IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

40 Pages V  « < 16 17 18 19 20 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
MSL "Drive, drive, drive" toward Glenelg, The scientists (mostly) get the keys - sols 38-56
Astro0
post Sep 26 2012, 12:16 PM
Post #249


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



Stunning! ohmy.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nix
post Sep 26 2012, 12:47 PM
Post #250


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



QUOTE (EdTruthan @ Sep 26 2012, 12:36 PM) *
"Humongous Anaglyph III"
Sol 45 and Sol 23 MC100 with a 210 meter wide baseline... Yup. Elvis has now left the building...

20016x2267px 6.85MB
-IMG-

The times of day were different, so the shadows are a bit mis-matched, and with such a wide baseline, getting the correct red-blue separation is tricky because close and far objects require lots of eye adjustments. But I could tweak for weeks. Better to share....


Monster anaglyphs could indeed take weeks to tweak.... just a small preview for now huh.gif



what glorious views we're getting these past sols !


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Sep 26 2012, 01:48 PM
Post #251


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The Phobos image reminded me of an early Viking image:

Attached Image


There are some messy JPG artifacts, but a couple of craters are certainly real.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorimancer
post Sep 26 2012, 01:48 PM
Post #252


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 20-April 05
From: League City, Texas
Member No.: 285



QUOTE (fredk @ Sep 25 2012, 10:47 PM) *
...And I don't recall any crescent view of Phobos from MER, though pancam certainly could resolve it....

Given a couple of shots like that, allowing a few degrees of motion between them, I could even envision a stereoscopic perspective of Phobos -- that would be very cool.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Sep 26 2012, 02:37 PM
Post #253


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



It missing just 3 frames to be complete, but WOW.



Ed : amazing work on these anaglyph !


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vikingmars
post Sep 26 2012, 02:49 PM
Post #254


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1083
Joined: 19-February 05
From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France
Member No.: 172



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Sep 26 2012, 03:48 PM) *
There are some messy JPG artifacts, but a couple of craters are certainly real. Phil

Thanks a lot Phil for having found this VO pic !
And there is a good "fit" for its global shape on its night side too with the reflected light from Mars (see enhancement herebelow) :
Attached Image



Plus a link to the "Ciel & Espace" website where the image was published this morning (CET) in France :
http://www.cieletespace.fr/node/9592
Enjoy smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Sep 26 2012, 03:14 PM
Post #255


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



Re Ageis....It's a good idea to get the normal, extremely complicated surface s/w working well, before adding on enhancements, bare in mind, if luck holds out MSL will last more than 10 years. Also long drives will still be posible in the hills, those hills are massive, not "molehills" you can drive around or over in a day.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 26 2012, 03:59 PM
Post #256


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (EdTruthan @ Sep 26 2012, 10:36 AM) *
"Humongous Anaglyph III"
Sol 45 and Sol 23 MC100 with a 210 meter wide baseline... Yup. Elvis has now left the building...
...and is now in z-axis heaven. That's what we've been waiting for. Thanks for all your work on that.

About marsshine on Phobos, I'm skeptical considering all the blocky jpeg artifacts in the sky. But the thought is really interesting. Mars would look huge from Phobos, much bigger than the Earth from the Moon. So if the geometry is right, the marsshine could be very bright. It's hard to see earthshine on the Moon unless the sky is quite dark. But it could be much easier to see marsshine on Phobos...

(Emily - according to Joe's site, the Phobos image was taken at 17:27 LMST, not near local noon. That's consistent with it's orientation at sunset.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Sep 26 2012, 04:01 PM
Post #257


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



Goodness, those images of Phobos are really something.

Sol 50. Looks like we're actually quite close to the edge of the especially interesting terrain. The view after the next drive should be good.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Sep 26 2012, 04:23 PM
Post #258


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Sol 49 panorama in circular form - to help me with rover location.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Sep 26 2012, 04:49 PM
Post #259


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



Sol 49 late afternoon panorama.


And this gave me the need to do a postcard picture with some more sky smile.gif.



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Reckless
post Sep 26 2012, 05:50 PM
Post #260


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 221
Joined: 25-March 05
Member No.: 217



MSL Science update on NASA TV Thursday 27th September at 11 am PDT

Roy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Sep 26 2012, 06:33 PM
Post #261


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Just looking back at the Phobos images from sol 45... I thought it might be useful to combine the two best images to reduce JPG noise... but it looks like there is too much rotation of Phobos (and/or the terminator) for that to work.

PS my daughter informs me that I use too many ...s in my emails to her. I have decided to move them all here instead... enjoy! ...

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ronald
post Sep 26 2012, 08:16 PM
Post #262


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 19-September 12
Member No.: 6658



Stitched out of 12 Mastcam 34 mm images - Sol 49:

Attached Image


Big version here.

Nice texture on the stones and rocks!


And a second-but-not-so-impressive one:

Attached Image


Big version here.

rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 26 2012, 08:24 PM
Post #263


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Sep 26 2012, 06:33 PM) *
it looks like there is too much rotation of Phobos (and/or the terminator) for that to work.
Yeah, I noticed that too. But rotation seems unlikely, since the two frames were taken only 16 seconds apart. Maybe the lower S/N frame is too heavily corrupted by jpeg artifacts?

Anyway, we can hope for cleaner images in the press release tomorrow...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

40 Pages V  « < 16 17 18 19 20 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 03:07 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.