has been scheduled?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wildespace
post Jan 12 2019, 09:50 AM
Post #14


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 15-January 13
Member No.: 6842



QUOTE (vikingmars @ Jan 11 2019, 10:16 AM) *
An excellent article was just posted by the NH team about Ultima-Thule :
"Overview of initial results from the reconnaissance flyby of a Kuiper Belt planetesimal: 2014 MU69"
https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.02578

CONGRATULATIONS again to the NH team ftr this incredible feat ! smile.gif

QUOTE
Little significant color variegation across either lobe has been detected as of this writing

There's a new word I learned today - variegation.

Excited to hear all this information (however preliminary) coming in from the mission. Glad they picked up on the colour variation near the "neck".

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_alex_k_*
post Jan 13 2019, 09:47 AM
Post #15





Guests






Trying to sharpen
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jan 13 2019, 02:50 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



It's hard to know without seeing the raw images how much noise we have in these views. To me they look noisy (and we were told to expect noisy images), so I'm suspicious of the fine, pixel-scale detail. But on the other hand, the abstract cited above refers to the "mottled appearance", and the team should know whether the amplitude of that fine detail is consistent with noise or not. Or maybe by the "mottling" they mean several-pixel-scale detail? It'll be really interesting to see the closer views.

And also interesting to see higher phase angle views, to break the degeneracy between topography and albedo variations...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kenny
post Jan 13 2019, 10:00 PM
Post #17


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 550
Joined: 1-May 06
From: Scotland (Ecosse, Escocia)
Member No.: 759



The interesting light color at the "neck" might suggest there could be slight movement between the 2 component bodies, and "grinding" of relatively fresh ice in that area...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post Jan 13 2019, 11:29 PM
Post #18


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 684
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (kenny @ Jan 13 2019, 11:00 PM) *
The interesting light color at the "neck" might suggest there could be slight movement between the 2 component bodies, and "grinding" of relatively fresh ice in that area...


Anybody know which direction is "up" and which is "down" at the neck of a contact binary like UT?

How did / could that change as the binary spun-down?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JTN
post Jan 14 2019, 01:19 AM
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 200
Joined: 20-November 05
From: Mare Desiderii
Member No.: 563



QUOTE (HSchirmer @ Jan 13 2019, 11:29 PM) *
Anybody know which direction "up" and which is "down" at the neck of a contact binary like UT?

This slide from the Jan 2 press conference slides sheds some light on the present situation. (It doesn't give a vector but I assume things roll toward the neck.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JTN
post Jan 14 2019, 10:01 AM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 200
Joined: 20-November 05
From: Mare Desiderii
Member No.: 563



Tidbit from Alan Stern on Twitter yesterday: "We’re plaiinong an inage release— in 10 days!" (I make that about 23 Jan).

https://twitter.com/AlanStern/status/1084661266159931393
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_alex_k_*
post Jan 14 2019, 02:00 PM
Post #21





Guests






An animation about details. Quality of 4:22 LORRI image is lower, but still.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Alan Stern
post Jan 14 2019, 10:26 PM
Post #22


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 529
Joined: 19-February 05
Member No.: 173



QUOTE (JTN @ Jan 14 2019, 11:01 AM) *
Tidbit from Alan Stern on Twitter yesterday: "We’re plaiinong an inage release— in 10 days!" (I make that about 23 Jan).

https://twitter.com/AlanStern/status/1084661266159931393


Update: Now planning an image release for this week too.

Sorry for the typos above, was walking between flights in Doha; well, actually running between flights!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peikojose
post Jan 15 2019, 12:55 AM
Post #23


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 11-January 19
Member No.: 8528



QUOTE (Alan Stern @ Jan 14 2019, 06:26 PM) *
Update: Now planning an image release for this week too.

Sorry for the typos above, was walking between flights in Doha; well, actually running between flights!

Nice!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Moore
post Jan 15 2019, 02:51 AM
Post #24


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 156
Joined: 22-May 09
From: Ireland
Member No.: 4792



QUOTE (Alan Stern @ Jan 14 2019, 10:26 PM) *
Update: Now planning an image release for this week too.

Sorry for the typos above, was walking between flights in Doha; well, actually running between flights!


Interviewed Alan many years' back...a wonderful experience: walking then, running still today to inspire.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Jan 15 2019, 07:18 PM
Post #25


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



A slightly more elongated and less round shape of UT from a slightly different perspective ? https://twitter.com/hashtag/UltimaThuleFlyby?src=hash
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Jan 16 2019, 12:00 AM
Post #26


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



New movie from 500000 km to 28000 km: http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/News-Center/News-A...p?page=20190115
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Řyvind G
post Jan 16 2019, 01:04 AM
Post #27


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 19-July 15
Member No.: 7607



QUOTE (Marcin600 @ Jan 16 2019, 01:00 AM) *


From the release:
"...rotation of Ultima Thule in the seven hours between 20:00 UT (3 p.m. ET) on Dec. 31, 2018, and 05:01 UT (12:01 a.m.) on Jan. 1, 2019..."

Isn't that nine hours?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
john_s
post Jan 16 2019, 01:27 AM
Post #28


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 700
Joined: 3-December 04
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Member No.: 117



Oops! Sorry about that.

John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ian R
post Jan 16 2019, 07:19 AM
Post #29


Lord Of The Uranian Rings
***

Group: Members
Posts: 798
Joined: 18-July 05
From: Plymouth, UK
Member No.: 437



Wonderful images! Amazing how a slew of pictures at very moderate resolution can still be pretty insightful. I took one of the GIF animations and made an aligned and 'bouncy' version:

Attached Image


Looks as if the lobes are less spherical than they are hamburger shape!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ian R
post Jan 16 2019, 08:19 AM
Post #30


Lord Of The Uranian Rings
***

Group: Members
Posts: 798
Joined: 18-July 05
From: Plymouth, UK
Member No.: 437



My speculation is that the two lobes were never individual objects in the first place, and that the original fast rotation of MU69 -- back when it was newly formed and more prone to deformation -- caused a 'blob' to begin to separate from the main body due to centripetal forces, which in the end weren't enough for the two components to part completely.

Just a stab in the dark from a layperson!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Jan 16 2019, 08:38 AM
Post #31


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



QUOTE (Ian R @ Jan 16 2019, 09:19 AM) *
My speculation is that the two lobes were never individual objects in the first place, and that the original fast rotation of MU69 -- back when it was newly formed and more prone to deformation -- caused a 'blob' to begin to separate from the main body due to centripetal forces, which in the end weren't enough for the two components to part completely.

Just a stab in the dark from a layperson!



I think that this is one of many possibilities. In any case, things seem to be more complicated than they originally seemed
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Jan 16 2019, 09:03 AM
Post #32


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



For example, two bodies could be originally separate and flattened independently as a result of rotation. More data from New Horizons is needed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Jan 16 2019, 03:40 PM
Post #33


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1583
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



QUOTE (Marcin600 @ Jan 16 2019, 04:03 AM) *
For example, two bodies could be originally separate and flattened independently as a result of rotation.


Or accretion.

This is definitely real? If I focus on just the neck/isthmus then it does appear real, but I worry it's just an artifact.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pdalek
post Jan 17 2019, 05:33 AM
Post #34


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 4-March 14
Member No.: 7145



Ultima Thule looks like a snowman. A big snowman is a good way to think about formation and properties.

Comets have density about that of handmade snowballs. U-T is probably similar.
Calculating gravitation and centrifugal acceleration will show it is gravitationally bound over the entire surface and so was not formed by stretching a sphere.

The escape velocity is about that of a human thrown snowball. Fall velocities would be similar. At such velocity, a small snowball acreating under gravity will splat. For a large falling snowball, self gravitation will keep the ball in shape. Higher impact velocity would change things, but without large nearby planets to shift orbits, this is unlikely.

The compressive strength ordinary packed snow is sufficient to prevent a 19km and a 14km balls from merging to a much more compact space. It is easy to estimate the contact area.

Modelling the gravitational field shows local down is up to about 30 degrees from surface normal near the neck. This is about the angle of repose of lightly packed snow.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Jan 17 2019, 08:15 AM
Post #35


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



As Stevesilva supposes, the slightly flattened shape of Ultima (and Thule?) - if it is not a low resolution artifact - may be the result of the specificity of the accretion process itself - in one plane, a bit like an accretion disc (?)

I think the wonderful New Horizons team is already working on the interpretations.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
john_s
post Jan 17 2019, 12:00 PM
Post #36


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 700
Joined: 3-December 04
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Member No.: 117



QUOTE (Ian R @ Jan 16 2019, 12:19 AM) *
I took one of the GIF animations and made an aligned and 'bouncy' version:

Looks as if the lobes are less spherical than they are hamburger shape!


Hi Ian-

Thanks for that very revealing "de-rotated" animation. We on the science team had been planning to do the same thing, but you beat us to it. When I sent the team a link to your animation, it sparked quite an e-mail storm. UT continues to surprise!

Thanks again,
John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Jan 18 2019, 05:13 AM
Post #37


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2085
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



New post from Alan: http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/News-Center/PI-Per...tive_01_17_2019

In addition to data downlink from MU69, some distant observations of the unchosen flyby target in March, and some extra fuel for post 2020 maneuver to a more distant object.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roman Tkachenko
post Jan 18 2019, 09:28 AM
Post #38


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 80
Joined: 18-October 15
From: Russia
Member No.: 7822



I just played around with the sequence

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_HGXKO9kus


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_alex_k_*
post Jan 18 2019, 03:00 PM
Post #39





Guests






Looking for surface features. Strong Fourier-based processing performed, details are exaggerated if resolved properly.
05:01:47 (better res) vs 6 stacked 04:04

Focused on Ultima:
Attached Image


Focused on Thule:
Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ian R
post Jan 18 2019, 05:37 PM
Post #40


Lord Of The Uranian Rings
***

Group: Members
Posts: 798
Joined: 18-July 05
From: Plymouth, UK
Member No.: 437



QUOTE (john_s @ Jan 17 2019, 12:00 PM) *
Thanks for that very revealing "de-rotated" animation. We on the science team had been planning to do the same thing, but you beat us to it. When I sent the team a link to your animation, it sparked quite an e-mail storm. UT continues to surprise!

Thanks again,
John


Hi John,

That's pretty amazing! Thanks for the feedback: it's an honor to be tangentially involved with the team as new discoveries are being made about UT.

Ian.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Jan 18 2019, 07:54 PM
Post #41


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



What would happen when a body the size of one of UT's lobes was spun up if most of its mass was made up of a bunch of spheres a few km's in diameter instead of many smaller pieces? Would it end up hamburger shaped instead of football shaped as it shifted toward equilibrium?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kenny
post Jan 21 2019, 07:27 PM
Post #42


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 550
Joined: 1-May 06
From: Scotland (Ecosse, Escocia)
Member No.: 759



Analysis of Ultima Thule comparing its morphology with those of previously-imaged comets....

Forbes Magazine on UT January 21

...by astrophysicist author Ethan Siegel.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
john_s
post Jan 24 2019, 08:53 PM
Post #43


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 700
Joined: 3-December 04
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Member No.: 117



The current best image (a big improvement over the earlier ones, due to lower noise and higher phase angle) has just been posted:

http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/News-Center/News-A...p?page=20190124

John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jan 24 2019, 09:48 PM
Post #44


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10162
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Wow, that is a fantastic image - I have just played with it slightly here by brightening the terminator to show faint features a bit better. Just don't ask me to interpret it! - well, OK, maybe the broader depressions near the terminator of the large lobe look a bit like they are bounded by scalloped scarps retreating due to volatile loss.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Jan 24 2019, 10:28 PM
Post #45


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



An amazing object!!! And it is becoming more and more fascinating. There are really a lot of these small hollows on almost the entire surface. I can not wait for more detailed pictures. Sadly, we'll never see the reverse side...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gladstoner
post Jan 24 2019, 10:36 PM
Post #46


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 714
Joined: 3-January 08
Member No.: 3995



This faint white ring is... interesting:

Attached Image


So far, it doesn't seem to be associated with topographical features.

I wonder if some Kuiper belt objects will display relic binary-contact collars, i.e. talus rings left over after the binary components separated by some process (impacts, gravitational interactions). I suppose they could be thought of as 'kiss marks'.

Since this ring is near the rotational pole, and rather thin, it probably isn't an example.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Jan 24 2019, 10:51 PM
Post #47


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2085
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



Amazing new image! It really does look more like the smaller lobe has massive impact on it (like Phobos' Stickney crater) or Damodar on Mathilde.....
This confirms the closest approach images were captured successfully? Big sigh of relief!

Any idea where exactly the rotation pole is? I'm assuming near the centre of mass, on the right side of the circle Gladstoner added.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
abalone
post Jan 24 2019, 11:04 PM
Post #48


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 362
Joined: 12-June 05
From: Kiama, Australia
Member No.: 409



I get the impression that its possibly evidence of been put together like a hailstone accretion and the lines and lumpy appearance might be an artifact of that. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm.../94/Granizo.jpg Could also be the reason for the 'hamburger' shape if the individual lobe were slowly rotating during the accretion process before coming together.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hendric
post Jan 24 2019, 11:15 PM
Post #49


Director of Galilean Photography
***

Group: Members
Posts: 896
Joined: 15-July 04
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 93



Yeah that's my thought too, kinda like a kid with a snowball that keeps packing more snowballs onto it. Maybe the Thule lobe is just large enough to hold itself together, while the smaller objects just slumped.


--------------------
Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
--
"The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke
Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ian R
post Jan 24 2019, 11:32 PM
Post #50


Lord Of The Uranian Rings
***

Group: Members
Posts: 798
Joined: 18-July 05
From: Plymouth, UK
Member No.: 437



It's a jaw-dropping image: congratulations to the NH science team. blink.gif

Here's a colorized version, purely for aesthetic purposes:


Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Jan 24 2019, 11:38 PM
Post #51


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



QUOTE (hendric @ Jan 25 2019, 12:15 AM) *
Yeah that's my thought too, kinda like a kid with a snowball that keeps packing more snowballs onto it. Maybe the Thule lobe is just large enough to hold itself together, while the smaller objects just slumped.


a bit like a flattened hail https://ljkrakauer.com/LJK/00s/weirdhail.htm


covered with a tholin shell
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image

 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dudley
post Jan 25 2019, 12:20 AM
Post #52


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 68
Joined: 27-March 15
Member No.: 7426



One side of that dim ring on Ultima appears to be made up of two slightly separated arcs, on the side nearest Thule. The ring looks lopsided at first glance, but appears to have bilateral symmetry, on either side of a line running across it diagonally toward the dark cleft on one side of the 'neck' region.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post Jan 25 2019, 05:48 AM
Post #53


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 684
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (Ian R @ Jan 25 2019, 12:32 AM) *
It's a jaw-dropping image: congratulations to the NH science team. blink.gif

Here's a colorized version, purely for aesthetic purposes:


Attached Image


Very interesting how there's a scarp where the surface crust appears to end at the lower right,
and the highly defined craters are only on the area where there is no scarp.

There was a paper that calculated that the grooves on the Martian moon Phobos could be caused by low velocity impact with boulders that rolled along the surface.

Sorta looks like Thule and Ultima made contact around 5 o'clock, and rolled along ripping up the crust until it settled at 1 o'clock.


Soo, basically, it looks like a Bert the Turtle from 1950s civil defense films.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Jan 25 2019, 07:01 AM
Post #54


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1044
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



The news article comments on differences in the geologic character of the two lobes of Ultima Thule. Whether the suspected difference is compositional or textural this could imply the lobes developed separately. If so then when Ultima and Thule came together there would potentially have been a few scrapes, bounces and heat as linear and angular momentum was sorted out. In this respect the light ring Gladstoner refers to seems to fit the crater in the smaller lobe. Bit of a stretch but not beyond the bounds of possibility.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ian R
post Jan 25 2019, 11:23 AM
Post #55


Lord Of The Uranian Rings
***

Group: Members
Posts: 798
Joined: 18-July 05
From: Plymouth, UK
Member No.: 437



The two best views of UT thus far (courtesy of LORRI and MVIC):


Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Steve5304_*
post Jan 25 2019, 01:08 PM
Post #56





Guests






QUOTE (Ian R @ Jan 25 2019, 11:23 AM) *
The two best views of UT thus far (courtesy of LORRI and MVIC):


Attached Image



Man...that ring...what the blink.gif

The further out we get the stranger things are. It looks like a sad snowman! The media will jump all over this laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Jan 25 2019, 02:26 PM
Post #57


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1583
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



If we think back to the fact that they're more hamburgers than spheres that ring might be circumpolar (well, the pre-merger rotational pole) and Ultima might've looked like Saturn's moon Atlas or Pan before getting a remora.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gladstoner
post Jan 25 2019, 03:53 PM
Post #58


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 714
Joined: 3-January 08
Member No.: 3995



The sparse cratering is intriguing. So far, the bodies don’t seem to be crater-saturated as one would expect for small, primitive bodies. Either they were resurfaced, or we are seeing a barely altered primordial surface. I don’t know of any other body in the solar system where this is close to being the case. Of course, forthcoming images will provide more details.

Plus, the crater size distribution seems to be one large depression on Thule and a few pits near the limit of resolution. So far, there appears to be a dearth of intermediate sizes. It’ll be interesting to find out what this says — if anything— about object distribution in this part of the solar system, assuming these are impact craters.

Also, there seem to be a number of concave scarps that are outward facing. Could these be slumping that occurred on an earlier, rapidly-rotating Ultima?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Webscientist
post Jan 25 2019, 04:38 PM
Post #59


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 98
Joined: 30-November 05
From: Antibes, France
Member No.: 594



Very nice work!
Some "scientific artists" of the past had anticipated the shape of that new type of solar system object. Really remarkable! blink.gif

At first sight, I would bet that the density of Thule is higher than the density of the external blanket of Ultima since Ultima seems to have been more distorted by the relatively soft impact wheras Thule seems more uniform (or less distorted).

Can the gravitational interactions between the two parts in the rotation process engender landslides or resurfacing events erasing some craters?


QUOTE (Ian R @ Jan 25 2019, 12:32 AM) *
It's a jaw-dropping image: congratulations to the NH science team. blink.gif

Here's a colorized version, purely for aesthetic purposes:


Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Steve5304_*
post Jan 25 2019, 05:59 PM
Post #60





Guests









I would think that you just don't have that much out that far...it unlikely to be any sort of resurfacing...how would that even happen that far out on a dead object like this?? Accretion over millions of years??

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tty
post Jan 25 2019, 07:07 PM
Post #61


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 688
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



It seems to me that an impact as large as the one on Thule would create enough momentum to separate the lobes, at least temporarily. Could the "ring" be a previous "attachment point"?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Jan 25 2019, 07:30 PM
Post #62


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



Small round pits are not necessarily impact craters. They are best seen at the terminator, but they seem to cover large surfaces - they appear as white dots. They can be "internal" and not "external" origin. They have similar size and lack of size distribution typical of craters. (I'm not talking about a big hole at Thule - it can be a crater, but it does not have to be!)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rittmann
post Jan 25 2019, 08:14 PM
Post #63


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 16-July 15
Member No.: 7599



Some speculation based on the last image two-frame rotating image...

In the rotational image it seems as if there was not one, but two rings of bright material: the central one, and another one to the lower left side of the image. If this is a remnant of an ancient contact point between Ultima and Thule, I speculate that one of them was an earlier contact point and a later impact made Thule roll over Ultima creating the second ring. The exact place where the rolling happened could be the bright patch of material that is where both possible rings find each other. Since the lower left area apparently has two small craters / sinkholes, it would be the most ancient area.

In Thule there appears to be two different types of terrain. Right on the top we see some possible cratering, as well as on the right side of the depression / crater. But the central left side of the depression / crater appears smooth to a certain degree. This may be due to lightning conditions, but I think that an impact has enough kinetic energy as to melt partially the material in Thule and make it flow over older terrain. With such a low gravity, most of the splash would be lost but the melting could flow that way. The "melting" also seems to hide a bright line, that could be the ancient contact point between Ultima and Thule: it appears to be an arc of roughly the same size of the other rings in the current contact area and in Ultima. If so, stretching the hypothesis the V in Thule could correspond to the marking of the rolling: in Ultima we see two well-defined arcs touching, and the V in Thule would be the remnant of one of the sides of the touching arc. Also, the crater / depression has no clean border which could be explained by the melting hypothesis.

So the story of these bodies, according to these speculations, would be:

1. Formation of both bodies and for some unknown mechanism they eventually enter in contact. Original contact point is the central circle on Ultima.

2. Some moderate impact causes Thule to roll over Ultima, possibly from a not strong contact equilibrium position. This creates a second neck, the lower-left circle that seems more visible in the rotation image.

3. A bigger impact creates the crater / depression seen in Thule, splitting the contact binary and causing both bodies to change rotation axis. Eventually both bodies came into contact again, in the position we see nowadays. Impact creates enough cynetic energy as to partially melt the surface of the bodies, causing the flows we see and partially erasing the original contact rings in Thule, as well as melting the crater borders. Ejecta orbits the plane of the impact until collisioning with both bodies, littering the craters we see near the border of both bodies. Since ejecta impactors are small, melting is on a smaller scale and don't cause flows.

Against these hypothesis: there appears to be some sort of flow on Ultima, or at least similarities in the surface features, yet the rings are dimmed but not erased. This could mean that the flow is not such, but the rain of fine debris from the impact. The original impactor would then be the source of most impact craters we see in the border: we can see in the high-resolution image at least a couple of craters of a similar size in the (2) ancient neck, so at least from current data it seems that craters have a clear distribution over both surfaces.

As for the mechanism of making both bodies end up contacting, the only idea that comes into my mind is that since both bodies are fairly irregular in shape, the micro-gravity field should be far from homogeneous causing losses over time as mutual rotations cause shifts in the gravity field, so orbit would degrade over time. But I have no expertise in orbital mechanics, so I don't know if I just said something stupid here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wildespace
post Jan 26 2019, 11:24 AM
Post #64


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 15-January 13
Member No.: 6842



Exciting!

Here's a version with some colours plugged in from a reprocessed colour image:

Attached Image




--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tty
post Jan 26 2019, 12:29 PM
Post #65


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 688
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



As for the mechanism bringing the bodies back together after a major impact, tidal dissipation immediately comes to mind. If the impact energy was enough to make one body at least partially plastic the dissipation would be greatly increased.

However explicitly calculating the effect on two highly irregular (and possibly inhomogenous) rotating bodies in probably very eccentric orbits would be quite challenging. Qualitatively I would guess that the tidal effects would first slow down rotation of both bodies until they became tidally locked, and probably simultaneously decrease eccentricity of the orbits. Once tidal rotational lock is reached any further dissipation would very slowly bring the bodies together.

Of course they could also have re-collided physically long before this. It all depends on the orbits.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spock1108
post Jan 26 2019, 04:13 PM
Post #66


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 13-November 15
Member No.: 7840



An attempt to add colors ...

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roman Tkachenko
post Jan 26 2019, 06:25 PM
Post #67


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 80
Joined: 18-October 15
From: Russia
Member No.: 7822



My attempt to improve the image.
Not the best way to do such things when you have no raw image, but anyway rolleyes.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ronatu
post Jan 26 2019, 06:43 PM
Post #68


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 32
Joined: 17-April 05
Member No.: 235



Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jasedm
post Jan 26 2019, 07:23 PM
Post #69


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 655
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



Following on from discussions about the surface geology, some of the shapes seem to be somewhat reminiscent of 'patterned ground' - polygonal structures caused by freeze/thaw and subsequent differentiation of surface material. I'm not sure if UT has enough of an eccentric orbit to cause these processes, but it seems a possibility.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PhilipTerryGraha...
post Jan 26 2019, 10:03 PM
Post #70


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 12-December 16
Member No.: 8089



I'm assuming the raw MVIC data downlinked thus far hasn't been thrown up onto the PDS or any other place just yet?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spock1108
post Jan 27 2019, 11:32 AM
Post #71


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 13-November 15
Member No.: 7840



It reminds me of someone ...

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Jan 27 2019, 05:17 PM
Post #72


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2517
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (PhilipTerryGraham @ Jan 26 2019, 02:03 PM) *
I'm assuming the raw MVIC data downlinked thus far hasn't been thrown up onto the PDS...

