China to the Moon - Chang'e program, Chinese unmanned lunar mission |
![]() ![]() |
China to the Moon - Chang'e program, Chinese unmanned lunar mission |
Mar 3 2009, 05:01 AM
Post
#121
|
||
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4514 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
A stretched out version - easier to try to locate it. But I don't recognize the area. This has north up, from the lighting direction, if it's taken on the last orbit.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
|
|
|
|
||
Mar 3 2009, 06:27 AM
Post
#122
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 232 Joined: 5-June 08 From: Udon Thani Member No.: 4185 |
According to moondaily.com China plans a (unmanned) moonlanding for 2013.
The article contains an image of a sample-return probe taking off from the moon which indeed looks a lot like a (Soviet) Y8E derived vehicle. If this is true, my earlier remark here that this landingsite might be selected for its option to fly a direct ascent trajectory back to earth seems to make sense, they might indeed be planning to attempt a sample-return mission with a moonlanding in the vicinity of the present crash-site. Regards, Geert. |
|
|
|
Aug 6 2009, 03:13 PM
Post
#123
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1146 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
-------------------- I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.
James Van Allen |
|
|
|
Sep 28 2009, 08:56 PM
Post
#124
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1146 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
This Aviation Week article http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/sto...china092809.xml is mostly about MSF, but it does say that Chang'e 2 will fly in October 2010.
"Improvements include a better camera with a resolution of 5 meters (16.4 ft.) at the surface, they say." -------------------- I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.
James Van Allen |
|
|
|
| Guest_Zvezdichko_* |
Nov 27 2009, 10:13 AM
Post
#125
|
|
Guests |
http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/news.shtml
Novosti-Kosmonavtiki confirms launch in October 2010 and it is also said that Chang'e 2 will be 100 kms closer to the lunar surface. It's also said that the instruments will be even more sophisticated and powerful, but I don't know about the resolution of the camera. Chang'e 2 will be based on a back-up spacecraft for Chang'e 1 already built. Initially it was supposed to be launched as-is, as a clone of Chang'e 1, but now it's confirmed it will carry more powerful instruments. Novosti-Kosmonavtiki also says the moon rover will be launched no later than 2013. The moon rover will study the local resources, particularly minerals. The rover will be a stepping stone to a human mission to the Moon, which has to occur no later than 2030. |
|
|
|
| Guest_Zvezdichko_* |
Dec 2 2009, 01:39 PM
Post
#126
|
|
Guests |
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Change_1...ration_999.html
A new article plus a thumbnail of the topographic map. Do you have any idea if we already have a bigger version somewhere? http://www.physorg.com/newman/gfx/news/hir...hange1hasbl.jpg |
|
|
|
Dec 3 2009, 01:50 AM
Post
#127
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 6474 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
100 km closer using the same spacecraft bus & upgraded instruments, eh? They don't seem too worried about thermal problems.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2009, 02:10 PM
Post
#128
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 966 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 |
Perhaps with the information gained from their first lunar mission, they're confident they'll be able to handle it. On the other hand, if they suddenly consider raising altitude for a better view, we'll know what's happening
-------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2009, 03:11 PM
Post
#129
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4514 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
LRO's at 50 km and it's not bothering them.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
|
|
|
|
Dec 4 2009, 01:45 AM
Post
#130
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 6474 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Surely. I was being kind of elliptical; it appears that they are quite confident in their basic design is what I meant.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
|
Dec 5 2009, 11:47 AM
Post
#131
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 57 Joined: 21-September 06 Member No.: 1172 |
Do you have any idea if we already have a bigger version somewhere? Yes, we have. See attachments below. First one is topographical map from Chang'e Laser Altimeter with North/South pole views presented. Second one is a kind of microwave map at 37 GHz. I can't translate the title, but I suppose it presents a microwave emissivity of the moon regolith. |
|
|
|
Dec 5 2009, 03:19 PM
Post
#132
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 21-December 06 Member No.: 1502 |
微波月亮 34Ghz 白天正面/背面
microwave moon 34Ghz Daytime Frontside/Backside |
|
|
|
Aug 25 2010, 10:16 PM
Post
#133
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4514 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
(checking in from vacation)
(like, who can stay away from UMSF even if a vacation is supposed to be happening?) So now I hear that Chang-e 2, the Moon orbiter due to launch in October this year, will be carrying a small lunar impact probe, as Chandrayaan 1 did. Presumably it will be testing tracking, altimetry etc., and maybe imaging down to the surface in support of the lander scheduled for 2013. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
|
|
|
|
Aug 28 2010, 02:37 PM
Post
#134
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 393 Joined: 23-February 07 From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD Member No.: 1764 |
I can't translate the title, but I suppose it presents a microwave emissivity of the moon regolith. Microwave brightness temperature (there is a color scalebar in K on the plot..) This has an emissivity contribution, but is dominated by the physical temperature which in this case is dominated by latitude. There have been a few papers published on these (nice) data - possibly some of the most solid results from Chang'e so far, or at least results complementary to what everyone else has flown. e.g. LPSC abstract http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2010/pdf/1331.pdf |
|
|
|
Sep 21 2010, 06:34 PM
Post
#135
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1146 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
Lunar microwave temperature maps presented at EPSC
http://lunarscience.arc.nasa.gov/articles/...e-complete-moon -------------------- I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.
James Van Allen |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 10:59 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|