Recent Comments From Steve Squyres, notes from his Houston, Tx presentation |
Recent Comments From Steve Squyres, notes from his Houston, Tx presentation |
Aug 14 2005, 06:45 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
I attended Steve Squyres’ book signing in Houston Thursday. He gave an excellent presentation on the rovers and he did it in his usually energetic and stimulating style. While much of it covered things that fans like us already know, he also showed images from the most recent sols and said a little about recent interpretations. I didn’t take notes, but I did write up some of the more interesting tidbits I remembered after I came home. Here they are in a bullet list format.
Steve said that their recent interpretations of the origins of Methuselah and Voltaire leaned more toward creation from impact events, rather than volcanic processes. He said they hoped to make the summit of Husband Hill in the next couple of weeks. He also said that Spirit's panels were cranking out 900 watt-hours. I know that sounds high, but I’m sure that’s what I heard. He showed an amazing animation that I had not seen previously, demonstrating the rover's rocker-bogie suspension driving over a simulated corrugated surface similar to the dunes of Meridiani. It was very cool, and I wish I could find it online. He also showed that humorous video of a rover putting the RAT up to the face of a rock and grinding. All of a sudden, the teeth bite into the rock and the rover spins wildly around the arm, and throws a wheel into the air. I have been told that animation was created by Dan Maas. It was very well done. Most of the science instruments are in good shape. He mentioned the miniTES that was acting up and then repaired itself, but the only serious problem with an instrument at the moment is the RAT on Spirit. Its diamond blades are shot...no more grinding for it, but it can still brush. They did something like 15 grinds on the mostly very hard rocks in Gusev crater, but it was only designed to do a few grinds. I was able to ask him a couple of questions. I was about to ask what they learned from the rovers that would change the design of the MSL, but someone asked a very similar question first. Someone asked "If you had to do it over again, what would be different about the rovers?" He mentioned two things that I remember. 1. He wanted nuclear power. 2. He wanted the ability to analyze for more things, like organic molecules. I'm sure he would have gone into more details if the audience was more technically oriented. I asked him two questions. My first question was, “If you are able to make it to the summit of Husband Hill and take a monster panorama, where do you go next?” He said they didn't know exactly, but they would definitely head south. He mentioned there were some layered rocks on the south side that they might want to take a look at. I assume those are the ones near the base of the south side of the hill. He said they might move down from the summit, toward the south a bit, and then take a south-facing panorama. I assume they want to go down to the south a bit to get a better view of the area close to the base of the hill, where those layered outcrops are. My second question was, “What do you expect to find with Opportunity, now that you are entering the etched terrain? I wanted to know what he thought it would look like and what kind of science he expected to do in an environment where the rocks were exposed on the surface, rather than in the walls of a crater. By this time I felt as if I was pushing my luck, asking too much, while others still had questions. I wasn’t able to ask all that I wanted to know, but he said they were happy to learn that the etched terrain had a lot of rock, and not a lot of light-colored, rover-trapping dunes. But of course, we already knew that from his updates and the imagery. He said the amount of time they would spend in the etched terrain would depend on how much new science they could do. He did say Victoria will be next, and if the etched terrain offers little new science, they will head directly toward Victoria Crater. I think Steve said Victoria had 40 meter tall outcrops. Oh, one more interesting thing. CSPAN was there, recording the event. So, Steve Squyres’ presentation may be broadcast on that channel, and might possibly be turned into a realmedia stream at their web site. Sorry for the length of this post, but it seemed there was a lot that others would find interesting. I hope I presented it accurately. -------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
Aug 14 2005, 07:03 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 236 Joined: 21-June 05 Member No.: 417 |
Spinning Rover:
http://images.spaceref.com/news/2004/rover.armspin.mov |
|
|
Aug 14 2005, 10:05 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 713 Joined: 30-March 05 Member No.: 223 |
Thanks a lot for the detailed report, CosmicRocker !
