IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

40 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Mercury Flyby 1
SFJCody
post Jan 12 2008, 09:18 AM
Post #106


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



A third image is up:

http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/scienc...MG.DLS.fits.jpg
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 12 2008, 11:31 AM
Post #107


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Here's an animation of the OPNAV frames so far:



EDIT: Edited to add the 4th frame.

This post has been edited by ugordan: Jan 13 2008, 12:03 PM


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SFJCody
post Jan 12 2008, 04:28 PM
Post #108


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



The images have been renamed. New links can be found at:

http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/sciencePhotos/pics/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
imipak
post Jan 12 2008, 07:20 PM
Post #109


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 646
Joined: 23-December 05
From: Forest of Dean
Member No.: 617



The caption for the latest image caught my eye.
QUOTE
"...this image has a resolution of about 44 kilometers/pixel (27 miles/pixel). MESSENGER will pass 200 kilometers (124 miles) above Mercury's surface..."


ie., the closest approach would appear five pixels from the limb (if it happened to be perfectly situated relative to the camera) in that image! Really brings home the incredible precision of the engineering needed to control a spacecraft.


--------------------
--
Viva software libre!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PDP8E
post Jan 12 2008, 09:58 PM
Post #110


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 808
Joined: 10-October 06
From: Maynard Mass USA
Member No.: 1241



Here is the latest Mercury image from Messenger that I lightly processed.
As a rule I really dont like working from JPEGs (wish I had the raw data!)

cheers!

Attached Image


--------------------
CLA CLL
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Jan 12 2008, 10:45 PM
Post #111


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Here is my latest on the newest image. These are not bad for jpegs.

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Jan 13 2008, 01:35 AM
Post #112


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



While we are waiting, I made a new stand-in red filter to make an approximate UV/Blue/Green color image (sort of Voyager-esque in that sense - Voyager had an orange filter, but often press release images were UV/Blue(orViolet)/Green). I have attached links not only to the large jpeg (which is heavily compressed), but also to the PNG file, which, be warned, is 7 megabytes.

At the very least, it kept regions which are brighter in UV from simply seeming desaturated like they did in the version I posted earlier.



JPEG Version

PNG Version - 7 MB


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jan 13 2008, 02:06 AM
Post #113


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Beautiful, Ted; thank you!!! smile.gif

Entirely unoriginal here, but can't help remarking on the fact that Mercury looks like the Moon from a distance, but not at closer scales. The large craters seem much shallower (gravitation differential? magma fill?), and the fresh ones (the punchbowls) often produce bright ejecta...very different. The lack of cratering in the wrinkled terrain is also notable.

I can hardly wait. Go MESSENGER!!!!


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jan 13 2008, 02:46 AM
Post #114


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



An attempt at identifying some of the craters in the latest opnav image:
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Jan 13 2008, 03:07 AM
Post #115


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2250
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



QUOTE (tedstryk @ Jan 13 2008, 01:35 AM) *
While we are waiting, I made a new stand-in red filter to make an approximate UV/Blue/Green color image (sort of Voyager-esque in that sense - Voyager had an orange filter, but often press release images were UV/Blue(orViolet)/Green). I have attached links not only to the large jpeg (which is heavily compressed), but also to the PNG file, which, be warned, is 7 megabytes.

Wow! This is by far the best global image of Mercury I have ever seen and should remain so for a few days at least wink.gif.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SFJCody
post Jan 13 2008, 11:40 AM
Post #116


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



Image 4 reveals *lots* more details!


http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/scienc...0108616141M.jpg


That image of Ted Stryk's makes me annoyed. Annoyed because Mercury has been represented by old b/w photomosiacs with prominent seams for decades, when that beautiful image was hiding in the data all along. That's what should have been in the textbooks!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 13 2008, 11:57 AM
Post #117


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



The 4th image (based on spacecraft clock, it was taken on January 12, 2008, 09:06 UTC, precisely one day after the last one) shows nice detail, indeed. Here's an enhancement to show more details on the sunlit limb, magnified 2x:

Attached Image


I've also added this most recent frame into the enhanced OPNAV animation in post #107.

There'll probably be only one more frame released before the science observations start some 30 hours before C/A. Extrapolating into the "future", this would be the (non-magnified) pixel size of Mercury on Jan 13, 09:06 UTC seen by the NAC camera: Solar System Simulator view. 70% larger than the latest one.

That image was presumably already taken and downlinked and MESSENGER should be into the color approach movie sequence right now.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jan 13 2008, 01:18 PM
Post #118


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



My own humble attempt to find some detail in the new image... you guys clearly have nothing to be worried about! laugh.gif

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Jan 13 2008, 02:03 PM
Post #119





Guests






Where did you get that 4th image from? I can't find it here -http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 13 2008, 02:09 PM
Post #120


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (Zvezdichko @ Jan 13 2008, 03:03 PM) *
Where did you get that 4th image from? I can't find it here -http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/

It's uploaded to the web server at http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/sciencePhotos/pics/ , but no caption was written yet.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

40 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 10:12 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.