IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

78 Pages V  « < 76 77 78  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Crossing the Dunes at Murray Buttes, Sites 54-, Sols 1353-, May 28 2016-
PaulH51
post Yesterday, 06:57 AM
Post #1156


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1081
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



R-MastCam 4 frame mosaic from 1638 that features the small outcrop where the rover crushed the small dark rock: Post Link
The mosaic shows us a number of small dark pebbles / rocks on top of the outcrop.
Possibly the same material? Image quality was reduced to meet the attachment limits.
Raw images: Link
Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Yesterday, 10:29 AM
Post #1157


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1772
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Navcam L view on Sol 1643.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Yesterday, 02:31 PM
Post #1158


Martian Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 7028
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Thanks, Jan - and here is your panorama in circular form. Quite a messy patchwork of sand and rock.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
charborob
post Yesterday, 08:20 PM
Post #1159


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 590
Joined: 21-September 07
From: Québec, Canada
Member No.: 3908



I haven't posted anything for a while, so here is the sol 1643 Lpancam view:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
atomoid
post Yesterday, 09:03 PM
Post #1160


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 647
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Member No.: 196



nice! and here's my eyestrain-inducing attempt at a wide baseline anaglyph of a small compatible portion of those sol1642 and sol1643 views.
i suppose the downlink of part1 of the 28x1 mosaic offset of Vera Rubin Ridge is on backburner, just thumbs for now.. i'd thought sol1642/1643 was to be the offset pair but i must be wrong about that..
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

78 Pages V  « < 76 77 78
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd March 2017 - 12:28 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.