I especially like the following part: QUOTE He said the amount of time they would spend in the etched terrain would depend on how much new science they could do. He did say Victoria will be next, and if the etched terrain offers little new science, they will head directly toward Victoria Crater. I think Steve said Victoria had 40 meter tall outcrops. IMHO this would be the best strategy to maximise the scientific use of the remaing Rover lifetime |
|
|
Aug 14 2005, 11:35 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 153 Joined: 11-December 04 Member No.: 120 |
As the mythbusters would say: "Does the fun ever stop?"
|
|
|
Aug 14 2005, 02:16 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
Great report, thanks. I can't wait for that south-facing pan!
|
|
|
Aug 14 2005, 03:45 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
"When will the fun EVER stop
.. am I missing an eye brow" Doug |
|
|
Aug 14 2005, 08:45 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Dublin Correspondent Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
QUOTE (CosmicRocker @ Aug 14 2005, 07:45 AM) He also said that Spirit's panels were cranking out 900 watt-hours. I know that sounds high, but I’m sure that’s what I heard. Excellent news - that's about 200 watts more than my extrapolation from the last confirmed spirit value. Some of that's due to the favourable orientation but clearly the dust cleaning martians have been keeping up the good work. |
|
|
Aug 14 2005, 08:51 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
QUOTE (helvick @ Aug 14 2005, 09:45 PM) Excellent news - that's about 200 watts more than my extrapolation from the last confirmed spirit value. Some of that's due to the favourable orientation but clearly the dust cleaning martians have been keeping up the good work. What does the 200W extra do for the projected Rover death graph? -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
Aug 14 2005, 09:30 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Dublin Correspondent Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Aug 14 2005, 09:51 PM) Well if all other things remain equal the Solar Panel output drops to 280 on sol 988 with the minimum of 275 watts reached on Sol 1030. Prior to this my estimate was that Spirit would drop to 280 watts on Sol 829, with a minimum of 216 reached on Sol 1020. The "all other things being equal" is a big if but it's excellent news none the less. |
|
|
Aug 15 2005, 01:20 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 320 Joined: 19-June 04 Member No.: 85 |
Wow, that's amazing, helvick, we're looking at the rovers carrying on at least into June 2006, if the current trend is maintained
-------------------- |
|
|
Aug 15 2005, 02:46 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 91 Joined: 27-January 05 From: Arlington, Virginia Member No.: 159 |
One factor that has to be considered is the increasing altitude of Spirit over the plains. With such a thin atmosphere, there has to be a sharp drop-off in dust content even at the top of martian hills. If this is a factor, it makes the thought of decending down the South side of the hill going into winter a more daunting one.
|
|
|
Aug 15 2005, 04:37 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 477 Joined: 2-March 05 Member No.: 180 |
QUOTE (general @ Aug 14 2005, 02:03 AM) Thanks for the link. The power output, 900W - what is the rated output of those solar cells? Like, what were they at when the rovers first deployed them? That's just crazy that it's this high again. And thank you of course to Cosmic Rocker for the update. Did you see anyone there with a videocamera? |
|
|
Aug 15 2005, 05:18 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
-------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
Aug 15 2005, 08:09 AM
Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
QUOTE (babakm @ Aug 15 2005, 03:46 AM) One factor that has to be considered is the increasing altitude of Spirit over the plains. With such a thin atmosphere, there has to be a sharp drop-off in dust content even at the top of martian hills. If this is a factor, it makes the thought of decending down the South side of the hill going into winter a more daunting one. Somehow, I don't think so. The pressure difference on Mars between 'sea level' and any given altitude is proportionally LESS than on Earth, and the Columbia Hills are actually very low. And Martian dust - the thin, light stuff - gets *very* high (remember the proposed sample return mission which was going to pick up dust during an aerobraking pass and return directly to earth?). For all that MER is a brilliant success, it's in many ways not so much a Rover as a fixed lander that can, er, move. A human being would be at the top of the hills before the first morning was half over... ...we're not exactly in the Himalayas, so need not be particularly worried about the terrors of the mountains! -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
Aug 15 2005, 12:49 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
QUOTE (aldo12xu @ Aug 14 2005, 08:20 PM) Wow, that's amazing, helvick, we're looking at the rovers carrying on at least into June 2006, if the current trend is maintained From page 187 of Squyres' book, Roving Mars: "If we launched in 2005, we'd arrive at Mars when the planet was far from the sun and when it was almost as far away from Earth as it ever gets. Solar power would be bad, and communication to Earth would be awful. The mission was so bad in 2005 that it wasn't clear that it made sense to fly it at all." It would be amazing if the rovers lasted into spring of 2006 when the mission prognosis for that time was so bad, even for a freshly delivered rover. To think that at least one of the rovers may end up doing just that boggles the mind! |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 09:31 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |