MAVEN development to orbit insertion |
MAVEN development to orbit insertion |
Nov 18 2013, 10:53 PM
Post
#61
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 21-April 05 From: Rochester, New York, USA Member No.: 336 |
And now we wait...
|
|
|
Nov 19 2013, 12:41 PM
Post
#62
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 153 Joined: 4-May 11 From: Pardubice, CZ Member No.: 5979 |
And now we wait... Not really ... they will communicate (nice DSN visualisation ) And other activities will also happen: - Two to three weeks after launch, most of MAVEN’s instruments will power up for the first time and perform a post-launch checkout. - The 6 instruments in MAVEN's Particles and Fields (P&F) Package will remain powered on and will collect data during the cruise to Mars. - During the MAVEN cruise phase, flight operators will execute at least four trajectory correction maneuvers (TCMs). |
|
|
Nov 19 2013, 04:33 PM
Post
#63
|
|
Forum Contributor Group: Members Posts: 1372 Joined: 8-February 04 From: North East Florida, USA. Member No.: 11 |
Also they plan to observe comet ISON, if ISON survives it's trip around the back of the Sun.
|
|
|
Nov 22 2013, 06:14 PM
Post
#64
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
some info on the ISON observations https://dnnpro.outer.jhuapl.edu/Portals/32/...n2_crismani.pdf
|
|
|
Dec 6 2013, 03:25 PM
Post
#65
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 89 Joined: 27-August 05 From: Eccentric Mars orbit Member No.: 477 |
Two instruments have been turned on and checked out: NGIMS and IUVS.
https://www.facebook.com/MAVEN2Mars |
|
|
Jan 27 2014, 09:00 PM
Post
#66
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
in case anyone is interested, I recently asked to the MAVEN twitter account whether they went ahead with the planned observations of comet ISON or not and this was the answer:
QUOTE UVS took 12,000 images in 10 modes (12/11-12/13), originally slated for ISON observation, but useful for diagnostic data obtained
|
|
|
Mar 17 2014, 12:38 PM
Post
#67
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 102 Joined: 8-August 12 Member No.: 6511 |
So MAVEN has already done a couple of Trajectory Correction Maneuvers without any problems. The last, TCM-2, was on February 27. TCM-3 is currently scheduled for September. The MAVEN team is also keeping busy with instrument tests; cruise is only 10 months, so apparently it's actually a pretty busy time.
Anyway, question: at what point would MAVEN get its own subforum under "Orbiters"? After it has successfully achieved Mars orbit and started its nominal mission? Doug M. |
|
|
Mar 17 2014, 05:58 PM
Post
#68
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2014, 10:00 AM
Post
#69
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 547 Joined: 1-May 06 From: Scotland (Ecosse, Escocia) Member No.: 759 |
I was going to ask it too... same for MOM Yes, I was also wondering today about India's MOM. It had a successful trajectory correction on June 11, and is due to make another this coming Sunday 14 Sept. The plan is for Mars orbit insertion on September 24, two days after Maven. India MOM Updates MOM mission overview |
|
|
Sep 20 2014, 04:22 PM
Post
#70
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 61 Joined: 20-March 10 From: Western Australia Member No.: 5275 |
Guys, here she comes.
Fingers crossed. |
|
|
Sep 20 2014, 08:37 PM
Post
#71
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 28 Joined: 1-July 13 From: United Kingdom, England Member No.: 6965 |
Once ub orbit, then orbital position will need adjusting over a month or so. I'm sure soon enough we'll start getting some data in after that objective is complete.
|
|
|
Sep 21 2014, 05:23 AM
Post
#72
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 18-December 07 From: New York Member No.: 3982 |
What factors lead the team to opt for a series of engine burns to lower the 35 hour capture orbit to the 4.5 hour science orbit instead of the now "standard" aerobraking?
I've tried searching the forum and Google for an answer and can't find one. |
|
|
Sep 21 2014, 02:18 PM
Post
#73
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
If you don't need to use aerobraking....why bother. It takes time, has its own risks, and incurs operational costs. It was an enabling technique for MGS, MODY and MRO. MAVEN can get to the orbit it needs to without aerobraking. It's not like carrying extra propellant cost them anything, they used the lightest launch vehicle available.
|
|
|
Sep 21 2014, 04:54 PM
Post
#74
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2080 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
There will be quite a bit of aerobraking during the science mission itself, though. That's the whole point of the unique solar panel shape, so as to fly through the atmosphere lower than any other orbiter has gotten.
|
|
|
Sep 21 2014, 07:08 PM
Post
#75
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10149 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Also... it's a mistake to think of something as standard if the people involved have never done it before. One reason for other nations to fly these kinds of missions (lunar orbiters, landers, Mars orbiters) is to develop those skills themselves. Until they have done it, it is anything but standard.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd April 2024 - 12:18 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |