IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Niles and Michalski Abstract, Ancient or not so ancient clays on Mars?
schaffman
post Feb 8 2012, 02:46 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 55
Joined: 6-March 10
From: Cincinnati, OH
Member No.: 5246



I looked through several of the 2012 LPSC abstracts on the MSL landing site at Gale Crater and was struck by the Niles and Michalski paper (http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2012/pdf/2575.pdf.)

An unstated implication of their hypothesis is that the phyllosilicates (clay minerals) at the base of the mound may have formed by brines percolating through the mound. If so, then the clay-bearing “beds” detected by CRISM (reported by Miliken et al., 2010, http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2010/2009GL041870.shtml [abstract only]) may not be recording climate conditions of very ancient Mars (when neutral or alkaline surface water was presumably abundant) but a secondary alteration of (basaltic?) materials at a later time. So, it seems there’s some question as to whether Curiosity will actually be examining clays that date from a more clement and habitable period of Mars’ history. It may be that the clays at Gale formed around the same time as the sediments at Meridiani—a period when surface water was generally acidic and much less common.

I’m sure this observation is nothing new to those “in the loop,” but it was a revelation to me. Hopefully, Curiosity will be able to determine the true origin of these clays. I guess I’m preparing myself just in case the press reports “disappointing” results from Curiosity sometime next year.

Tom
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th April 2024 - 06:04 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.