MARDI microphone, maybe possibly it'll be turned on? |
MARDI microphone, maybe possibly it'll be turned on? |
Sep 18 2008, 03:52 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Leonard David reports that "the Phoenix lander team is going forward with turning on the spacecraft’s microphone."
I'm working on finding out more details. (For instance, I want to know if this also means they'll get to use the camera itself, maybe get a different perspective on Holy Cow, if the camera's pointing the right way.) In the meantime, enjoy hearing what Bill Nye and others would sound like on Mars before they asphyxiated. Yay! Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 03:56 PM
Post
#2
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
That's fantastic news! Being able to play kids the sound of the wind blowing on Mars would be brilliant! As you so eloquently put it, "Yay!"
Having said that... and without wanting to blow on anyone's chips here ... is this a sign that the Phoenix team is maybe sensing that the sand is really rushing through the hourglass now, and the time has come to start trying cool and unusual things..? -------------------- |
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 04:24 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
is this a sign that the Phoenix team is maybe sensing that the sand is really rushing through the hourglass now, and the time has come to start trying cool and unusual things..? It's probably the realization that at this point, turning MARDI on can't jeopardize the success of the mission anymore so they might as well do it. I don't see it as running against the clock. I'm glad they decided to turn it on, was hoping it would happen sometime during the extended mission. -------------------- |
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 05:03 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4247 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
I wonder if it will be sensitive enough to hear wind directly? Maybe some cavity somewhere on Phoenix will resonate in the wind and make a whistle or hum? Maybe the sound of the solar arrays flapping in the wind would be easier to hear, if it could carry directly through the body of Phoenix?
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 05:18 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
It's hard to know what, if anything, it'll hear; it was intended to listen to descent noises (whoosh and all that), so is probably pretty insensitive to the level of sound that currently prevails at the landing site -- but we'll see. We also have to see if it still works or not. So -- hope, but don't expect, to hear anything!
--Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 05:22 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
It would be great if they could acquire audio during soil sampling and ice scraping.
-------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 05:27 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
The motors in the robotic arm should produce a buzzing sound when operated, right?
-------------------- |
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 10:21 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
OK, here's a challenge for someone(s) with a facility for 3D visualization. The question is, what would MARDI be looking at if it took an image right now? More specifically, could it see any of the ice patches in Holy Cow? Attached is an image of the underside of the lander, in which you can see MARDI (it's the thing covered with a blue cover, actually a glove, just like the glove the technician is wearing!) I've tried to puzzle it out but am afraid of errors and am hoping a couple of people here can try to figure it out independently. Also relevant: its FOV is 66 degrees.
--Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 10:39 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 3108 Joined: 21-December 05 From: Canberra, Australia Member No.: 615 |
Perhaps we'll hear this...
mardi_1stsound.mp3 ( 25.1K ) Number of downloads: 1094 Sorry...couldn't resist. |
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 11:01 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
OK - If Phoenix is like a clock...
Solar Panels are at 2.30 and 8.30 The arm is mounted at about 1.30 MARDI looks to be at about 7 - sort of behind where the elbow of the arm was when folded flat. http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/14819.gif http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/14845.jpg I would GUESS - the area marked green...possibly getting a corner of one bit of the exposed stuff - but with MARDI being pointing slight away from straight down, I'm not confident. |
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 11:47 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 808 Joined: 10-October 06 From: Maynard Mass USA Member No.: 1241 |
doug,
In the second image you posted above ( http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/14845.jpg) it appears the telltale 'cord' has the bend (or similar) that we have seen from the first Sol it was deployed.... cheers -------------------- CLA CLL
|
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 01:13 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 29 Joined: 12-February 04 Member No.: 29 |
OK - If Phoenix is like a clock... Solar Panels are at 2.30 and 8.30 The arm is mounted at about 1.30 MARDI looks to be at about 7 - sort of behind where the elbow of the arm was when folded flat. http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/14819.gif http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/14845.jpg I would GUESS - the area marked green...possibly getting a corner of one bit of the exposed stuff - but with MARDI being pointing slight away from straight down, I'm not confident. Doug - I had thought that MARDI was fixed-focus (probably at Infinity) - so anything a few feet away would be out-of-focus, no? |
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 01:15 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
You would think that, but actually it does pretty well at short distances. See the bottom of this blog entry.
--Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 01:22 AM
Post
#14
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 29 Joined: 12-February 04 Member No.: 29 |
You would think that, but actually it does pretty well at short distances. See the bottom of this blog entry. --Emily Thanks - I had missed that BLOG entry. Mardi has an excellent depth of field. |
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 03:33 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2517 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
MARDI looks to be at about 7 - sort of behind where the elbow of the arm was when folded flat. FWIW, MARDI is just about exactly behind the met mast as seen from the SSI, and it's pointed 22 degrees outward from nadir. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 03:59 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 150 Joined: 3-June 08 From: McLean, VA Member No.: 4177 |
If the camera's 22 degrees pointing out, and slightly away, to the west, from the nearest jet, then I don't think MARDI can see the HolyCow plume effect. I make the centerline of the camera about 18 inches from the nearest jet in the science deck plane (I think X/Y). The camera is below the deck some 5 inches, and that's about 3 feet (?) from the surface. A little trig tells me they'll miss it by half a foot, guessing the size of each "skating rink" to be maybe a foot and a half in diameter(??)
That's back of the envelope, so it's just a guess. |
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 04:09 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
-------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 07:11 AM
Post
#18
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Round up a bit. 66 deg FOV, 22 deg out-from-Nadir pointing.
That means 22 degrees of FOV inside of Nadir from the camera, and 44 degrees outside of Nadir. Assuming a height of, say, 100 cm... I make it 40cm of terrain inside a point directly under MARDI and 96 cm of terrain outside it ( Tan Theta = Opposite (the distance on the ground) over Adjacent ( the height of Mardi above the ground ) ) |
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 09:53 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2920 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
Now that we "know" where Mardi is, can we determine the mike position relative to the incoming (main) wind and weather it'll pick up the wind strait or be shadowed by Mardi itself?
-------------------- |
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 01:33 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2517 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
can we determine the mike position relative to the incoming (main) wind... The microphone is more or less omnidirectional, and pointed in the same direction as the optics. You can see it in photos of the instrument; for example http://www.msss.com/phoenix/mardi/illustra.../phx_mardi2.jpg (you probably knew this already.) I don't know where the prevailing wind is from. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 02:06 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Special Cookie Group: Members Posts: 2168 Joined: 6-April 05 From: Sintra | Portugal Member No.: 228 |
Now...wouldn't it be great to capture another DD sequence with a wooooosh as soundtrack?...
-------------------- "Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe |
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 04:37 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 150 Joined: 3-June 08 From: McLean, VA Member No.: 4177 |
Round up a bit. 66 deg FOV, 22 deg out-from-Nadir pointing. That means 22 degrees of FOV inside of Nadir from the camera, and 44 degrees outside of Nadir. I think your arithmetic is wrong. The centerline of the camera is moved out 22 degrees. So straight down you get 33 degrees inside and outside of nadir. When you move the centerline out, it's 33 - 22 degrees inside of nadir. |
|
|
Guest_jumpjack_* |
Oct 2 2008, 07:12 AM
Post
#23
|
Guests |
It would be really cool to hear Phoenix digging Mars soli!
I stay tuned for news... Pleas keep us informed! |
|
|
Oct 2 2008, 01:45 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
The microphone is more or less omnidirectional, and pointed in the same direction as the optics. You can see it in photos of the instrument; for example http://www.msss.com/phoenix/mardi/illustra.../phx_mardi2.jpg (you probably knew this already.) Glad to see the Swiss Military were part of the MARDI team. -------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
Oct 3 2008, 12:35 AM
Post
#25
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1276 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
When can we expect science return?
|
|
|
Oct 4 2008, 04:36 AM
Post
#26
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
There was a small comment about when the microphone might be turned on in this news release.
QUOTE The Phoenix mission, originally planned for three months on Mars, now is in its fifth month. However, it faces a decline in solar energy that is expected to curtail and then end the lander's activities before the end of the year. Before power ceases, the Phoenix team will attempt to activate a microphone on the lander to possibly capture sounds on Mars. It sounds as if this experiment has a rather low priority. Is that because the event might trigger a fault? -------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
Oct 4 2008, 05:06 PM
Post
#27
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
There was a small comment about when the microphone might be turned on... Could they be planning to turn the microphone on only after there is insufficient power for digging? I was hoping to hear the sounds of Phoenix scrapping the surface of Mars. I suppose the next most interesting sound would be the solar panels creaking in the wind. |
|
|
Oct 5 2008, 02:21 AM
Post
#28
|
|
Martian Photographer Group: Members Posts: 352 Joined: 3-March 05 Member No.: 183 |
SSI and MECA-OM are noisy.