One does not simply "throw stuff" onto the PDS. https://pds-smallbodies.astro.umd.edu/data_...AP-01_R0_C0.pdf doesn't describe the schedule for the extended mission but Table 3 says the first delivery of Pluto encounter data took about 9 months from encounter.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Jan 28 2019, 07:41 PM
Post #73


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2530
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



re: resurfacing, we're certainly looking at a world where geology doesn't apply in the usual sense, but there are still mechanisms at this scale that can blank the surface:

• The shaking that occurs with a straight-on impact could cause material to flow down slopes.
• An impact could shower the surface with material causing a new surface to overlie the old one.
• Porous portions of the body could collapse inward to a new configuration at higher density.
• Electrostatic accumulation of fine-grained material burying the old surface.

More?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gladstoner
post Jan 28 2019, 09:12 PM
Post #74


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 714
Joined: 3-January 08
Member No.: 3995



QUOTE (JRehling @ Jan 28 2019, 01:41 PM) *
• Porous portions of the body could collapse inward to a new configuration at higher density.


The feature marked here does resemble a line of collapse pits along a fracture:

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rittmann
post Jan 29 2019, 05:11 AM
Post #75


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 16-July 15
Member No.: 7599



Another mechanism comes to my mind for the white lines we see. If these bodies are made of lesser balls of aggregated material, which originally may have clumped before being added to Última and Thule, they would have boundaries. Any energetic impact that could have partially melted the surrounding material of the impact area could cause a melting, which would naturally flow through these discrete boundaries filling them up and causing contrast of materials.

As a result, even if there was a full melting of the clump surface, boundary would still differentiate. And the big circle in Última seems exactly that: melted surface which slightly seems a done with a surrounding ring, but the flowing material escapes this boundary - this seems apparent on the right side.

Against this, is where would be the impact crater causing any such melting. Thule has a crater, but Ultima seems devoid of any such originator in the area.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Jan 29 2019, 10:05 AM
Post #76


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (Rittmann @ Jan 29 2019, 06:11 AM) *
If these bodies are made of lesser balls of aggregated material, which originally may have clumped before being added to Última and Thule, they would have boundaries.


I have one observation I haven't seen mentioned explicitly here. The constituent lumps of the larger lobe Ultima all seem to be about the same size, causing it to resemble a bag of oranges. I have absolutely no suggestions as to why that might be.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Jan 29 2019, 10:44 PM
Post #77


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



During Rosetta's 67/P mission, there have been lots of speculations about cometesimals as building blocks. This paper appears to contain some of the according discussion, especially subsection 4.3 about their hierarchical agglomeration.
The paper is referencing a paper about simulations of this mechanism. Here an excerpt of the abstract:
QUOTE
The size distribution of cometesimals growing by drag-induced collisions develops a narrow peak in the range tens to hundreds of meters.

So, there seem to exist size-dependent agglomeration mechanisms with prefered grain sizes. Above some size, gravity between cometesimals should come into relevant play, and we are getting into a rubble pile model.

This is just some clue, where to start with.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fran Ontanaya
post Jan 30 2019, 01:34 PM
Post #78


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 22-September 08
From: Spain
Member No.: 4350



Ultima resembles a bit Atlas too, which would imply it accreted within a ring of particles

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Jan 30 2019, 10:22 PM
Post #79


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



This model assumes gravitational instabilities formed 1 km planeteseimals which them accreted leftover cm-sized pebbles. It includes a period when similar sized planetesimals accrete each other:

Forming the Cold Classical Kuiper Belt in a Light Disk
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818..175S

There are also some LPSC abstracts discussing formation mchanisms:
https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2019/pdf/2809.pdf
https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2019/pdf/3044.pdf
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post Feb 1 2019, 08:00 AM
Post #80


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 684
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (Steve5304 @ Jan 25 2019, 05:59 PM) *
I would think that you just don't have that much out that far...it unlikely to be any sort of resurfacing...how would that even happen that far out on a dead object like this?? Accretion over millions of years??


IIRC, there is a "Stria" paper The Formation of Striae within Cometary Dust Tails by a Sublimation Driven YORP like Effect
about cryo-ice sublimation torques, which estimated that CO could still exert some pressure out to 40-50AU.

Also, "think fluffy", like aerogels (solid smoke), shuttle tiles, and pink fiberglass insulation, these objects should be exceedingly bad at heat conduction, and a large internal surface area should suppress convection by any internal gasses.

I'm really curious about the results from the "radar ping" experiments, billions of years with a surface dominated by sublimation, I'll guess there may be some ice pinnacles or other "twists" that are responsible for the appearance at this resolution.
Formation of metre-scale bladed roughness on Europa’s surface by ablation of ice
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roman Tkachenko
post Feb 1 2019, 11:44 AM
Post #81


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 80
Joined: 18-October 15
From: Russia
Member No.: 7822



Interpolated animation derived from CA04 LORRI and CA06 MVIC frames


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post Feb 1 2019, 03:49 PM
Post #82


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 684
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (ngunn @ Jan 29 2019, 11:05 AM) *
I have one observation I haven't seen mentioned explicitly here. The constituent lumps of the larger lobe Ultima all seem to be about the same size, causing it to resemble a bag of oranges. I have absolutely no suggestions as to why that might be.


A binary KBO goes splat. It generates fragments and a gravitationally bound exosphere.
Disruption leaves 2 primaries and 6 fragments.
Thanks to the laws of orbital mechanics, all 6 fragments accrete onto one fragment, creating "the hamburger", and kicking the "the meatball" into a more eccentric orbit.
Tides and the angular momentum transfer via the exosphere lock meatball and hamburger into a spiraling synchronous orbit, tidal heating cause the crater on the meatball and the scarps on the hamburger which replenish the exosphere. They end up tidally locked, and eventually dock.

-edit- Or, you've got a situation with "snow white and the 7 dwarfs" where seven small chunks accrete and capture one larger chunk.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Feb 5 2019, 05:18 PM
Post #83


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



J. I. Katz, Ultima Thule (486958; 2014 MU69): Necklace, Composition, Rotation, Formation

QUOTE
Flyby images of Ultima Thule (486958; 2014 MU69) show a comparatively bright ``necklace'' between its two lobes, in contrast to its generally low albedo. The necklace is found in the most shaded, and therefore coolest, part of its surface. It may be clean, high albedo, ``hoarfrost'' condensed from vapor evaporated from the low albedo dirty ice elsewhere. Ammonia, the likely major constituent of Ultima Thule, has the necessary vapor pressure. The rotation period of 15±1h is at least twice its breakup period, indicating either that its formation was not limited by angular momentum or that half its angular momentum was lost after formation, perhaps to surrounding gas in the proto-Solar System. The lobes of Ultima Thule must have spherized under conditions different than those encountered by its present, post-contact, configuration.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AJAW
post Feb 5 2019, 07:56 PM
Post #84


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 17-July 15
Member No.: 7604



Will our estimate of the rotation rate ever become good enough to look back at the occultation results from last year and work out exactly how many rotations have happened since?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Feb 8 2019, 07:30 PM
Post #85


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



New Horizons' Evocative Farewell Glance at Ultima Thule
Images Confirm the Kuiper Belt Object's Highly Unusual, Flatter Shape

http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/News-Center/News-A...p?page=20190208

Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsbug
post Feb 8 2019, 09:00 PM
Post #86


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 401
Joined: 5-January 07
From: Manchester England
Member No.: 1563



I usually read with fascination but don't contribute for fear of denting the signal to noise ratio. However, it seems worth noting that my very un-expert brain immediately drew a connection between the weird shape of Ultima Thule and the weird shape of Omuamua. A flat, sail like, shape has been put forwards as an explanation for Omuamua's light curve I believe, and now it seems we have proof that nature can indeed craft such a flattened shape. Is it rediculous to suggest that the interstellar object could have formed in the same region of it's original solar system that Ultima Thule occupies in ours, and the two formed along approximately parallel lines under similar forces - acting in a bizarrely
pro pancake shape fashion?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Feb 8 2019, 09:07 PM
Post #87


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2085
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



Absolutely bizarre! A bit like the tiny moons of Saturn... but no rings anywhere nearby.

At the very least, this is good confirmation of two separate bodies being formed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gladstoner
post Feb 8 2019, 11:08 PM
Post #88


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 714
Joined: 3-January 08
Member No.: 3995



A little bit of Ultima-shine is visible on Thule:

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jccwrt
post Feb 9 2019, 03:43 AM
Post #89


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 306
Joined: 4-October 14
Member No.: 7273



I realigned the MU69 departure movie on MU69 itself to make an occultation fence. It looks like the small lobe is relatively well-constrained by stellar occultations. The larger lobe is a little more difficult to pin down, with fewer stars along the occulation path.
Attached Image


Here's some chords drawn in that help show the shape of the unlit side:
Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
monty python
post Feb 9 2019, 07:36 AM
Post #90


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 184
Joined: 2-March 06
Member No.: 692



Bravo for the occultation fence photo. The movie of it was too hard to follow for me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post Feb 9 2019, 11:39 PM
Post #91


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 684
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (JRehling @ Jan 28 2019, 08:41 PM) *
re: resurfacing, we're certainly looking at a world where geology doesn't apply in the usual sense, but there are still mechanisms at this scale that can blank the surface:

• The shaking that occurs with a straight-on impact could cause material to flow down slopes.
• An impact could shower the surface with material causing a new surface to overlie the old one.
• Porous portions of the body could collapse inward to a new configuration at higher density.
• Electrostatic accumulation of fine-grained material burying the old surface.

More?

Cohesion
• Tholin ("Sagan's star tar") surface weathering cementing sun-facing surfaces into a crust WITH sun-facing surface darkening over a wide spectral range.

ReDistribution
• YORP (natural photon drive) effects spinning the lobes up/down over time, depending on their current orientation and frost coverage/albedo patterns.
•sYORP (natural photon+cryovolatile gas drive) effects spinning the lobes up/down depending on their current orientation and frost coverge/albedo patterns.

Observation-
The patterns on the surface of Ultima Thule resembles the heat/flow patterns you get on a breakfast pancake-
a thin surface layer breaking and creeping as the interior slumps and spreads out.
Let's assume UT consists of unconsolidated material high in volatiles.
Apply heat (sunlight/hot pan) to form a crust/tholins, and you find that the bulk material spreads out (YORP, sYORP, heat driven sublimation to the limb) into a thin disk.

Hypothesis-
Tholin formation causes "browning" which forms a skin,then
-A YORP/sYORP spin or -B ammonia/volatile sublimation
push material towards the edge/shadowed limb of the dark side. This mass transfer to the edges results in a "pancake" shape where a tough tholin skin develops on two sides and sublimating material "squishes" out along the perimeter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Feb 10 2019, 07:49 AM
Post #92


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



QUOTE (HSchirmer @ Feb 10 2019, 12:39 AM) *
-A YORP/sYORP spin


MU69 is far from the Sun and large(ish). wouldn't YORP be negligible on such a body?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post Feb 10 2019, 03:54 PM
Post #93


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 684
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (Paolo @ Feb 10 2019, 07:49 AM) *
MU69 is far from the Sun and large(ish). wouldn't YORP be negligible on such a body?


Normally yes.
But, like raindrops wearing down a mountain range seems negligible, over geologic or astronomical timeframes it should add up.

A recent paper mentions ammonia sublimation and deposition as a resurfacing possibility, Ultima Thule (486958; 2014 MU69): Necklace, Composition, Rotation, Formation https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.00997 so if there is enough heat from photos to drive sublimation, there should be enough photons for YORP or sYORP.

And a hamburger shaped dark-red body is a pretty good candidate for YORP/sYORP effects, especially if there is a white frosty coating on one side.

So, it seems like we are looking at a pair of spheroids, resembling a "bag of oranges" or "bag of grapes".




Wait, I finally read the extended caption, -the blue dotted lines are the range of uncertainty!?!

"The dashed blue lines span the uncertainty in that hemisphere, which shows that Ultima Thule could be either flatter than, or not as flat as, depicted in this figure. "

So, these could be incredibly flattened!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dudley
post Feb 11 2019, 04:51 PM
Post #94


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 68
Joined: 27-March 15
Member No.: 7426



Could it be that the problems of dissipating momentum, and the odd, flattened shapes of Ultima and Thule could be related? Could the momentum have been dissipated when the two objects encountered each other in space, in the process of pulling each other into the flattened shapes we observe today?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Feb 11 2019, 06:10 PM
Post #95


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1583
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



My notes on the press conference remind me that it was predicted that CA06 would be the potentially highest resolution images. These "crescent" images are CA07 and I see CA01 and CA04 in the raw images page. Still more coming!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post Feb 11 2019, 07:36 PM
Post #96


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 684
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (dudley @ Feb 11 2019, 05:51 PM) *
Could it be that the problems of dissipating momentum, and the odd, flattened shapes of Ultima and Thule could be related? Could the momentum have been dissipated when the two objects encountered each other in space, in the process of pulling each other into the flattened shapes we observe today?


There are a few ideas similar to that- usually dealing with a mostly vaporized rocky planet loses energy to reform a rocky planet or binary; of course, when you think of it, this is fundamentally the same process as gas and ice losing energy to form a KBO.

The structure of terrestrial bodies: Impact heating, corotation limits, and synestias
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi...02/2016JE005239

The Origin of the Moon Within a Terrestrial Synestia
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi...02/2017JE005333
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Feb 22 2019, 01:49 AM
Post #97


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



Alan Stern tweeted, new pics tomorrow smile.gif.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Feb 22 2019, 07:17 PM
Post #98


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



Sharpest view of Ultima Thule: http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/News-Center/News-A...p?page=20190222


"...The most detailed images of Ultima Thule -- obtained just minutes before the spacecraft's closest approach at 12:33 a.m. EST on Jan. 1 -- have a resolution of about 110 feet (33 meters) per pixel..."

"... The higher resolution brings out a many surface features that weren't readily apparent in earlier images. Among them are several bright, enigmatic, roughly circular patches of terrain. In addition, many small, dark pits near the terminator (the boundary between the sunlit and dark sides of the body) are better resolved. "Whether these features are craters produced by impactors, sublimation pits, collapse pits, or something entirely different, is being debated in our science team," said John Spencer, deputy project scientist from SwRI."
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peikojose
post Feb 22 2019, 07:46 PM
Post #99


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 11-January 19
Member No.: 8528



Am I the only one that thinks that NH missed MU69 at the closest distance ? sad.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Feb 22 2019, 07:53 PM
Post #100


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2085
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



Amazing new views!


QUOTE (peikojose @ Feb 22 2019, 02:46 PM) *
Am I the only one that thinks that NH missed MU69 at the closest distance ? sad.gif


As Alan, said, these were the 'stretch goal' images, just a few minutes before closest approach. I don't think there will be much higher detail than this to come. Will there?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

11 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th May 2024 - 11:08 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.