IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Massive Subsurface Ice Deposits in Southern Hemisphere, MARSIS results - LPSC 2006
JonClarke
post Oct 20 2006, 01:04 AM
Post #16


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 112
Joined: 17-November 05
From: Canberra
Member No.: 558



QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Oct 16 2006, 03:27 PM) *
I can appreciate the artistic enhancement that is added in many of these Mars Express images, but that image of Vastitas Borealis is just plain weird looking. Does anyone know if this is an overlay of a MARSIS image? Or just some over-zealous image retouching?

http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Mars_Express/SEMADOV74TE_0.html


It's actually Deuteronilus Mensae, not Vasitas Borealis. It is is a very nice oblique 3D rendering of a HRSC imaging showing plastic material flowing out of a circular degression away from the viewing point and then to the left. Lots of features suggest ice-like behaviour - an apparent bergsrund where the material laps up against the edge of the circular feature, apparent crevasses, media flow ridges, and zones of stagnation (which even have scattered craters, suggesting that in some areas the plastic material is quite old).

So it is has nothing to do with MARSIS, there is no overlay, and there certainly has not been any retouching.

Jon
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SteveM
post Oct 20 2006, 01:34 AM
Post #17


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 267
Joined: 5-February 06
Member No.: 675



QUOTE (JonClarke @ Oct 19 2006, 09:04 PM) *
It's actually Deuteronilus Mensae, not Vasitas Borealis. It is is a very nice oblique 3D rendering of a HRSC imaging showing plastic material flowing out of a circular degression away from the viewing point and then to the left. Lots of features suggest ice-like behaviour - an apparent bergsrund where the material laps up against the edge of the circular feature, apparent crevasses, media flow ridges, and zones of stagnation (which even have scattered craters, suggesting that in some areas the plastic material is quite old).

So it is has nothing to do with MARSIS, there is no overlay, and there certainly has not been any retouching.

Jon
I think you and Dan are talking at cross purposes. You're describing Deutronilus Mensae but he seems to be referring to the fourth image on that page showing Vasitas Borealis, which has a large circle of blueish white material, identified as ice, in the center of the crater.

In any event, I agree with you that there isn't any retouching. The colors look artificial but Mars is stranger than we expect.

Steve
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JonClarke
post Oct 20 2006, 06:05 AM
Post #18


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 112
Joined: 17-November 05
From: Canberra
Member No.: 558



QUOTE (Steve @ Oct 20 2006, 01:34 AM) *
I think you and Dan are talking at cross purposes. You're describing Deutronilus Mensae but he seems to be referring to the fourth image on that page showing Vasitas Borealis, which has a large circle of blueish white material, identified as ice, in the center of the crater.

In any event, I agree with you that there isn't any retouching. The colors look artificial but Mars is stranger than we expect.

Steve


Ah, silly me. That was the only strange looking image (for me) on the page so I assumed that was the one meant.

The fourth image is perhaps the most famous, popular, and beautiful HRSC image yet. It shows a dome like deposit of white ice on an unnamed crater floor. The feature has been observed by MOC also, although none of those images have quite the same aesthetic appeal. It is perhaps the southernmost surface exposure of water ice in the Martian north polar region. I love the frost on the crater rim as well. No retouching, and I think the colour is great.

Jon
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Mar 13 2007, 12:36 PM
Post #19


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



Some information about what MARSIS is doing and not doing.


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marz
post Mar 13 2007, 03:52 PM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 311
Joined: 31-August 05
From: Florida & Texas, USA
Member No.: 482



QUOTE (ustrax @ Mar 13 2007, 07:36 AM) *
Some information about what MARSIS is doing and not doing.


"And liquid water? Do we have answers to where it might be?

MARSIS data inversion on the south pole has found compatibility with water dielectric constant. According to the geologist opinion in many areas at medium latitude could be possible to find subsurface water traces."


Exciting stuff! I wonder what depth are the medium latitude water deposits expected?

142 days until phoenix launches.... and counting. It'll be nice to put some "ground truth" to MARSIS results on the poles.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Harder
post Mar 15 2007, 09:09 PM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 13-July 05
From: The Hague, NL
Member No.: 434



More on the ice deposits at the Southern Hemisphere..
I read that in the next edition of Science a team of German scientist will report on the presence of a massive 1.6 million cubic km of almost pure water ice at the South pole of Mars. If that lot melts, Mars would be covered in 11 m water.
Anyone with access to Science who can add to this rather brief announcement?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Tamlyn
post Mar 15 2007, 09:19 PM
Post #22


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 443
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



JPL has a press release up on its site: "Mars' South Pole Ice Deep and Wide".

