IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

19 Pages V  « < 8 9 10 11 12 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
ROVER WHEELS: Monitoring changes over time, NOTE: Read back through the thread to avoid repeating misconceptions
dr_rick
post Jan 7 2014, 11:28 AM
Post #136


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 20-December 13
Member No.: 7070



thank you for this discussion and for the images posted, and in particular that posted by Astro0 9 posts back.

When I was looking at this, I was concerned that, at the end of what appears to be a crack or break in the wheel surface material (unless I have completely misunderstood the image - in which case, please forgive me - this is my first post here), there looked to be a distortion of the wheel surface continuing in the direction of the break, suggesting that a crack continues in that direction. I downloaded the image and fiddled with the contrast (attached) and believe that my initial observation is correct. In terms of monitoring the progress of the damage to the wheel, it will be interesting to see whether the cracking continues in that direction.

modified to make image clearer
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jan 8 2014, 04:11 PM
Post #137


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4252
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



These two MH wheel views happen to show almost identical faces of the LF wheel - load them up in different windows and flip between them to see the changes between sols 488 and 506 (three shortish drives between them):
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/ms...0001E1_DXXX.jpg
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/ms...0000E1_DXXX.jpg
Apart from some new small scratches, there seems to be a new hole near the bottom of the wheel.

(Mods - sorry, I meant to post this in the wheel thread.)
Mod: Done.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jan 8 2014, 04:18 PM
Post #138


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10196
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



To me it looks like the hole was there before, but with shaded ground behind it instead of illuminated ground.

Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jan 8 2014, 05:42 PM
Post #139


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Phil, I think fredk is referring to the red-arrow highlighted feature:
Attached Image

The opaque appareance and the straight borders suggests it is a simple light-spot projected from squared opening (windows) on top of the wheel (you can see another spot above it...).


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jan 8 2014, 06:16 PM
Post #140


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4252
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



You may be right, Dilo - at first I thought that couldn't be sunlight shining through a hole because the inner wheel surface is quite dark grey, as you can see from the other light spot. But if there are patches of soil sitting on the bottom of the wheel, they would look bright orange when sunlit of course. Once we get a rotated view of the wheel we'll know for sure.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jan 8 2014, 06:50 PM
Post #141


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Yeah, I stared at that for a while this morning and couldn't decide either whether it was a new hole or a sunlight patch. I was leaning toward sunlight patch but don't see strong enough evidence to overturn anybody's call either way.


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greenish
post Jan 15 2014, 04:00 PM
Post #142


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 219
Joined: 14-November 11
From: Washington, DC
Member No.: 6237



Looks like the ~1-meter drive on sol 513 was equal to a half-turn of the wheels, with MAHLI imaging of all wheels at 4 positions - I suppose the repeatability test for arm position the other day was with this in mind, though I don't know if we could tell other than from SPICE files if the arm was stowed for each step, or if they found a spot smooth enough to leave it deployed for these small steps. Wonder if they will do the other half-turn next sol, or if those positions are covered by other recent imaging? They downlinked and posted the images quickly, too - about 6 hours after taking them.

The good news is that there's not much discernable difference between sol 490 (right image) and sol 513 (left) on the worst spot on the front left wheel.

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greenish
post Jan 15 2014, 04:25 PM
Post #143


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 219
Joined: 14-November 11
From: Washington, DC
Member No.: 6237



Should have read the news first. From Ken Herkenhoff (full text here):

QUOTE
...Sol 513, which will be dominated by a full set of MAHLI images of wheels. The images will be taken between short drives, to turn the wheels a bit and allow the entire surfaces of the wheels to be imaged....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Olivier
post Jan 15 2014, 04:31 PM
Post #144


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 29-November 13
Member No.: 7047



Are all the wheels "in sync" ??? i.e. do they all show the same exact number of rotation on a given drive?

Olivier
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
charborob
post Jan 15 2014, 04:53 PM
Post #145


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1074
Joined: 21-September 07
From: Québec, Canada
Member No.: 3908



They would if you were driving in a perfectly straight line on a smooth surface. But on a rugged surface, and with turns, you obviously have different numbers of rotations. For example, during a turn, the outer wheels make more rotations than the inner wheels.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jan 15 2014, 05:37 PM
Post #146


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4252
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Plus there will always be some wheel slippage, which will be different for each wheel.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jan 15 2014, 05:47 PM
Post #147


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



I believe that each wheel is independently controlled as well if they emulated the MER design philosophy. Therefore any rotational synchronization in term of identical RPMs (often over several Ms, frankly) would indeed have to be straight-line and frankly coincidental given external factors like slippage.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jan 15 2014, 06:05 PM
Post #148


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



With all this recent wheel imaging, it really seems like it should be possible to produce a systematic survey of the current condition of the entire circumference of all the wheels. Just throwing that out there in case someone has the time to organize images into such a survey....


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Jan 16 2014, 12:35 AM
Post #149


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



I've ideas for a 0th and 1st approximation of an "undistortion" algorithm for the wheel images. For the 0th approximation three points should be sufficent to retrieve the mantle of an assumed cylindric wheel. A fourth point as parameter may already be sufficient to take account of the perpendicular curvature.

This shouldn't be too difficult to program. May be I'll dare a try on Sunday.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Jan 16 2014, 07:28 AM
Post #150


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



Yes please Gerald.....'Dare Mighty Things'! smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

19 Pages V  « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th June 2024 - 04:13 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.