IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

72 Pages V  « < 66 67 68 69 70 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Getting Unstuck in West Valley
RobertEB
post Oct 23 2009, 04:12 PM
Post #1006


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 57
Joined: 17-May 06
From: Houston, Texas
Member No.: 776



QUOTE (Tman @ Oct 21 2009, 01:00 AM) *
You're right, going back and reinterpret all the fascinating stuff would be great too and with all the calibrated data accessible now, one could rework many images/pans and animations we did then.

One thing I would still wish is that Spirit could reach finally a higher spot to get better sight over the plain.


I wanted to get a closer look at Pitchers Mound.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Oct 23 2009, 04:46 PM
Post #1007


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



If we do get out, I have to wonder about further embedding events. We did remarkably well on our drive from the WH3 area. And we are more than a third of the way to VB/G from WH3. So if Troy is an anomaly, we can expect to get a lot closer to VB/G. I wonder what the thinking is on this with the team, and whether they have any ideas on how to avoid potential Troys in the future.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Oct 23 2009, 05:43 PM
Post #1008


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (Tman @ Oct 21 2009, 02:00 AM) *
One thing I would still wish is that Spirit could reach finally a higher spot to get better sight over the plain.

Higher than the top of Husband Hill?!
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Oct 23 2009, 06:10 PM
Post #1009


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



McCool Hill was found to be SLIGHTLY higher smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tman
post Oct 23 2009, 06:21 PM
Post #1010


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



You mean OUR Love... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDyoMOHrH9c


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Oct 23 2009, 07:55 PM
Post #1011


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2918
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 23 2009, 08:10 PM) *
McCool Hill was found to be SLIGHTLY higher smile.gif

So they named the top of Husband Hill "Everest", saving "Olympus Mons" for McCool's I'd said blink.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Oct 27 2009, 03:41 PM
Post #1012


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Looks like the review will take place this Wednesday, from Maxwell's blog.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CryptoEngineer
post Oct 27 2009, 06:25 PM
Post #1013


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: 5-June 06
Member No.: 803



QUOTE (climber @ Oct 23 2009, 03:55 PM) *
So they named the top of Husband Hill "Everest", saving "Olympus Mons" for McCool's I'd said blink.gif


I don't know exactly what the naming rules are, but I'd be astonished if they allowed naming a hill on Mars after a hill on Mars. That would be ... confusing.

How about "Kilauea"?

ce
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Oct 27 2009, 06:39 PM
Post #1014


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (climber @ Oct 23 2009, 07:55 PM) *
So they named the top of Husband Hill "Everest", saving "Olympus Mons" for McCool's I'd said blink.gif


They thought Husband was higher. It wasn't until doing basic trig from the top of it, they discovered McCool to be a few metres higher.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Oct 27 2009, 09:30 PM
Post #1015


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2918
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 27 2009, 07:39 PM) *
They thought Husband was higher. It wasn't until doing basic trig from the top of it, they discovered McCool to be a few metres higher.

Thanks for this Doug, I didn't know.
An whaouu, I love "ce" statment of Olympus Mons been a "hill on Mars" biggrin.gif . Isn't it the tallest mountains of the solar system? tongue.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vultur
post Oct 27 2009, 10:28 PM
Post #1016


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 202
Joined: 9-September 08
Member No.: 4334



QUOTE (CryptoEngineer @ Oct 27 2009, 06:25 PM) *
How about "Kilauea"?


Well, if you measure from the base of the mountain rather than from sea level, Mauna Kea is Earth's highest mountain - it's just that 6000 meters of it is underwater.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CryptoEngineer
post Oct 28 2009, 05:27 PM
Post #1017


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: 5-June 06
Member No.: 803



QUOTE (climber @ Oct 27 2009, 04:30 PM) *
Thanks for this Doug, I didn't know.
An whaouu, I love "ce" statment of Olympus Mons been a "hill on Mars" biggrin.gif . Isn't it the tallest mountains of the solar system? tongue.gif


I was quite aware of the disparity in size. The point remains; having two Olympus Mons on Mars would be source of confusion, even if one is a thousand times the size of the other.

As others have pointed out, Mauna Kea is actually higher than Kilauea; I was just more familiar with Kilauea since it is active, MK is dormant.

Both are peaks on the Big Island of Hawaii, Mauna Kea rises 10,203m above its seafloor base. Olympus Mons is 27,000m high.

ce
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Oct 28 2009, 05:27 PM
Post #1018


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



From Scott Maxwell's twitter page

QUOTE
Today's the big review: if we pass this, we're ready to start extricating Spirit Nov 9-ish (assuming no *other* problems). #FreeSpirit
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Oct 28 2009, 07:29 PM
Post #1019


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



"I don't know exactly what the naming rules are, but I'd be astonished if they allowed naming a hill on Mars after a hill on Mars. That would be ... confusing."

Not to worry, these are only informal names, very mission-specific. You're right that no formal naming of that type would be permitted. But look at the Moon, where craters at some Apollo sites (Sharp, Nansen etc.) received the same names as existing craters. When some of them were made official, the landing site names were changed (Sharp-Apollo, Nansen-Apollo etc.) to remove the uncertainty.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Oct 28 2009, 08:27 PM
Post #1020


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2918
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (CryptoEngineer @ Oct 28 2009, 06:27 PM) *
I was just more familiar with Kilauea since it is active...
ce

Pretty right on this biggrin.gif
(Family & me by mid of august this year)
Attached Image




Sorry ce, I know what you mean about Olympus Mons.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

72 Pages V  « < 66 67 68 69 70 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 04:11 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.