IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
NH transmission times?
pjm
post Apr 11 2006, 06:32 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 20-January 06
From: io80xr
Member No.: 651



Hi folks,

I'm wondering if anyone here knows specifics of transmission times from the NH space craft to DSN tracking stations? There is some vague information on the JPL RAPWEB pages about long range forcasts of DSN resource useage, but nothing specific about start / end days and times. Even though NH is fairly far away, it should be possible to detect signals from it, whilst its less than a couple of hundred million miles from Earth.

regards,

Paul.
contributor to http://www.uhf-satcom.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Apr 11 2006, 06:42 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



Why are you interested to catch any NH's signaling? Theirs are only useful for the John Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory and nothing else. huh.gif

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Apr 11 2006, 06:47 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



Rodolfo:

I think, basically, you'll find that it's 'cos he *can*! And wouldn't *you*?

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Apr 11 2006, 06:49 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Apr 11 2006, 01:47 PM) *
Rodolfo:

I think, basically, you'll find that it's 'cos he *can*! And wouldn't *you*?

Bob Shaw

Yeah, it is a kind of game!

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pjm
post Apr 11 2006, 06:51 PM
Post #5


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 20-January 06
From: io80xr
Member No.: 651



QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Apr 11 2006, 07:42 PM) *
Why are you interested to catch any NH's signaling? Theirs are only useful for the John Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory and nothing else. huh.gif

Rodolfo


Hi,

Well I'm not really interested in the signalling, just to detect the carrier / tracking beacon. Demodulation isnt possible with small antennas, due to the low signal to noise ratio. But the technical challenge is making a receive system that can detect such small signals, thats all. I'm preparing a peltier cooled low noise amplifier which should add another 0.5dB SNR over my current setup.

cheers,

Paul
www.uhf-satcom.com


--------------------

Paul Marsh - ham callsign = M0EYT
Contributor to www.uhf-satcom.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Apr 11 2006, 07:57 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (pjm @ Apr 11 2006, 11:32 AM) *
There is some vague information on the JPL RAPWEB pages about long range forcasts of DSN resource useage, but nothing specific about start / end days and times.

Try going to the mid-range scheduling page; you can download the DSN schedule, and look for "NHPC" tracking passes.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pjm
post Apr 11 2006, 08:11 PM
Post #7


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 20-January 06
From: io80xr
Member No.: 651



QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Apr 11 2006, 08:57 PM) *
Try going to the mid-range scheduling page; you can download the DSN schedule, and look for "NHPC" tracking passes.


Hi,

Yep I've looked there, the problem I have is that the medium range stuff is quite far in the future, and time is running out for opportunities to detect a signal, due to the rapidly increasing distance! The other factor that is unknown is the downlink frequency, so based on nasa's JPL horizons predictions for the space craft, we work out the doppler for every DSN channel then plod through looking for any signs of activity.

I have calculated that the signal should be stronger than that from the ESA Rosetta probe which is considerably further away, so I should be able to detect something.....

regards,

Paul
www.uhf-satcom.com


--------------------

Paul Marsh - ham callsign = M0EYT
Contributor to www.uhf-satcom.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Apr 11 2006, 09:54 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (pjm @ Apr 11 2006, 01:11 PM) *
the problem I have is that the medium range stuff is quite far in the future... The other factor that is unknown is the downlink frequency...

June is far in the future? OK, I can see how that might be true from your perspective.

http://www.cdscc.nasa.gov/Pages/pg03_trackingtoday.html has a partial daily schedule for Canberra. One could figure out the RA/Dec of NH and decide approximately when a pass could occur. I can't find the frequency allocation anywhere, and a detailed schedule would have to come via the project. If Alan Stern is reading this, he would be a good source.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pjm
post Apr 11 2006, 10:05 PM
Post #9


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 20-January 06
From: io80xr
Member No.: 651



QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Apr 11 2006, 10:54 PM) *
June is far in the future? OK, I can see how that might be true from your perspective.

http://www.cdscc.nasa.gov/Pages/pg03_trackingtoday.html has a partial daily schedule for Canberra. One could figure out the RA/Dec of NH and decide approximately when a pass could occur. I can't find the frequency allocation anywhere, and a detailed schedule would have to come via the project. If Alan Stern is reading this, he would be a good source.


