MSL at Rocknest, First scoop samples - sols 57-101 |
MSL at Rocknest, First scoop samples - sols 57-101 |
Nov 14 2012, 02:21 AM
Post
#451
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10146 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Good one!
Scoop Stooke, Ace Reporter -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 11:51 AM
Post
#452
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 215 Joined: 23-October 12 From: Russia Member No.: 6725 |
It will seems still the sixth scoop...
"We received good data from this first solid sample," said SAM Principal Investigator Paul Mahaffy of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. "We have a lot of data analysis to do, and we are planning to get additional samples of Rocknest material to add confidence about what we learn." Fifth scoop anaglyph and martian dust monitoring -------------------- My blog on Patreon
|
|
|
Guest_Actionman_* |
Nov 14 2012, 12:41 PM
Post
#453
|
Guests |
|
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 03:22 PM
Post
#454
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4246 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
martian dust monitoring Nice comparison. But the ground well away from the landing plume also changes between the three frames - check out the far upper left corner. Could it be that the image processing isn't identical between the three frames? Perhaps the contrast is higher in the earlier frames, which makes the plume more apparent?
|
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 07:06 PM
Post
#455
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 215 Joined: 23-October 12 From: Russia Member No.: 6725 |
The Sun was possible for the sol 6 is lower to a surface. Therefore the relief seems more contrastly.
-------------------- My blog on Patreon
|
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 07:25 PM
Post
#456
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
FredK's point is that things nowhere near the plume are also changing color during the animation (and they wont have done so) - so there's a problem with the correlation of the images. You're not comparing like with like.
|
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 07:31 PM
Post
#457
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10146 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/news/item/sol...-meeting-at-apl
Could lead to another sol or two of delay. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 10:21 PM
Post
#458
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
371 images (so far!), 21144 control points and many, many hours of processing time on my 5 year old computer.
Gigapan: http://gigapan.com/gigapans/118482 James -------------------- |
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 11:13 PM
Post
#459
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Holy wow!! Does this include all the MR images from this pan that have been downlinked so far? Are there more thumbnails down that indicate that there are other areas yet to be filled in?
Another question: There's a noticeable boundary in the panorama toward the right edge, where it's clear that the images were taken at very different times of day. Is there a reason you didn't choose to place that boundary at the edge of the panorama? I don't see a correspondingly jarring one on the left side of the pan. (That is *not* a critique. I'm thankful you spent the time and effort to assemble this.) -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 11:49 PM
Post
#460
|
||
Member Group: Members Posts: 215 Joined: 23-October 12 From: Russia Member No.: 6725 |
371 images (so far!) Monumentally! You're not comparing like with like. I think now better -------------------- My blog on Patreon
|
|
|
||
Nov 14 2012, 11:59 PM
Post
#461
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 593 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 279 |
Fantastic, James - I'll be spending the next "wee while" wandering around here.
...though my very first zoom-in landed unerringly on the Rocknest Seal, seen here basking by a small crater... |
|
|
Nov 15 2012, 08:20 AM
Post
#462
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
Holy wow!! Does this include all the MR images from this pan that have been downlinked so far? Are there more thumbnails down that indicate that there are other areas yet to be filled in? Yes, that is (just about, as of a couple of days ago) all that have been downlinked so far. And yes, there are loads more thumbnails, so there is much more to come. Another question: There's a noticeable boundary in the panorama toward the right edge, where it's clear that the images were taken at very different times of day. Is there a reason you didn't choose to place that boundary at the edge of the panorama? I don't see a correspondingly jarring one on the left side of the pan. I have not adjusted the postition of the wrap boundary at all, doing anything with this much data is a click into the unknown. It is essentially centred on the first image taken. There are a number of boundaries where images are taken at very different times which made the matching a bit of a headache at times! I will use this version to refine my next. This was mainly a first attempt to see it I could actually handle this much data (success!) there will be more refinements as more data comes in. BTW, for those zooming in, I have noticed the black dots/line across the middle. I think this is a bug/limitation in Enblend with very large images. I may try to complile a newer version, I'm using the old version that comes with Hugin for OSX. Failing that I need to find a way of editing it out (or find or write a new blender) -------------------- |
|
|
Nov 15 2012, 03:44 PM
Post
#463
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 17-March 05 Member No.: 206 |
|
|
|
Nov 15 2012, 05:36 PM
Post
#464
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2817 Joined: 22-April 05 From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands Member No.: 353 |
|
|
|
Nov 15 2012, 06:49 PM
Post
#465
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 11:24 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |