IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Paper: Spectral Evidence for Liquid Water on Mars, LPSC 2011, Renno and Mehta
marsbug
post Apr 6 2011, 08:14 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 401
Joined: 5-January 07
From: Manchester England
Member No.: 1563



HiRISE strikes again on the looking for water front: LPSC 2011, spectral evidence for liquid water on Mars.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
schaffman
post Apr 21 2011, 03:07 PM
Post #2


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 55
Joined: 6-March 10
From: Cincinnati, OH
Member No.: 5246



QUOTE (marsbug @ Apr 6 2011, 04:14 PM) *
HiRISE strikes again on the looking for water front: LPSC 2011, spectral evidence for liquid water on Mars.


Interesting. I wonder whether the brines could be a source for the gypum detected in the polar dunes.

Tom
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Drkskywxlt
post Apr 21 2011, 03:16 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 29-August 06
From: Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1083



QUOTE (marsbug @ Apr 6 2011, 03:14 PM) *
HiRISE strikes again on the looking for water front: LPSC 2011, spectral evidence for liquid water on Mars.


Alfred McEwan stood up during that talk to specifically say that he, speaking for the HIRISE team, does NOT agree with their conclusions.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsbug
post Apr 21 2011, 07:12 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 401
Joined: 5-January 07
From: Manchester England
Member No.: 1563



Thats good, a claim like that needs to be challenged (without passing judgment on it myself - challenging it is just scientific process at work). Do you recall any of the specifics of McEwans critisicm?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Drkskywxlt
post Apr 22 2011, 12:06 AM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 29-August 06
From: Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1083



QUOTE (marsbug @ Apr 21 2011, 02:12 PM) *
Do you recall any of the specifics of McEwans critisicm?


Unfortunately, no. He wasn't denying that they were seeing SOMETHING, but just said it wasn't liquid water. Don't recall what he thought it was.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
schaffman
post Apr 22 2011, 01:17 PM
Post #6


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 55
Joined: 6-March 10
From: Cincinnati, OH
Member No.: 5246



QUOTE (Drkskywxlt @ Apr 21 2011, 11:16 AM) *
Alfred McEwan stood up during that talk to specifically say that he, speaking for the HIRISE team, does NOT agree with their conclusions.


One thing the abstract doesn't overtly mention is that the area showing the purported location of the spectral signals for brines (Fig. 2) is located in the crater Richardson, near the south pole. The abstract just says "polar region." The discussion of the Phoenix results at the beginning leads one to conclude the authors are talking about the north polar region. The elevations around Richardson crater are about 1 km above datum in contrast to the several km below datum for the north polar region. It seems to me that the lower atmospheric pressures in the south polar regions make these locations a less likely place for liquid brines than in the north. No?

Tom
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Drkskywxlt
post Apr 22 2011, 01:53 PM
Post #7


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 29-August 06
From: Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1083



QUOTE (schaffman @ Apr 22 2011, 08:17 AM) *
It seems to me that the lower atmospheric pressures in the south polar regions make these locations a less likely place for liquid brines than in the north. No?

Tom


Perhaps...does the salt in the water also allow it to stay liquid at low pressures as it lowers the freezing point? For pure water that's certainly true.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
schaffman
post Apr 22 2011, 03:47 PM
Post #8


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 55
Joined: 6-March 10
From: Cincinnati, OH
Member No.: 5246



QUOTE (Drkskywxlt @ Apr 22 2011, 09:53 AM) *
Perhaps...does the salt in the water also allow it to stay liquid at low pressures as it lowers the freezing point? For pure water that's certainly true.


I think adding salts decreases the vapor pressure of pure water, which increases its boiling temperature. The water boils when its vapor pressure exceeds atmospheric pressure. So, briny liquids should also be more stable at higher elevations on Mars than pure water, all else being equal. Still, I’d expect the stability field of the same liquid to be wider at lower elevations, making its presence more likely in the low elevation north than the south. Aslo the presence of abundant water ice is better documented for the north polar region.

As an additional note, the authors’ Fig. 2 is from images taken in the southern spring (Ls 210°–220°) when the seasonal CO2 cap is rapidly sublimating. I think CO2 can interfere with the spectral signature of water. (It’s interesting that CO2 ice is not included in their Fig. 1 for comparison.)

All in all, based on this layman’s opinion, McEwen is right to be skeptical.

Tom
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Apr 23 2011, 02:02 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



I think the question about the salts' effect on boiling/melting points has been asked here before. If I remember right, the answer was that these are sulfate salts, and the effect is much smaller than for the sort of salts we're used to thinking about.

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fran Ontanaya
post Apr 23 2011, 12:18 PM
Post #10


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 22-September 08
From: Spain
Member No.: 4350



It doesn't necessarily have to be exposed to the atmosphere. A thin crust of ice could hold enough pressure to reach the triple point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th March 2024 - 03:52 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.