It wasn't clear to me on a hasty comparison with last year's announcements how much of this is really news.

It looks as though the hypothetical depth if the ice was melted rendered liquid has been increased from ten feet to eleven feet.

TTT

Edit: As subsequent posts pointed out, that should be from ten to eleven meters.

This post has been edited by Tom Tamlyn: Mar 16 2007, 02:22 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MarsIsImportant
post Mar 16 2007, 03:51 AM
Post #23


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 258
Joined: 22-December 06
Member No.: 1503



Last year's announcement included speculation that if held true, then melting would cover the planet 10 meters in water. This new announcement is very different in that it is not only confirmation of what they once thought MIGHT be true, but also additional ice has now been found and confirmed.

Then it was speculation on quantity; now it is fact.

This is just ice in the South Polar area. I wonder how much additional ice is at the North Pole.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Mar 16 2007, 10:25 AM
Post #24


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



ESA's news release.


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Harder
post Mar 16 2007, 12:05 PM
Post #25


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 13-July 05
From: The Hague, NL
Member No.: 434



With so much water now positively identified it may be time to change our mindset about Mars.
Where the research started tentatively with "Follow the Water" it seems appropriate to start thinking in terms of "Mars Water Missions".
Both EU and USA are developing new Flagship missions and, with all respect, why travel to Jupiter & beyond for water when it is relatively speaking at our doorstep on Mars?

Not so long ago there was also a mention of Methane being detected on Mars. Whilst this may still be a "whiff" in scientific terms, i.e. not so firm as this confirmation of the presence of water, I would say that the combination of these two gives a very clear steer if not an overwhelming case for developing Detecting Life (or LIfe-artifact) studies on Mars.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Mar 16 2007, 12:16 PM
Post #26


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



QUOTE (Harder @ Mar 16 2007, 12:05 PM) *
I would say that the combination of these two gives a very clear steer if not an overwhelming case for developing Detecting Life (or LIfe-artifact) studies on Mars.


Or on the right path aren't we?... smile.gif


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Mar 16 2007, 02:31 PM
Post #27


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (Harder @ Mar 16 2007, 08:05 AM) *
...why travel to Jupiter & beyond for water when it is relatively speaking at our doorstep on Mars?

You're joking of course.(?) Studying the global sea of Europa is a whole nuther ballgame.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Mar 16 2007, 03:34 PM
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2530
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



One of the things this gets me thinking about is what would have happened, historically, when a major impact hit one of these polar ice sheets. Many tens of km of water ice could be vaporized, and H2O ice is on the order of 100,000 times denser than the current martian atmosphere. Some CO2 would be released as well. It seems like a big impact could have doubled the martian atmosphere whereas a truly colossal basin-creating impact could create a martian atmosphere more comparable to Earth's in extent. That H2O would probably end up deposited globally as an ice layer of cm (?), then sublimate away in the equatorial regions and gradually end up poleward. This would be create a limited catastrophic water cycle that may have "turned" just a few times in martian history.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cndwrld
post Mar 16 2007, 09:08 PM
Post #29


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 247
Joined: 17-February 07
From: ESAC, cerca Madrid, Spain.
Member No.: 1743



All this great news about the ice deposits is a great testament to the operations people who got MARSIS working. The ESA web site details some of the long delays in getting those weird MARSIS booms deployed, and the problems they had when they finally did it. The good news took many frustrating years of patience.

Let's hope this is a big help to the Phoenix team. I hope their search starts as well as this European mission did:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryd9udbh6X8

-don


--------------------
--
cndwrld@yahoo.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MarsIsImportant
post Mar 16 2007, 10:45 PM
Post #30


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 258
Joined: 22-December 06
Member No.: 1503



Although this is great news with significant implications, MARSIS still has a lot of work to do. Since it has been determined that only about 4% of the original water on Mars could have been lost to space, that leaves 95% missing. This particular discovery only finds about 10% of that missing water. Let's assume that the North Polar region has a similar amount of ice locked up underneath. That means 75% of the original water on Mars is still missing. Perhaps the reservoirs found closer to the equator make up a few percentages. Now that means 70% of the water is missing. Where is it?

My guess is that there are additional HUGE reservoirs underground over a variety of areas on Mars. MARSIS should be able to find some of them. That means it still needs to do a survey over the entire planet. With the core of Mars being much cooler than Earth, water could easily have penetrated underground MUCH deeper. The question is: how deep?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 12:41 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.