I don't think the microphone is being deliberately delayed. It is just not the highest priority thing to work on--using equipment in a "new" way after months of thermal cycles is something that needs to be approached with care. There is special concern during RA use. That's not to say it won't happen, but I'd be surprised if it happened first. |
|
|
Oct 9 2008, 12:47 AM
Post
#29
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2517 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
Does anyone know where the SSI exposure times might be tabulated? I need them to compute some exposure times for another instrument on the surface that may be operated soon
-------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Oct 9 2008, 01:00 AM
Post
#30
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 29-January 06 Member No.: 667 |
Does anyone know where the SSI exposure times might be tabulated? Like this? QUOTE Integration time 0-335 s in steps of 5.12 ms From Texas A&M University Surface Stereo Imager Vital Statistics From Texas A&M University Phoenix Surface Stereo Imager (SSI) |
|
|
Oct 9 2008, 02:33 AM
Post
#31
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2517 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
Like this? No, like what exposure time a specific image was taken with. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Oct 9 2008, 02:37 AM
Post
#32
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Exposure information can be found in the header for all the JPEG images. Attached is a .csv file (zipped) with the metadata from all the JPEGs available to date, stripped from the headers using Midnight Mars Browser.
--Emily
Attached File(s)
-------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Oct 9 2008, 02:46 AM
Post
#33
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2517 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
Exposure information can be found in the header for all the JPEG images. Thanks for the CSV file! Apparently very few extent JPEG viewers can read the EXIF tags for some reason. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Oct 9 2008, 03:14 AM
Post
#34
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Hmm. If I want to see a header, usually I just open the JPEG file in a text editor. --Emily
-------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Oct 9 2008, 09:08 AM
Post
#35
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 57 Joined: 6-September 07 From: Netherlands Member No.: 3683 |
Apparently very few extent JPEG viewers can read the EXIF tags for some reason. Irfanview works a treat. Just hit the 'image information' button or press 'i' and hit hit the 'comment' button or press 'c'. -------------------- Error: Life.sys corrupted
( R )eflect, ( R )epend, or ( R )eboot? |
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 02:33 PM
Post
#36
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
QUOTE "Hello...hello...(tap, tap, tap)...is this thing on? I just flew here all the way from Earth, boy are my solar panels tired! (pause for laughter) It's great to be here on the martian arctic plain...Do we have any martians out there tonight?...." But seriously, when is the microphone going to be activated? The recordings of Martian sounds would make a dramatic backdrop for every image of Mars ever captured. I'd hate to have the only sound sent to Earth be a 5-second clip of a solar panel snapping off from frost. [/vent] -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 04:19 PM
Post
#37
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2517 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
The recordings of Martian sounds would make a dramatic backdrop for every image of Mars ever captured. Let me try to lower your expectations. The audio is only digitized at 8 KHz (telephone quality at best), so even if it does work, IMHO it's not going to "make a dramatic backdrop" to anything. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 04:27 PM
Post
#38
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Please say it's not 8 bits/sample!
-------------------- |
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 05:16 PM
Post
#39
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
It's not 8 bits/sample
(you said please) If it's roughly the same as the '98 one, the ADC is 12bit. Prepare to be unamazed by the quality. http://www.planetary.org/programs/projects...microphone.html |
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 05:39 PM
Post
#40
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
I am indeed unamazed, but at least the sample depth is 12 bit. 8 bits is pretty much useless and very noisy for any appreciable dynamic range.