Hi, yes thanks for that link, i'd not seen that one before. Interesting that today DSS45 is tracking MRO and NHPC. I've copied the 3 mars orbiters today, and VEX this morning, but have been searching for NHPC for weeks with no trace. I think its on DSN channel 31 or 32. 8438.086418 or 8439.444446 in MHz.

OK so now its back to searching through the channels for an hour, until midnight here.

regards,

Paul
www.uhf-satcom.com


--------------------

Paul Marsh - ham callsign = M0EYT
Contributor to www.uhf-satcom.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pjm
post Apr 12 2006, 10:19 PM
Post #10


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 20-January 06
From: io80xr
Member No.: 651



Hi all,

OK I can now cross NHPC off my list of space-craft to hear. Just managed to detect in FFT the tracking beacon from new horizons, using a 1.8m dish and home made receiver.

Brief write up at http://www.uhf-satcom.com/newhorizons/

cheers,

Paul.


--------------------

Paul Marsh - ham callsign = M0EYT
Contributor to www.uhf-satcom.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Apr 12 2006, 10:39 PM
Post #11


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



QUOTE (pjm @ Apr 12 2006, 10:19 PM) *
OK I can now cross NHPC off my list of space-craft to hear. Just managed to detect in FFT the tracking beacon from new horizons, using a 1.8m dish and home made receiver.

Your score card is looking seriously impressive I must say. So how far away is your setup from being able to actually get data from such a signal?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Apr 13 2006, 06:31 AM
Post #12


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Wow - given that VEX, MEX, MRO and MO were your previous targets, NH - beyond Mars, must be a new personal best - now you've got it once, hopefully you'll be able to really stretch the hardware and see how far out you can manage to still hear it!


Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pjm
post Apr 13 2006, 07:17 AM
Post #13


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 20-January 06
From: io80xr
Member No.: 651



QUOTE (djellison @ Apr 13 2006, 07:31 AM) *
Wow - given that VEX, MEX, MRO and MO were your previous targets, NH - beyond Mars, must be a new personal best - now you've got it once, hopefully you'll be able to really stretch the hardware and see how far out you can manage to still hear it!
Doug


Hi,

Well the above list of space craft are pretty close really. My current best DX with the little dish is the ESA rosetta (http://www.uhf-satcom.com/rosetta/) which at the time of reception was 242,198,000 miles away, so about 12dB further than NHPC. Also last night I managed to catch the Mars Global Surveyor, so I've now bagged all mars orbiters (that I can find info on that is)

There is a Mercury probe (messenger) that might be worth a listen, although its only got a small patch antenna for TX so may be pushing the limits of my system bigtime.

cheers,

Paul


--------------------

Paul Marsh - ham callsign = M0EYT
Contributor to www.uhf-satcom.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Apr 13 2006, 12:18 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



Paul:

What would it take to extract data, particularly with global arrays of amateurs? I'm not talking about big images, just nice, compact science data...

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pjm
post Apr 13 2006, 01:04 PM
Post #15


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 20-January 06
From: io80xr
Member No.: 651



QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Apr 13 2006, 01:18 PM) *
Paul:

What would it take to extract data, particularly with global arrays of amateurs? I'm not talking about big images, just nice, compact science data...

Bob Shaw


Hi,

Well for a start, a bigger dish would be essential - it would be possible to phase several large antenna up, but it would need good frequency and time control at each site - i.e. gps locked oscillators, and phase coherant receivers. The major issue would be getting protocol information and the details relating to the modulation scheme of the space-craft. Detecting the signal is fine, but doing anything useful is difficult. I saw the very first MRO hi-res picture come from Mars, in the FFT you could clearly see the sidebands of data, but its just too weak to copy. Its probably possible for amateurs to do something, but it would need a fair amount of time / money to produce useable data.

regards,

Paul


--------------------

Paul Marsh - ham callsign = M0EYT
Contributor to www.uhf-satcom.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 02:57 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.