-------------------- |
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 05:56 PM
Post
#41
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2517 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
If it's roughly the same as the '98 one, the ADC is 12bit. It's got nothing in common with the Planetary Society microphone, but it's not 8 bits. "DSP561xx processors are noteworthy because they include a sigma-delta codec on-chip. The sigma-delta codec provides linear, analog I/O with 16-bit resolution over a bandwidth of approximately 4 kHz. Motorola states that the codec has a signal to noise-plus-distortion ratio of greater than 60 dB. " As always with ADCs, though, caveat emptor about how many of the stated bits are actually significant... QUOTE Prepare to be unamazed by the quality. Indeed. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 06:31 PM
Post
#42
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4247 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
Well, I wouldn't say that we exactly need high-fidelity surround-sound here! Do we expect much Martian sound above 8 kHz? Obviously higher signal-to-noise improves our chances of hearing anything at all, but I for one would be thrilled to hear even a sub-telephone-quality recording of the creaking of the solar panels flexing in the wind.
|
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 07:20 PM
Post
#43
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 09:35 PM
Post
#44
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 6-August 08 From: Augusta, Maine Member No.: 4305 |
|
|
|
Oct 21 2008, 04:04 PM
Post
#45
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4247 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
From the BBC:
QUOTE We'll start slowly, just turn it on and make sure it records sound, and we'll try and make some noise to make sure it's working. We'll try scraping ice with our robotic arm blade and we can bang a few pots or something. Then we'll listen just for the Mars sounds by themselves.
|
|
|
Oct 21 2008, 05:22 PM
Post
#46
|
|
Forum Contributor Group: Members Posts: 1372 Joined: 8-February 04 From: North East Florida, USA. Member No.: 11 |
Bang a few pots....I like it.
|
|
|
Guest_Enceladus75_* |
Oct 23 2008, 01:05 AM
Post
#47
|
Guests |
I really hope that they get the microphone up and running before Phoenix kicks the bucket. Even just a few minutes of hearing the whisper of the Martian winds would be pretty cool.
|
|
|
Oct 26 2008, 05:49 AM
Post
#48
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
From the BBC: Thanks, fredk. I enjoyed that article. This lander's mission was really quite complicated, was it not? Since Phoenix is not a rover, it was interesting to see how the team assigned priorities. Organics, isotopes, ions, and whatever else they hoped to find, this has been a really fascinating planetary adventure. I want to see another one. Hearing something will be fun, but it's not the highest priority on my agenda. I am fully prepared to begin banging pots at any time, if that is required. -------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
Oct 31 2008, 08:00 PM
Post
#49
|
|
Interplanetary Dumpster Diver Group: Admin Posts: 4404 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
Does anyone know if they ever got a chance to use the microphone? Also, is it still being considered (although banging with the arm is obviously out of the question?). It seems that when they are back up and running, while the most obvious source of noise is gone, it might be worth giving it a go now (in other words, they don't have nearly as much to lose considering so many of the instruments are out of operation).
-------------------- |
|
|
Oct 31 2008, 10:28 PM
Post
#50
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 29-January 06 Member No.: 667 |
Does anyone know if they ever got a chance to use the microphone? The Twitter feed (October 29) gave an indication or two that it might be tried before too long, but then the storm hit. QUOTE The mic may still be turned on. But, it was never intended for use on this mission & it never had a heater- so it may be a longshot If they had done it I think it would have been reported on Twitter or a news release. |
|
|
Nov 5 2008, 11:46 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 29-January 06 Member No.: 667 |
This is somewhat old news -- at least 24 hours old -- but I just saw this topic and thought it should be reported here:
Planetary Society Weblog: Phoenix update: Not dead yet [...] QUOTE Phoenix update: Not dead yet; still in "Lazarus mode;" one attempt at microphone use did not work
[...] They attempted to use the MARDI camera, including its microphone, somewhere around sol 146 (give or take a couple sols). It did not respond. But Barry thought that perhaps they hadn't allowed sufficient time for the instrument to warm up before commanding it to take data. Barry said he has "become a true believer in trying to get the microphone on" ever since Veronica McGregor passed him a message that had been received on the Phoenix Twitter feed from a blind man who pointed out that he never had a chance to see the pictures from Mars; sound would allow him, and others like him, to experience a foreign planet for the first time. Barry said he has instructed the team to include an attempt to use the microphone somewhere in the terminal science mode sequence, but he wasn't sure where it fell. [...] |
|
|
Nov 5 2008, 11:53 PM
Post
#52
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1229 Joined: 24-December 05 From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones. Member No.: 618 |
The things we take for granted...
-------------------- My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th May 2024 - 08:21 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |